Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Environmental Management and Industry
- Pollution prevention
- Waste & Emission Prevention (WEP)
- " the avoidance or minimization of the creation of waste exports and emissions by reduction at source, by on site recycling and / or by reducing the total level of its harmfulness to the environment "
- P2
- "the minimization of waste exports and emissions to air, water and soil in a preventive way, that is, by tackling the causes of the impacts, not by displacing or mitigating the effects".
- Carrying out a P2-project
- 1. Planning and organization
- 2. Assessment
- 3. Feasibility analysis
- 4. Implementation
- Decision making
- Planning and execution
- Follow-up: what's next?
- Technical, Economical, Evironmental feasability
- Final report
- Collecting Data
- Selecting flows
- Generating prevention options
- Getting involvement
- Establish goals
- Hierarchy
- Cooperation between companies to optimize off-site recycling
- Eco-industrial parks
- Estate of manufcaturing and service business located together. Member businesses seek enhanced economic, environmental and social performance. Working together leads to a collective benefit: 1 + 1 = 3
- Environmental Management Systems
- “That part of the overall management system which includes organisational structure, planning activities, responsibilities, practices, procedures, processes, and resources for developing, implementing, achieving, reviewing and maintaining the environmental policy”
- Direct activities in a:
- Consistent way: efficiency
- Complete way
- continuous way: policy aiming a way of continuous improvement
- Motives
- Internal:Identify, control and reduce. Compliance, cost-saving, avoid environmental harm
- External: demonstrate awareness, increase competitiveness
- For governments: stimulate companies to be responsible. Reduce permitting,
- ISO 14001
- Contains: standard requirements that may be objectively audited for purposes of certification
- Environmental Policy:
- provides initial foundation and direction for the EMS. The policy needs to clarify compliance with environental legislation
- Planning
- Process to identify significant environmental aspects
- Legislative and other requirements
- Environmental objectives and targets
- Environmental program
- time schedules, budgets, personnel, and control procedures
- Implementation & Operation
- Organzation and personnel: commitment is needed and
- Training, awareness and competence
- Training, awareness and competence
- Communication
- EMS manual: maintain information about their EMS
- Documentation
- Operational control
- Preparation and reaction to calamities
- Checking and corrective action
- Monitor and Measure (does the company comply with work, targets, etc)
- Corrective action in case of non-compliance
- EMS audits (=controle)
- Management review
- Top management should review the EMS, to ensure continual stability, adequacy and effectiveness
- Elements
- EU's own standard: EMAS
- EcoManagement and Audit Scheme
- More explicit on regulatory compliance: EMAS requires compliance where ISO14001 requires "commitment to compliance"
- Shorter range of environmental effects have to be addressed while ISO states all significant effects have to be addressed
- Biggest difference: EMAS requires to publish a public report with motive and efforts etc)
- Deming Cycle
- Do
- Plan
- establish goals and measures to achieve them
- Check
- Act
- ISO 14006
- general guidance and practical help for all organizations that are interested in implementing environmental management systems
- The three levels of direction
- Strategic
- Tactical
- Operational
- Generic scheme for EMS development
- 1. Planning and Organization
- 2. Initial Review
- Systematic anaylsis of environmental issues. of impacts and their main causes
- 3. Formulating an environmental policy statement and developing an action plan
- Action plan describes action and targets for putting the policy statement in effect
- Priority, objective, action, target, timeframe, tasks
- 4. Execution of the plan
- Can be: environmental analyses, developing EMS elements, WEP,P2-projects
- 5. Evaluation and reporting
- Key questions
- Develop EMS Bottom-up or Top-down
- Top-Down: top management determines EMS and directs implementation. Communication with employees will be one-way. The advantage is that development is initiated fast. Disadvantage is that usefull workfloor information is neglected and commitment/motivation from workers will drop
- Bottom-up: implies a high participation of workers and are early stage included and informed. Advantage is increased motivation and big contributions. The disadvantage is that the EMS will proceed at a slow pace
- Develop a specific EMS-system or integrate it with other management systems
- Companies ofte nalready use Deming cycle, so the EMS can be easily integrated. But it will be difficult to integrate overlapping items
- Indicators
- Environmental Condition Indicators
- Provide information about the condition of the environment: State in DPSIR
- Environmental performance indicators
- Management performance indicaters
- Response in DPSIR
- Operational performance indicators
- • the design, operation, and maintenance of the organization’s physical facilities and equipment; • the materials, energy, products, services, wastes, and emissions related to the organization’s physical facilities and equipment; and • the supply of materials, energy and services to, and the delivery of products, services and wastes from the organization’s physical facilities and equipment. Pressure in DPSIR
- How are WE doing?
