10825833
Beschreibung
Mindmap von Jennifer Wilhite, aktualisiert more than 1 year ago
|
Erstellt von Jennifer Wilhite
vor etwa 7 Jahre
|
|
uncertain ontologies
- Gilles Deleuze
- the political is important
- ontology of difference
- time is ????
nebulous to say
the least
- Identity is always in flux
- becoming is all there is
- a system of representation cannot make anything new*
- a system of representation cannot make anything new*
- becoming is all there is
- Identity is always in flux
- nontraditional means of articulation
- everything is equal
- everything is equal
- What is real? NOTHING! It's always changing!
- BIG on difference
- ontology: things come into being via differences- frictions- power relations?
- ontology: things come into being via differences- frictions- power relations?
- the political is important
- Foucault
- thinking the impossible (or not
thought of yet) because the world
needs new ways to live so we don't kill
everyone
- humans are not the center of the universe
- humans are not the center of the universe
- Is criticized for non-politic moves
- freedom does not consist of the
implementation of new relations of
power, but in the moment of
possibility which precedes such
reforms;
- freedom does not consist of the
implementation of new relations of
power, but in the moment of
possibility which precedes such
reforms;
- ontology of present
- tensions make impossible possible (?)
- how do we think differently?
- Engaging critically with the present in
turn facilitates identification and
countering of norms, institutions, and
practices that generate normalizing
effects.
- critic creates resistance/freedom
- Obviously, fear of
uncertainty and
attachment to what
believe we already know
greatly hinders persons’
ability to critically analyze
existing meaning‐making
systems and, therefore, to
identify, analyze, and
counter harmful practice
- power relations: that's where we find new ways to live
- power relations: that's where we find new ways to live
- Obviously, fear of
uncertainty and
attachment to what
believe we already know
greatly hinders persons’
ability to critically analyze
existing meaning‐making
systems and, therefore, to
identify, analyze, and
counter harmful practice
- critic creates resistance/freedom
- Engaging critically with the present in
turn facilitates identification and
countering of norms, institutions, and
practices that generate normalizing
effects.
- both see conformity as 'bad'
- limits creativity- they are not wrong
- limits creativity- they are not wrong
- nothing is unmoveable
- thought is freedom
- point between present and possible
- The capacity for thought hinges on experiencing points of uncertainty
- The capacity for thought hinges on experiencing points of uncertainty
- point between present and possible
- thought is freedom
- thinking the impossible (or not
thought of yet) because the world
needs new ways to live so we don't kill
everyone
- Spaces of invention Dissension, Freedom, and Thought in Foucault
- our utterances are governed by underlying rules of discourse formations
- our very conception of self is circumscribed by technologies of subjectivity
- our actions are proscribed and authorized by relations of power
- Where in Foucault is space for invention?
- Within Foucault's studies of knowledge, power, and subjectivity and
that this space can be demonstrated by considering the
counterpoints to his tripartite understanding of the human
condition
- The limiting/enabling relations of knowledge/ power/subjectivity are counterpointed by three terms
that describe the conditions for invention: dissension, freedom, and thought
- normalized societies just produce more of the same
- social herd
- Nietzsche’s work reveals that what persons in fact
know and engage is not the world in which we live,
but rather the meaningmaking systems that we
have imposed upon the world.
- Nietzsche’s work reveals that what persons in fact
know and engage is not the world in which we live,
but rather the meaningmaking systems that we
have imposed upon the world.
- social herd
- The limiting/enabling relations of knowledge/ power/subjectivity are counterpointed by three terms
that describe the conditions for invention: dissension, freedom, and thought
- Within Foucault's studies of knowledge, power, and subjectivity and
that this space can be demonstrated by considering the
counterpoints to his tripartite understanding of the human
condition
- Through committed engagement,
the critic is involved in both
resisting existing relations of
power and creating new sets of
social relations and
understandings
- Where in Foucault is space for invention?
- discourse formations: evolution of or emergence of statements contingent on context
- used to solidify image of stability
- gaps = resistance actions
- inventional places
- contradictions
- space of freedom!
- contradictions
- inventional places
- gaps = resistance actions
- used to solidify image of stability
- our very conception of self is circumscribed by technologies of subjectivity
- knowledge power subjectivity
- POWER: fine web of relations interwoven with
the conditions of social action and, in part,
from his suggestion that even overtly resistant
acts are ultimately reabsorbed into these
relations of power
- resistance comes in the gaps of intelligibility in the power relationship
- Where rules are vague- there will be
push and pull(?)
- the pointing out of the gaps obscures
the gaps (the article is not hypocritical -
see the consession at the end)
- spaces of freedom
- spaces in power relations
- spaces in thought
- spaces of dissension
- emergent contradictions
- points of productivity
- new discourses
- creation of NEW
- new discourses
- points of productivity
- emergent contradictions
- spaces of dissension
- spaces in thought
- spaces in power relations
- spaces of freedom
- the pointing out of the gaps obscures
the gaps (the article is not hypocritical -
see the consession at the end)
- Where rules are vague- there will be
push and pull(?)
- limiting and enabling
- resistance: friction against which the relationships
of power operate to achieve governance
- resistance: friction against which the relationships
of power operate to achieve governance
- freedom and domination: flux
between freedom and
domination
- WAIT: Foucaults notion of freedom, on the other hand, cannot be the
reversal of power relations, for such a reversal entails replacing
existing power relations with new power relations. Indeed, if Foucault
conceives of freedom as the reversal of power relations, then his
condemnation of the prophets and legislators (1991, 159) who offer
reforms and new directions would equal a condemnation of freedom
as such reversals would be the very stuff of freedom.:
- WAIT: Foucaults notion of freedom, on the other hand, cannot be the
reversal of power relations, for such a reversal entails replacing
existing power relations with new power relations. Indeed, if Foucault
conceives of freedom as the reversal of power relations, then his
condemnation of the prophets and legislators (1991, 159) who offer
reforms and new directions would equal a condemnation of freedom
as such reversals would be the very stuff of freedom.:
- resistance comes in the gaps of intelligibility in the power relationship
- our utterances are governed by underlying rules of discourse formations
Möchten Sie kostenlos Ihre eigenen Mindmaps mit GoConqr erstellen? Mehr erfahren.