Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Green Crime
- Defined by Nigel South as a 'crime against the environment'
- Linked to globalisation - regardless of transnational
boundaries the planet is one unified eco-system. It is not
local.
- Green crime goes beyond political borders
- Beck (1992): Global Risk Society.
Risks in the modern era are
man-made/manufactured and so we
cannot predict the consequences
- E.g. fracking. We need oil + gas but the
fracking process could lead to ground
collapse or earthquakes
- Examples of green crime include:
- Primary Crimes: crimes where the
environment itself is damaged
- air pollution
- species extinction
- water pollution
- Bush fires
- deforestation
- Secondary Crimes: crimes that come
out of conflict between humans and
the environment, but are not defined
as harm to the environment
- dumping of hazardous waste
- fly tipping
- state violence against oppositional groups
- Traditional green criminology
- focuses on green crime that
has broken environmental law.
- interested in regulations
concerning the environment
- Situ and Emmons (2000):
define environmental crime as
'an unauthorised act or
omission that violates the law'
- investigates the patterns and causes of
law breaking
- Structuralist + positivist
- Contemporary green criminology
- More concerned with
the idea of harm than
criminal law. They are
interested in the
study of zemiology
(study of social
harms)
- Link to Beck
- White (2008): 'proper' criminology is
about action which is deviant or harmful
but does not necessarily break the law
- aka transgressive criminology
because it crosses the boundaries
between law breaking and new issues
of harm
- criminal law is relative to each country so the
same harmful environmental action may not
be a crime in one country but it is in another.
- Legal definitions cannot provide a consistent
standardisation of harm and definitions of
green crime are affected by political processes
- contemporary green criminologists
have developed a global perspective
on environmental harm. These
sociologists are cultural sociologists.
- Transnational organisations adopt an anthropocentric view of environmental
harm which means they believe that humans have the right to dominate
nature for their own gain. Economic growth comes before the environment.
- link to Marxism
- Toxic waste is sold to developing nations to be
disposed of which contributes to eco-poverty.
- link to Marxism
- Evaluation
- Strengths
- recognises the growing
importance of
environmental issues
and the need to address
the harms and risks of
environmental damage,
both to humans and the
environment
- Weaknesses
- it is hard to define
the boundaries of the
study of green crime
because it focuses on
broader concerns of
harms rather than
simply on legally
defined crimes
- defining the
boundaries of
green crime
involves making
moral judgements
- Positivist critics would argue
that the study of green crime is
a matter of values and cannot
be established objectively
- Marxism and green crime
- green crime is an act of power
- the RC shape and define the law to
benefit their own exploitative interests
on the environment
- green crime is focused on a smaller scale
to detract from large organisations
- Laws benefit transnational corporations
- Eco feminism
- believe in an
ecocentrc view that
people, particularly
women, are
interdependent with the
environment
- environmental harm hurts humans too
- both the environment and humans are liable to exploitation, especially by global capitalism
- the earth is oppressed and exploited in the way that women face
patriarchy. Men are to blame for environmental harm. Women do
not harm the earth due to their 'natural' and maternal instincts