- EPI-development
- 1. Establish the objectives of the indicators: what are the aims that we want to develop indicators for?
- 2. Define the metrics of the inidcators
- 3. Formulate the assessment of the indicators: by which procedures can we establish the values of the indicators?
- Organizations and organizational change
- Main goals: continuity and growth
- Five company strategies by Mintzberg: the 5 P's
- Plan: intended course of action
- Ploy: a really specific manoeuvre to ouwit competitor
- Pattern: strategy shouldn't be plan. What was successful in the past can be succesful in the future
- Position: how the organiation relates to its competitive environment and what it can do to make its product unique in the marketplace
- Perspective: influence of organizational culture and collective thinking on the strategic decision making within the company
- The Four-stage model
- Usefulness
- May help as a guideline for mapping the state of environmental management in a company
- Whether the company characteristics levels are in balance. In this way the model can be helpful in choosing the right environmental strategy
- It helps the upgrade of a company to a higher strategy by identifying bottle necks (=knelpunten)
- Mintzberg's models
- Technostructure (analysts) which co-ordinate tasks in the organization by standardization of work or output
- Support staff (support outside the realm of core activities
- Middle line (middle managers)
- Operating Core (the work floor)
- Strategic Apex (top management)
- Co-ordination mechanisms
- Organization types
- Entrepeneurial
- Direct supervision from CEO
- Key part: strategic apex
- Usually small; small organization; personal
- Apex commitment is decisive: personal contact is important
- Machine
- coordination mechanism: standardization of work process
- Key: technostructure
- Large established organizations: standard products with standard routine administrative of technological production process
- Company structure suitable for ISO-14001 EMSs
- Professional
- Prime coordiation mechanism: standardization of skills
- Operating core is the key part
- Medium to large organizations; providing complex services in a stable environment
- Difficult for implementing EMS; commitment from operating core is important
- Organizational Learning
- Models of (individual) learning
- Kolb Cycle
- 1. Concrete experience
- 2. Reflective observation
- 3. Abstract observation
- 4. Active Experimentation
- Giving rise to a new idea
- Romme & Dillen: Single/Double loop learning
- Single loop: errors are corrected based on existing rules and norms
- Double loop: changes in rules and norms based on cognitive processes
- Learning processes in generating organizational learning
- Individual learning
- Process or system learning: information processing and problem solving capabilities are enhanced
- Culture
- Knowledge management: through individuals and in organization (documents, records, etc)
- Life Cycle Management
- 1. Analysising the total environmental impact of the product life cycle (LCA or ecobalance. 2. Organizing the product chain to co-operate in making environmental improvements
- Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
- 1. Goal and scope defenition
- Determining the goal: product design, finding env. bottle necks
- Determining the functional unit of assessment (miles of transport, one-year use of diapers)
- 2. Inventory analysis
- Making a process flow chart
- Collecting environmental data
- Fixating system boundaries
- Processing data into the inventory table
- 3. Impact assessment
- Classification of environmental impacts into categories of environmental problems
- Characterization: calculating for each category the total of impacts
- Normalization: calculating the magnitude of the category indicators relative to a common reference
- Weighting and aggregation: calculating the total scores by simple summation of the category scores
- 4. Interpretation
- Interpretation is important to all stages. It is dependent on the goal of the study. The major goals are product comparison and bottleneck identification
- Critiques
- Uncertainties due to: setting boundaries, attribution of impact, classification factors, variability in time/chains
- Normative choice concerning of categories and methods of normnalisation and weighting
- High costs
- Easily Biasable
- Legitamacy
- Organizing a LCM
- 1. Identifying main fields of application
- What will be the focus?
