Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Animal
Experimentation
- What is it?
- Use of
non-human
animals in
experiments
- Majority of experiments to
develop new medicines and test
the safety of other products
- Many experiments only
involve minor procedures (e.g
a change of diet). Those
requiring more invasive
procedures are given pain
relief if appropriate.
- Animals are
humanely destroyed
after experimentation
- What are the
ethical issues?
- Slippery Slope
- lead to the creation of hybrid
embryos? and then the creation of
human-hybrid embryos?
- cloning
- Stewardship
- 'Stewards to the earth, to
rule over the fish of the
sea and the birds of the
sky'
- created to look after the
earth, not to cause pain and
suffering
- What rights do
the animals
have?
- Equal rights to humans - e.g. Peter Singer
- No rights - e.g. Kant,
Carl Cohen
- Some rights, but not equal to humans - Tom Regan
- Alternatives
- Cell cultures
- Brain recording
techniques e.g. MRI,
PET, CT
- Microdosing - giving humans
small doses of the drug to
collect information about how it
is metabolised, and how safe it
is - has not been fully validated
as an alternative yet
- Animal testing is the best method
- Large sample
- Interaction between drug and entire body can be seen
- Examples
- Banting and Best: discovery
of insulin in dogs in the
1920s led to treatment for
both diabetic humans and
dogs.
- 2012- less than 0.5% of experiments
were on cats, dogs and primates
(senient organisms). 99% of
experiments were on birds, reptiles,
fish and rodents (insenient organisms).
- 90% of
veterinary
medicines
are the same
or very
similar to
human
medicines
- Scholars and Quotes
- Immanuel Kant
- 'Animals are not
self-conscious and are
there merely as means to
an end'
- Animals cannot reason,
and therefore the
categorical imperative does
not apply to them
- Indirect duties
towards animals
- 'Must practice kindness
towards animals, for he
who is cruel to animals
become hard also in his
dealings with men'
- Can use consequentialist
reasoning, as we have no
direct duties towards
animals
- Carl Cohen
- Animals have no moral
significance or rights
(ability to make moral
claims), as they do not
have intellectual
attributes
- Criticism - human beings, e.g.
babies and brain damaged people,
cannot make moral claims and thus
must also lack rights
- Peter Singer
- All creatures
should be
given moral
significance
- 'Speciesism' - belief that the
interests of one's own
species are more important
that interests of another
- The same experiments, with the same
amount of suffering, should be
performed on human, or no experiments
should be performed at all
- Proponent of preference
Utilitarianism, therefore
interesting in the pain and
pleasure an action will bring
- 'a being is not
capable of suffering,
or of enjoyment, there
is nothing to be taken
into account'
- Religious Views
- 'A humans being may
be worth many sparrows,
but even a sparrow does
not die unnoticed'
- Roman Catholic
- Catechism - 'animal
experiments are morally
acceptable'
- Other Denominations
- Rev. Anne
Wilkinson-Hayes (baptist) -
'most baptists would be
sympathetic towards the
use of animals in medical
research, but less
enthusiastic towards their
use in cosmetic products'