Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Conservatism - Different Views and
Tensions
- Radicalism
- Radicalism is the belief or expression that there should be significant / extreme political and/or social
change.
- These changes should occur through
revolution
- Conservatism is directly opposed to radicalism in any
form.
- The father of modern conservatism (Edmund Burke) famously argued that the abstract notions of
equality, fraternity and equality were contrary to the traditions of French society.
- The result of radicalism would be chaos and social disorder.
- In the modern era, conservatives in the West are deeply opposed to the spread of Islamic
fundamentalism.
- This is most notable within the United States; a country in which the conservative movement is
coloured by a much greater level of religiosity than the United Kingdom.
- Conservatives have always claimed that radicalism is driven by ideologues and seeks to impose a
dogmatic vision of life upon society.
- Throughout history, there have been numerous illustrations of radical groups capturing the
apparatus of the state and imposing their ‘truth’ upon others.
- The result has often been characterised by destruction rather than conservation.
- Indeed, it is difficult to envisage anything as contrary to the conservative mindset as that of radicalism.
- Conservatives are, by nature and temperament; supporters of the status quo and opponents of
dramatic upheaval driven by ideologues.
- Radicalism is simply not part of conservative
language.
- Empiricism
- Empiricism is an epistemological approach which claims that knowledge comes primarily (or solely)
from experience.
- By definition, all conservatives thereby adopt an empiricist
stance.
- The conservative mindset is characterised by a combination of tradition and pragmatism
- Conservatives also reject the rationalist approach of liberalism and the scientific socialism advocated by
Marxists
- Neither rationalism nor scientific socialism is rooted in empiricism.
- Empiricism is clearly consistent with Burkean themes such as the accumulated wisdom of previous
generations.
- It is also encapsulated in traditional Tory opposition to the views of
experts
- Those who claim they have all the ‘right’ answers have often been shown to be wrong by the
consequences of events.
- Empiricism is also consistent with the Burkean perspective upon the social contract as opposed to
the rather arrogant view that the current generation knows what’s best.
- Traditional Conservatism
- Traditional conservatism is relatively insignificant within the field of British politics.
- As the term clearly implies, traditional conservatism is the oldest format of conservative thought.
- Traditional conservatism is associated strongly with the concept of hierarchy.
- With regards to conservatism, the main division is that between the one-nation perspective and the
New Right
- In order for society to function effectively, there must be some form of
hierarchy.
- Individuals within society need to be aware of their place within and accept their duties accordingly.
- For instance, those who hold the highest status have a responsibility to look after those further
down the social scale.
- Such ideas later developed into the concept of noblesse oblige, one of the fundamental ideas within
the mindset of conservatism.
- Neo-liberalism
- As the term implies, neo-liberalism represents a modernised form of the classical liberal tradition.
- The distinction between neo-liberalism and the New Right is relatively straight-forward.
- As the term implies, neo-liberalism represents a modernised form of the classical liberal tradition
- In contrast, the New Right school of thought belongs within the ideology of conservatism
- To some extent, a relationship exists between neo-liberalism and the New Right due to their shared
common ground.
- This is most notable in the field of economic policy, with both schools of thought highly supportive of
laissez-faire capitalism.
- Frankly, there is no discernible difference in terms of the economic policies advocated by neo-liberals
and the New Right
- Indeed, during the 2010-15 coalition government, right-wingers within the Tory Cabinet and Orange
Bookers in the Liberal Democrats co-operated over austerity measures and the need for a flexible
labour market.
- There is also strong opposition amongst neo-liberals and the New Right towards egalitarian measures
- Both strands of thought claim that socialism represents the sacrifice of the individual for collectivist
goals
- They claim that Britain is over-governed via state intervention within the economy and the nanny
state within the personal realm.
- The former Conservative Minister Keith Joseph succinctly encapsulated this view when he argued that
“inequality of income can only be eliminated at the cost of freedom.”
- there are major differences between neo-liberals and the New Right.
- Such divisions reflect the traditional points of departure between liberals and conservatives such as
law and order, multiculturalism, constitutional reform and morality.
- A liberal society is built upon mutual tolerance of diverse lifestyles, and all liberals (including
neo-liberals) adopt a position of moral relativism.
- Liberalism represents an atomistic society and will always oppose the stifling conformity of social
mores
- In stark contrast, conservatism adopts a stance of moral absolutism.
- Anti-permissiveness
- Permissiveness refers to a situation in which behaviour that some people might disapprove of is
allowed (often by a change in the law).
- Therefore, anti-permissiveness refers to a lack of change in the law or society to allow such
behaviour.
- Libertarian conservatives differ from neo-conservatives in their views on many lifestyle issues.
- Liberalism celebrates the diversity of human life and emphasises tolerance.
- This even extends to the realm of sexual behaviour.
- For liberals, the key phrase is that of consenting adults.
- However, conservatives claim that the increased number of one-parent families, divorce,
extra-marital affairs, contraceptive usage and a general decline in social mores undermine the social
fabric.
