Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Why Did Detente Collapse?
- The Arab-Israeli conflict:
The October War, 1973
- On 6th October President Sadat's Egyptian
forces invaded the Israeli occupied Sinai, By
the 22nd October, The USA and USSR
managed to persuade Egypt and Israel to a
cease-fire
- Shows a cooperative stance
taken by both USA and USSR
- USA backed Israel, the USSR backed Egypt
- Within Hours of the cease-fire being announced
the Israeli's attacked the Egyptians
- The Soviet Union wanted to sent both US and
Soviet troops into the are to enforce the
cease-fire, the US rejected this notion
- American;s wanted to look like
the sole power behind enforcing
the cease-fire, also they wanted
to reduce the Soviets influence
in the middle east
- Kissinger convened a National Security council meeting and
DEFCON-3 military alert was declared, this included the Strategic
Air Command (SAC) and the North America Air Defence
command (NORAD)
- The crises was over when a UN
international peacekeeping force was
sent in Excluding US and Soviet troops
- Implications on Detente
- Both sides breached the Basic Principles by seeking to gain a
unilateral advantage in the area
- The USA resumed its own
diplomatic efforts among Key Arab
states and the Israelis. This
became known as 'shuttle
diplomacy'
- The October War had created new strategies towards
the ME by both the USA and the USSR and this put
pressure on the validity of detente
- Angola, 1974-1976, The
Angolan Civil War,
1975-1976
- In April 1974 a revolution in
Portugal led to the creation of
a left wing military junta
taking power
- The New government announced its decision to
grant independence to its Southern African colony,
Angola, the following year an end to all military
action against the Angolan Nationalists was ended
in May 1974
- There was instantly a power struggle between
three Angolan independence groups
- MPLA- the Popular Movement for the Liberation of
Angola
- Backed by Cuba and The Soviet Union
- FNLA- the National Front for the
Liberation of Angola
- Backed By the USA, China and South Africa
- UNITA- the National Union for the Liberation of Angola
- The Alvor Accords of January 1975, was a high
point in attempts to manage the transition to indepence
- This committed all three independence groups to a transitional government
- Very quickly External
powers began to intervene
- In June 1974, China sent 120 military advisers to Zaire to aid the FNLA.
- In July 1974, America increased its covert funding to the FNLA
- The MPLA recieved funding and arms supplies from the
Soviet Union from October 1974
- By late January 1976 there was about 12,000
Cuban troops supporting the MPLA
- This significantly aided the MPLA to reach a final
victory by March 1976
- The MPLA
proclaimed
the creation of
the People
Republic of
Angola (PRA)
as early as
November
- The USA's Position
- By Nov 1975- The USA did not regard Angola as
a direct threat to its economic and strategic
interests.
- In Dec. 1975 William Colby, Director of CIA , when asked why the USA backed the
FNLA, he replied, ' Becasue the Soviets are backing the MPLA is the simplest answer'
- They saw Soviet intervention in Angola as a direct violation of detente
and the principles agreed via the latter.
- The Soviet Union's position
- The Soviet's did not
intervene until the USA
had begun covertly
funding the FNLA in July
1974
- The Soviet's priority in 1974
was to ensure that China did
not gain at their expense in
Angola
- They wanted to be the world leading communist state and
supporting the establishment of communism in the developing
world ensure that this was possible. They wanted to look
better than China in that respect.
- They saw the backing of the FNLA by China
and America as part of a cooperative and
Sino-American response to springboard the
latter's influence in the developing world
- The events in Angola
'74-'76 show how
different the
perceptions of detente
were by the US and
USSR, and how
detente was always
destined to fail as
ideological differences
were the main reason
for the collapse of
detente
- Afghanistan, 1979
- In April 1978 a coup had led to the
overthrow of Muhammad Daoud, who
was in charge since 1973 with the
support of the leftist People's
Democratic Party of Afghanistan
(PDPA).
- It was the same Party who overthrown Daoud
- This led to the Soviet Invasion
of Afghanistan, in December
1979
- The Soviet Union and Afghanistan, 1978-1979
- The PDPA regime was an ally of USSR
- This fragmented and a
faction of the fragmented
PDPA, led by Hafizullah
Amin, gained control
- They began a campaign
against the influence of
Islam by rejecting the
wearing of the Islamic veil
and the use of Islamic
green in the national flag
- The USSR was concerned that the
regime was rapidly alienating many of
the Afghans and this could lead to real
instability, and might align itself with
USA or PRC creating a threat right
under the Soviets border
- Soviet interests in Afghanistan
- There was a shared border stretching 2,500 kilometres adjoining
the Muslim Central Asian republics of the USSR
- Afghanistan was a socialist state and a regional ally of the USSR. If it aligned with
the USA this would strengthen the USA's geo-strategic power in the region, at the
expense of the USSR
- The only way to ensure that the Soviets security was not threatened,
was to undertake military action
- The Military intervention was a
defensive Afghanistan plunging
into chaos and becoming the
subject of external interference.
- The USA's reaction to Afghanistan
- In the year following Daoud's removal the
USA hardly considered the possibility of
Soviet military intervention in Afghanistan in
order to change the new regime.
- Only when the Shah's pro-American regime in Iran by Islamic
fundamentalists. The American's feared that Ayatollah's
regime may collapse and leave Iran vulnerable to leftists and
communists iinfluences
- This could lead to improved
Soviet influence in the area
- ON Dec 27 1979, the Soviets
killed Amin, and increased the
amount of troops which had
begun on 24 december
- the Americans referred to the intervention in Afghanistan as a blatant
violation of accepted international rules of behaviour and a grave
threat to peace
- On 3rd january 1980 Carter formally asked
US congress to postpone the signing of
the SALT II treaty, because of the invasion.
- On the 4th of January Carter introduced
a series of measures aimed at the
Soviet union these included:
- major restriction on Soviet fishing
priveleges in american waters
- an embargo on sail of grain to the Soviet Union
- US military and economic assistance to Pakistan to
enhance that state's security
- The USA failed to recognise all the possible
motives for the Invasion and assumed it was part
of a process of regional expansionism, much like
in eastern Europe
- The Carter Doctrine, January 8 1980
- The Carter Doctrine was ultimately a commitment to prevent any
further Soviet Advance in the Persian Gulf area and the south west
Asia
- Carter tried to suspend east west detente over Europe however the west
rejected this as detente was working beneficially for NATO and the west
- As a result of this invasion
detente was dead
- What did this mean for detente?
- This was the final blow in detente's existence. As far as the
west was concerned, the invasion demanded international
condemnation and a policy of containment to prevent further
Soviet expansionism