Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Why did Labour
lose the 1951
election?
- Sir Stafford Cripps 1947-1950
- Association with the age of austerity
- Daily Express: "while he knew
so much about economics,
he knew so little about
human beings"
- Tarnished image by the end of time in administration
- Devaluation of £ from
£4.86: $1 to £2.80:$1
- Rationing increasingly unpopular with middle classes
- Eg. British housewives
league at peak had 100,000
members
- Alongside this was the memory from
Hugh Dalton's administration of the
1946/47 winter which had dire food/ fuel
shortages
- Korean War ... World economic
downfall 1950
- Balance of Payments record:
1950 Surplus £297 million fell to
£419 million in 1951
- Fear of nuclear war
- Increase in defence expenditure by £4.7 billion
- Issues rose in
regards to labours
priorities
- Nationalisation
- Coal mining-1947
Public transport -1948
electricity-1948
gas-1949
- Ideological rather than practical?
- The Iron and coal industries were not profitable
and were in decline - government supporting
failing industries.
- Sugar / Water really necessary?
- Iron and steel nationalisation
highly controversial and cost
large amounts in payouts
- To the tune of £2.7 billion
- Labours 1950 manifest included
nationalisation of a 'ragbag
assortment of industries'
- Following clause IV
which Gaiskell set out
to change in later
years
- Economic recovery based on US loans?
- Once lend lease had ended in 1945 (end of
WW2) needed loans to sustain economy
- Keynes 1945 secures
£3.7 billion loans US &
£1.5 billion from Canada
however not the £6
billion he had hoped for
- Repayable at
2% interest
rather than 0%
hoped for
- Marshall Aid 1948
Americas way of
protecting against the
'Iron Curtain' and the
threat of Russia (Start
of cold war era)
- Given approx £1.3 billion
- Foreign policy problems
- Violence broke out in India and Paliastine during decolonisation
- Sectarian violence - Violence
between people of different
sects ( religion/ groups)
- Bevin resignation from foreign office
- New role given to Herbert Morrison
- Issue in Iran with Oil efiniry nationalised, wasn't handles
- Election results 1951
Labour 295 (48.8%)
Conservative (48.0%)
Liberals 6
- Note how Labour actually achieved a
higher percentage of votes ...
disadvantaged by 1st Past post
system
- Tory gains
made in
marginal
seats
- Gained from 1948 boundary changes
- Alongside the abolishment of
plural voting- 1948
Representation Of The Peoples
Act
- Attlee was aware that these changes to the voting system may
disadvantage the Labour party however he did not postposne them
until after the election on the grounds of "morality" which was the
fundamentals he based his politics.
- Postal voting also
favoured
Conservatives 1 to 10
- Election of 1950
Labour 315
Conservatives 290
- 1950-51 Labour were in office
however without power or
authority
- 1950-1951 labelled as an
UNHAPPY PARLIAMENT
- Labour majority
reduces to just 7
seats 1950
- By changing the timing of the election to be in 1951 rather than
spring of 52' due to the Kings tour of Australia it hit the party at a
time of economic downfall- seen to be short lived as by 1952 the
£419 million defecit was yet again in the surplus
- Ministers
- Disagreements over
ideology and how
socialist the party
should remain
- Bevan an Labour
fundamentals called for further
social reform and nationalisation
- Bevin's speech 1948 where he referred to
the Tories as 'lower than vermin' alienated
support for the party.
- Majority of party
called for
'consolidation'
- Supported by H. Morrison
- Division also came as Bevan was resentful in
not gaining the role of foreign sec- given to H.
Morrison, was moved to minister of employment
- Proposed introduction of
prescription charges by Hugh
Gaitskell 1950
- Resignation of Bevan,
Wilson and Freeman
- Bevan failed to accept compromised proposed by
Gaitskell, would gut defence expenditure by £400
million if some charged could be made on
spectacles and dentures
- Aged - many were in 60s
and been in government
for over 10 years...
- Conservative campaign
- MORE RED MEAT
- SET PEOPLE FREE
- Home building promised to be expanded, from the Labour 200,000 homes per year to 300,000 year
- Churchill as leader
- Nostalgia from wartime
leadership remembered in a
positive light
- Presented themselves as a united
party opposed to the split labour
- His limited standing within the House of
commons meant that there was an
opportunity for the other Conservative
ministers to show their political competence
- Work of Butler in transforming the
conservatives into a modern party,
accepting the ideas of NHS and that
social reforms were needed. - NEW
CONSERVATISM
- The industrial charter of 1947 & This Is
The Road Manifesto 1950 accepted
Labours changes
- The Spectator wrote: The conservatives of
1950 are not the Conservatives of 1935
- No one shoots Santa Clause -
response of Tory MP to
keeping the NHS
- Attractive party to businessmen
which led to more sophisticated
propaganda
- The view that another Labour
administration would lead to
excessive class orientated
legislation
- Commitment to full employment and a mixed economy
- Labour campaign
- Said to focus upon its previous
achievements - 200,000 homes built a
year ect. and failed to outline their
future plans
- Hugh Gaitskell 1950-51
- Budget of 1951 heavily criticised by
Labour paper the Tribune
- Paul Adleman points out
how the radical Labour
was really in their early
years of the
administration (up to
1947)
- 1951 manifesto did not
mention SOCIALISM
- Corelli Barnett's Audit of War criticised how
there had been limited industrial reform and
that there was a missed opportuinty for
Britain to become a world exporting power,
however we spent the time on social reform.
She believed that Social changes should come
second - 1986