- Waste prevention
- Product design
- Eco-design (DfE): directed to reducing the environmental impacts of the whole product life cycle requiring co-operation of different actors
- Can lead to government stimulated eco-labeling
- 2. Identifying actors that are able to direct the chain
- When predominant actors are present: interested and powerful (economy-wise) ones will be chain director
- When predominant actors are lacking: product associations take the role of chain director
- Independent societies directed by a board/governmental organ/environmental organization. Eco-label organizations are rather weak.
- Extending existing structures of chain management to environemtal issues
- Co-makership: company and supplier co-operatively design the products to be supplied - with env. aspects taken into account
- Product stewardship: company takes responsibility for the use of the product after sale. Pesticide manufacturers can provide proper product information and support resposible application
- Just-in-time production: minimize storage costs and stock depriciation
- Product quality certification: include next to for example food safety certifications for further environmental requirements
- Eco-design
- Directed to designing more environmentally friendly products
- Reduce or minimize the use of non-renwables
- Reduce toxic and harmful emissions to the
environment
- Manage renewable resources
- Tools
- LCA:
- Material Flow Analysis and Substance flow Analysis
- Green indices & eco-point systems:
- Ranking systems attempting to summarize various env. impacts into a simple scale
- Material selection
- Label advisors such as IBM and Chrysler
- Eco-label requirements and guidelines that are provided
- Design for disassembly and recycling aids
- State of LCM in companies and governmental policy
- No LCM
- Only internal
- Limited waste prevention activities
- Defense of products (LCA used to defend products
- Environmental product development (using the LCA)
- Environmental integrated chain management (LCA, product design, etc.)
- Policy steps towards LCM
- Stimulation development of methods and projects
- Changing conditions by regulations and economic measures
- Enhancing the role of the consumer (product information)
- Product-oriented environmental management codes
- From environmental management to industrial ecosystems
- From a single company to a complete industry
- Industrial ecology
- The envisage of industrial production as an ecosystem of organisms,
- Exchange in energy, information and resources
- Similar concept: industrial metabolism: more fixated on material and substance flows.
- Eco-industrial symbiosis (or Eco-industrial parks)
- Traditionally separate industries engage in a collective approach to competitive advantage involving pysical exchange of materials, water, energy and byproducts
- Waste exhange
- Within a company between organizational parts
- Among co-located companies in an industrial zone
- Among nearby companies within e.g. 3 km distance
- Dematerialization: de-linking economic growth combined with increased environmental impact
- Circular Economy
- Design out waste: material cycles closed with composting/re-upcycling so waste is mininal
- Build resilience through diversity: more connections over multiple scales are more resilient to external shocks
- Rely on energy from renewable sources
- Think in systems: helps to understand how parts influence on another and to consider the relationship with infrastructure, env. and society
- Waste is food: biological reuse of composed materials and up-cycyling to sustain items in the closed loop
- Ecological modernization theory
- Core features
- Science and technology as central institutions of environmental reform (from end-of-pipe
- Stress on role of market dynamics and economic agents (rejecting the opposition of economy and ecology)
- Shifting from role of the state (from CnC to participatory)
- 1. Establishing together with science, the effective environmental policy and an framework to implement this.
- Giving room to industry, to elaborate and fill in this long-term policy in its own way.
- Modernizing the organization of production and consumption by removing the 'design fault', while taking ecological considerations into account.
- Role of the public
- Increase of awareness
- Pressure from groups/the neighborhood about environmental impact on health
- by pressure from env. organizations
- By pressure from financiers and customers, taking sustainability into account when investing
- By internal pressure from employees
- Triad-network model: considering the social-economic structure of a company
- Policy
- Q's: which authorities are responsible for setting env. standards, issuing regulations, granting permits and CnC? How can relations be improved to stimulated environmental management
- Industrial
- Q's: what are the env. interests of the main customers of a product(ion process), who are the suppliers, where is the co-operation?
- Societal
- Q's: who are pressure groups, what are their env. demands, are agreements with e.g. NGOs possible?