Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Stalin's Rise To Power!
- Stalin
- Political And Personal Ability
- He was General
Secretary, and was also
a member of the
Orgburo, Secretariat
and Politburo.
- Stalin was the only man to
occupy all of these positions
simultaneously and made
effective use of it.
- As General Secretary, Stalin ran the party
machine, doing so occupied the most
powerful single position in the USSR and
could decide promotions to party positions.
- As a member of the Politburo, Stalin was one of
the small of leading Communists who met
regularly to make policies, they were effectively
the decision makers of the USSR.
- Stalin was also head of the Workers' and
Peasants' Inspectorate, supervising the
work of all governement departments.
- After Lenin's death, he cleverly presented
himself as the upholder of the former leader's
legacy. He was instrumental in creating the
Lenin cult, which included having LEnins body
embalmed in Moscow's Red Square.
- Due to Lenin being regarded as the
fount of wisdom and the ultimate
authority on Marxism, Stalin began to
use Lenins's nameto justify his own
policies, making it very difficult for
colleagues to argue with him.
- With the use of all the methods, some of Lenin's
immense authority, his repuation had
undoubtably rubbed off on Stalin!
- Stalin arranged Lenin's funeral, delivered the
funeral speech, and stated his determination to
continue translating Lenin's ideas into practice.
- In the ideological battle over future Soviet
policy in the mid-1920's, Stalin was careful to
present himself as the man of the in the middle,
he avoided many of the part bickerings of those
rivals who aruged of the best path to Socialism.
- When Stalin did commit
himself to a policy, notable
'Socialism in One Country', it
was a policy that had general
appeal due to it being
focused on Russia focusing
on their own problems and
not trying to change the
world.
- Party Congresses were packed with his
supporters - party members who, in
most cases, owed their positions to
Stalin. Contrary to the impression given,
Stalin was capable of speaking quite
eloquently or wittly, and with apparent
conviction at important party gatherings.
Many of those who underestimated
Stalin came to regret it.
- Ambition
- Stalin gave few indications until the late-1920's that he was
aiming for power, had risen to prominence under Lenin not
because he was regarded as a potential leader, but because
her was a good second ranked party man who they could
count on to 'get things done', whilst more intellectual
members debated policies and decisions
- Historians working back from the 1930's and trying to explain Stalin's
rise to power credit him with unbridled ambition or a lust for power.
- Luck
- Stalin, like many successful
politicians enjoyed some luck,
especially in his rise to power in the
party and eventually the USSR.
- One of the most crucial instances was after Lenin's death, when his
colleagues (Trotsky) decided not to publish Lenin's will, this
contained a damning criticism of Stalin, including references to the
rough way in which he treated comrades. And a call to remove Stalin
from his leading positions in the party. If this would of been
published it would most likely of been the end of Stalin's career.
- Key Profiles
- Grigori Zinoviev
- Zinoviev was with Lenin in exile
until April 1917, he then joined
Kamanev in opposing Lenin's call
for an uprising. Between 1918 and
1926, Zinoviev was influential as
the head of the Leningrad party
organisation. He was allied with
Kamanev first against Trotsky, and
then with Trotsky and Kamanev in
the United oppositon against
Stalin after Lenin's death.
- Zinoviev was tried and
imprisoned in 1935,
given another trial in
1936 and then executed
with Kamenev.
- Advantages in the
struggle for power
- One of the party's best speakers
- Regarded as intelligent,
energetic and with a wide
knowledge of European culture
- An 'Old Bolshevik'
and therefore
commanded respect
from colleagues
- One of Lenin's closest
associates, regarded by him
as his 'closest and most
trusted assistant'
- Had important and
influential positions in
the Politburo and
Leningrad party
- Disadvantages in the
struggle for power
- Gained a reputation for inconsistency, seen in
his oppositon to Lenin in 1917 and switching
alliances between Stalin and Trotsky.
- Seriously underestimated his
opponents, especially Stalin
- Seen as an ambitious
compromiser, without a clear
philosophy , someone who was
lacking in political courage and
buckled under pressure.
- Lev Kamanev
- Returned to Petrograd in 1917,
where he allied with Zinoviev,
after Lenin became ill in 1922,
Kamanev joined Zinoviev and
Stalin in opposing Trotsky. He
had a power base in Moscow but
by 1927 he had lost this and
Stalin ended his political career.
He supported Stalin at the 1934
17th Party Congress, this didn't
save him he was arrested after
the Kirov ass assassination, given
a show trial and executed in
1936.