- Such behaviour is particularly harmful to children; which experience has shown tend to grow and thrive
within the security and stability offered by the conventional nuclear family
- In a modern context, the Tory Party’s argument that Britain was a broken society under New Labour
is consistent with this line of argument.
- When considering anti-permissiveness, it should also be noted that certain strands of conservatism
emphasise lifestyle issues more than others.
- For instance, libertarian conservatives take a more relaxed approach to such matters whereas
neo-conservatives adopt a more traditional approach.
- This is a feature of American politics and the culture wars that divide the two main
parties
- Abortion has been described as the last great divide between Republicans and Democrats.
- Conservatives in the US argue that the pro-choice side of the debate champion the rights of the
living over the as yet unclaimed demands of those yet to be born.
- On a related point, some of those rights for the living have been discovered from penumbras
identified by unelected members of an unaccountable and out-of-touch judiciary.
- This forms part of the broader conservative critique of the ‘liberal’
judiciary.
- Laissez-faire
- A laissez-faire system is an economic system in which the government tries to avoid interfering in the
economy; it is closely associated with capitalism.
- Conservatives argue that a system based upon private ownership (namely capitalism) is superior to the
statist alternative for a number of reasons.
- Firstly, it is argued that laissez-faire facilitates those who wish to ‘get on’ in life.
- The Conservative Party has consistently sought to present itself as offering help to hard-working individuals
and families.
- In order to back up this argument, one might consider polices such as providing mortgage tax relief to the sale
of council homes at a substantial discount.
- Secondly, conservatives are sympathetic towards laissez-faire capitalism because they feel it benefits
everyone
- This particular line of argument relates to an economic term called the trickle-down effect.
- The economic activity generated by those on high incomes is advantageous for all members of society due to
economic growth, greater levels of consumer choice and an increase in investment.
- Whilst the result of the trickle-down effect is an uneven distribution of wealth and income,
conservatives take the view that such an outcome is both inevitable and desirable.
- Thirdly, conservatives claim that the freer the market the freer the people.
- The ability to spend the wealth we earn is an important leitmotif / symbol of a free society.
- State intervention within the economy inevitably limits our economic freedom as it entails the
government confiscating our wealth.
- For instance, home ownership means that we are relatively free to do as we wish with our property
- Conservatives claim that this taps into a broader mindset reflected in the aphorism that ‘an
Englishman’s home is his castle.’
- Unlike those voices on the left, conservatives take a positive view of an economic system based upon
private ownership
- All conservatives believe that laissez-faire capitalism is a better system than common ownership of
the means of production
- The individual is much more likely to respect their own and others property as opposed to the
bureaucratic hand of the state.
- He/she has a very clear incentive to improve their home in terms of its sentimental and financial
value
- Yet whilst conservatives share a great deal of common ground with liberals on the issue of property,
there is a subtle degree of disagreement to be aware of.
- Conservatives reject the liberal argument that we have a right to property.
- Instead, there should be an emphasis upon the obligations that derive from private property (such as
respect for others).
- Laissez-faire in more
depth
- The issue of private property is a particularly significant dividing
line between left and right within the political spectrum.
- According to figures from the left, the acquisition of private property is the result of the pursuit of
self-interest and thereby represents social inequality
- In a particularly famous quote, the collectivist anarchist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon argued that “all
property is theft.”
- In contrast, all conservatives believe strongly in the benefits of private property.
- Ownership of private property provides us with a sense of security
- It offers physical and psychological protection from the pressures of the world outside and something
to fall back on during difficult financial times.
- Homeowners also have a clear stake within society, which thereby promotes conservative values such
as the maintenance of law and order
- Private property also enables us to reflect our sense of individuality and what values are important to
our family
- In addition, home ownership enables us to pass down our wealth to members of our own family, who
then act as custodians of that wealth.
- reflects the Burkean view of society.
- Human Imperfection
- The concept of human imperfection holds that “humans are flawed, which makes them incapable of
making good decisions for themselves.”
- First and foremost, conservatives adopt a pessimistic view of human nature.
- According to conservatives, we are all psychologically flawed and imperfect.
- The conservative view of human nature is largely grounded upon the Catholic notion of original sin
and Biblical warnings over human wickedness.
- Indeed, during the Enlightenment conservative theorists rejected the rationalist assumption that we
should be optimistic about humanity and seek to improve it.
- Conservatives also believe that we are driven by baser instincts rather than higher reasoning
- this is a fundamental difference with liberalism.
- For instance, conservatives believe that we seek protection for ourselves, our homes and our families.
- As such, we are by instinct suspicious of outsiders and prefer to live in a society based upon cultural
homogeneity.
- Human beings are also drawn towards competition over the acquisition of money, status and
property
- At times, this can lead to behaviour that needs to be regulated by the forces of law and order.
- Thirdly, those ideologies which adopt a fixed view of human nature are inherently wrong.
- Moreover, we cannot predict the future and should simply recognise the limits of our understanding.
- Those ideologies that promise a utopian system must be open to criticism in order to expose such
thinking as a doomed exercise in self-deception.
- Ultimately, all humans are intellectually flawed.