2125615
Beschreibung
Mindmap von Eliza_brainbox, aktualisiert more than 1 year ago
|
Erstellt von Eliza_brainbox
vor fast 10 Jahre
|
|
1.4
competing
claims on
resources
- TOP DOWN.... Initiated and managed by a large organisation, has affect on
individuals but without them being allowed an input.
- Three gorges dam Yangtze river.... Chinese
gov built dam. Provide green energy 10% of
China's energy, boosts international status,
provides employment. BUT it destroyed
ecosystems, 1.9 mill people displaced to higher
less fertile ground or urban areas where they
have no applicable skill.
- Cons
- Run by larger companies so poor
understanding of the needs of
individuals & no local knowledge.
Doesn't always benefit locals
- Run by larger companies so poor
understanding of the needs of
individuals & no local knowledge.
Doesn't always benefit locals
- Pros
- More funding therefore more likely to be
quicker with better experienced workers,
product is better quality.
- More funding therefore more likely to be
quicker with better experienced workers,
product is better quality.
- Three gorges dam Yangtze river.... Chinese
gov built dam. Provide green energy 10% of
China's energy, boosts international status,
provides employment. BUT it destroyed
ecosystems, 1.9 mill people displaced to higher
less fertile ground or urban areas where they
have no applicable skill.
- Individuals , groups or businesses and nations have different views
on development and the use and management of resources
according to their needs and interests.
- Land in Kericho, Kenya
- Natural forest
- Environmentalists-> maintains biodiversity. Crop growers-> maintains water cycle. International-> climate change
- Farmers/ tea growers-> uses fertile land. Developers-> takes up land from building
- Environmentalists-> maintains biodiversity. Crop growers-> maintains water cycle. International-> climate change
- Tea growing
- Individuals-> livelihood. international-> get tea. Business-> more money per hectare
then other crops
- Environmentalists-> natural forest destroyed, unbalance natural cycle e.g. water cycle
- Individuals-> livelihood. international-> get tea. Business-> more money per hectare
then other crops
- Housing
- Local people-> better housing. Developers/builders->business. Gov't->seem
like they're doing something. tea companies-> housing for workers.
- Farmers-> previously working land for da cash. uses resources. land
per person going dowwwnn
- Local people-> better housing. Developers/builders->business. Gov't->seem
like they're doing something. tea companies-> housing for workers.
- Food Crops
- Locals-> no starve no more & sell excess= better
livelihood. Gov't-> improve trade links & GDP.
Business-> more production=more money. Nation->
better food=better health
- Land could be used for high cash crop, therefore
more Wonga to purchase imported food. Bordering
countries-> competition for exported foods
- Locals-> no starve no more & sell excess= better
livelihood. Gov't-> improve trade links & GDP.
Business-> more production=more money. Nation->
better food=better health
- Flowers
- Companies-> increased income, lower wages. Consumers-> get flowers all year round
- Tea growing companies/farmers-> less space for them. Locals-> flowers=thirsty plant, lower water table.
Environmentalists-> transported in refrigeration
- Companies-> increased income, lower wages. Consumers-> get flowers all year round
- Fuel Wood
- Locals-> provides cheap fuel & excess to sell= local business boost
- Companies-> takes up space. Environmentalists->
no living space for animals
- Locals-> provides cheap fuel & excess to sell= local business boost
- Natural forest
- Land in Kericho, Kenya
- BOTTOM UP... run by local people and will be directly helping them or
their community.
- Muthukyandia, Sri Lanka, PASA. (Partially top down)
- PASA came to village, taught them how to build
water tanks. Locals provided labour and money.
Labourers learnt skills to allow the to carry on
building/repairing them.Started as top down the
developed into a bottom up project.
- PASA came to village, taught them how to build
water tanks. Locals provided labour and money.
Labourers learnt skills to allow the to carry on
building/repairing them.Started as top down the
developed into a bottom up project.
- see also case study of satichiwadi
- Pros
- 1) Better direct benefit to local community. 2) Tailored
to specific needs of local economy environment etc.
3) Uses local knowledge to better project, they know what
the problem is & how to address. 4) Helps unity in
community
- 1) Better direct benefit to local community. 2) Tailored
to specific needs of local economy environment etc.
3) Uses local knowledge to better project, they know what
the problem is & how to address. 4) Helps unity in
community
- Cons
- Less funding so finished product is less high
tech & economical. hard to scale up as it is
specific to area. No/minimal impact on
wider inter/national community
- Less funding so finished product is less high
tech & economical. hard to scale up as it is
specific to area. No/minimal impact on
wider inter/national community
- Muthukyandia, Sri Lanka, PASA. (Partially top down)
Möchten Sie kostenlos Ihre eigenen Mindmaps mit GoConqr erstellen? Mehr erfahren.