- Advantages in the struggle for power
- Had influence in Moscow
where he ran a local party
- An 'Old Bolshevik', who
helped form policy and
was close to Lenin
- Disadvantages in the struggle for power
- seriously underestimated his
oppenents especially Stalin
- Regarded by too many as
soft, without the wish or
ability to be a leader
- Similar to Zinoviev, gained a
reputation for inconsistency and
opportunism by opposing Lenin
in 1917 and switching alliances
between Stalin and Trotsky
- Leon Trostky
- Trotsky was prominet in Lenin's new Russis, he
was Commissar for war and served in the
Politburo alongisde Stalin. He played a crucial
part in the civil war, creating the red army and
leading them to victory.
- During Lenin's illness Trotsky
faced an opposition alliance of
Stalin, Zinoviev and Kamenev,
all afraid of Trotsky's influnece
and ambition
- Advantages in the struggle for power
- He had been Lenin's
right hand man
during the revolution
and the Civil war
- Trotsky was clever, a
dynamic speech maker and
had shown himself to be a
man of action from 1917-1921
- He had demonstrated a combination of
formidable leadership skills, ruthlessness and
decision-making abilities during key periods
- Disadvantages in the struggle for power
- Trotsky was
a late convert
to the
Bolsheviks
which made
some 'Old
Bolsheviks'
suspect him
- Trotsky completely
underestimated Stalin
- Trotsky made no attempt to
build a base of support within
the party, a crucial mistake
when it came to party clashes
after Lenin's death. He
couldn't confront party
congresses that where packed
with Stalin's supporters
- He could
be
indecisive
at times
- Made crucial errors of judgement,
he attacked the party bureaucracy
in 1924 when he needed its
support, he also argued against
publicising Lenin's will and
therefore saving Stalin.
- Nikolai Bukharin
- Advantages in the struggle for power
- Intelligent and regarded as the best thinker in the party
- For many years he was a
very close associate of Stalin
and respected by him
- Popular within the party, close to
Lenin, and for a long time friendly with
Trotsky
- Disadvantages in the struggle for power
- In trying to remain
loyal to everyone and
avoiding taking sides
in the factional
in-fighting, he lacked
power base
- Appeared
inconsistent and
underestimated
Stalin
- Naive and lacked the
qualities of intrigue,
making him unsuited to
the internal party fights
- Bukharin was an intellectual and a thinker,
Lenin regarded him as 'the most valuable
theoretician in the party'. After Lenin's death
he alongside Stalin was the most influential
member of the party, he supported Stalin and
opposed Trotsky. he helped Stalin defeat the
left opposition, by 1928 Stalin easily
outmanoeuvered Bukharin due to Stalin
being set on collectivisation
- Mistakes or miscalculations by others
- With all of Stalin's talent,
determination, slight luck
and ambition, his rise to
power was considerably
aided by the mistakes
and shortcomings of his
opponents, and their
weaknesses that he
exploited fully
- At the time, Trotsky
seemed the most likely
rival for power, because he
had been Lenin's right
hand man during the
revolution and aftermath
of the Civil War, and in that
period seemed a larger
figure than Lenin himself,
however Stalin crushed
him by the mind 1920's.
- Stalin's defeat of the Left and
Right opposiiton and
establishment of personal rule
between 1924 and 1929
- The defeat of the Left
- Following Trotsky's attack on the party bureaucracy
in 1924, Stalin allied himsefl with Zinoviev and
Kamenev against Trotsky, still seen after Lenin's
death as a potential threat to the new regime
- Trotsky argued for permanent revolution, which meant
a focus on encouraging and helping revolutions abroad,
so that the USSR would not be an isolated revolutionary
state, alone in a hostile world
- In 1925, Stalin began to champion the policy of 'Socialism in one
country', which meant the USSR concentration on developing its
strenght and following its own path to Socialism, making itself
formidable enough to hostile Capitalist States
- Trotsky attacked Stalin's ideas and
joined Kamanev and Zinoviev in the
United or Left opposition, this alliance
argued for a more rapid transition
from the NEP to a socialist State,
which meant a commitment to rapid
industriaisation.
- It was now that Stalin's growing power in the party proved invaluable
- In 1926, the Left opposition failed to get its policies accepted at
the 15th Party Conference due to Stalin's large support base.
This signaled the start of the rapid decline of the Left
opposition, who could no longer voice their opinions publically.
- The Left's leaders were expelled
from their official positions and
from the Politburo. although
Zinoviev and Kamenev remained in
the party they were effectively
silenced , Trotsky would not be
silenced and was sent into internal
exile before being forced to the
leave the USSR for good in 1929
- The defeat of the Right
- Stalin overcame the left by using his
power base in the party and with
support of the right, led by
Bukharion,Rykov and Tomsky.
- The defeat of the left removed any dependence
Stalin might have had on the right, by 1928 and
Trotsky and the left effectively out of the
picture, Stalin committed to rapid
industrialisation, the policy previously of the
left, when the right opposed Stalin's decision he
got rid of leaders and removed them from the
Politburo, Stalin was now effectively leader of
the USSR