Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Control theory, rational choice and
routine activity
- Why don't people commit crime?
- All of us are potential deviants
- What stops us?
- 1. Legal controls
- 2. Social controls
- 3. Opportunities to commit crime
- Control theoryHirschi 1969: ‘The Causes of
Delinquency’
- Reaction to previous theories
- Strain Theory: Merton
- Empirical study (self report study)
- Crime spread across social groups
- Overprediction of working class
- White collar crime not incorporated
- -Middle class is committing crime just as much as lower class
- ‘‘Only control theory fits the facts’
- Key idea: Delinquent acts result when the individual’s bond to society is weak or broken’ (Hirschi
1969:16)
- Social bonds: “stake in conformity”
- Attachment
- What people think of you?
- If you don’t care then you do whatever you want
- Emotional
aspect
- Commitment
- Build up a business
Reputation Less likely
to commit crime All
the hard work you
put in something
Trapped in the prison
of your own making
- Rational aspect
- Involvement
- How much time and how much energy
you put into conventional things I’m a
bit tired, don’t wanna go stealing
- Rational aspect
- Beliefs
- Non-religious How much you believe that you should obey the
rules of society Very subjective Some laws more than others,
like cannabis
- Moral aspect
- -trapped in a prison of your own making -social
bond that everyone has -four elements that
everyone has -can be weaker or stronger in
different moments in your life
- Extending the model…Steven Box (1981): Deviance,
Reality and Society
- Why do some people commit crime, while others do not?
- ABILITY to offend depends on:
- Secrecy
- The chanceyou think you get away with it
- Skills
- Need to know who to do it, commit the offence
- Supply
- Special skills
- Social support
- Someone helps you like friends
- Symbolic support
- Moral justification, you don´t have any money for instance
- WISH to offend depends on
- Subterranean values (Matza and Sykes 1961):
- Excitement
Spontinatinaty
Excitement
- Gangs and the subculture
- Excitement
- confirmation of identity;
- material gain;
- creativity
- Everyone would, if you could
- Marxist criminologist
- Differential social controls
- Girls are not different in a biological way, but are raised in a different way. Greater attachment
bond. Different gender pattern
- Less prepared to take risks. Social expectations. Family, reputation. Reinforced by their peer
groups
- Backed up by research. In particular. Reduces a greater disparity. Less likely to commit crime
- Feminize social control: more control over boys. But also good sign that more girls commit crime than
before, they are freer
- Policy implications
- Education Parenting
Creating leisure
opportunities Family values
Boosting conventional
morality
- Oppressive and repressive?
- Limitations
- Underplays role of social structures and deeper social controls.
- Not all families are the same
- What is ignoring is broader social structures
- Women oversocialised? Where does that come from?
- Ignores nature of law and law enforcement
- It ignores how law actually works: labelling by the police
- Ignores different forms of crime
- In the riots e.g.: why do people start to loot
- Ignores different motivations
- It is important why people offend, but no emphasis on it
- Rational choice theories: key ideas
- Cost/ benefit calculation.
- How do offenders make choices?
- How can choices be influenced?
- Policy implications
- Manipulate environment
- Situational crime prevention (Clarke 1992):
- Increase effort
- Pin on card
- Increase risks
- CCTV
- Reduce reward
- Mark property to make it less vulnarable
- Link to classical criminology
- “Contemporary classicism”
- Bounded’ rationalitySOURCE: Farrell and
Pease (2006:187)
- Stil rational
- Routine activity theory(Cohen and Felson 1979)
- How is crime situated in everyday life? ‘Chemistry
for crime’: Motivated offenders Suitable targets
Absence of capable guardians Must converge in
time and space