The 3 Approaches to Argument

The Classical Approach to Argument
1. 1.) Introduction
  1. you must get grap their attention
  2. you have to make them think about your side
  3. Some people say that gymnastics is just like cheerleting maybe easyer
2. 2.) Statement of Background
  1. talk about the key evnets thet led up to the evnet
  2. gymnastics is a sport that takes foces balance and hard work
3. 3.) Proposition
  1. show the side you are on
  2. have a way your going to argu
  3. gymnastics is a incredablely difficue to do yes cheerliting is hard but gymnastics has got it bet
4. 4.) Proof
  1. tell them why you are on side your on
  2. give them evidence
  3. gymnastics has more rule that must be followed to where cheerleading they're are not as many rules they have to follow the skills they do are at about a level 8 level
5. 5.) Refutation
  1. touch on the ideas that the other side has
    1. give evidence that your side is the only right side
  2. as a cheerleader they have to lift each other up and through them in the are 'stunts' as to were gymnastics dont have to stund we just do the tumlbing
6. 6.) Conclusion
  1. summarize the points that are important to your case
    1. so use emotanal appeal
    2. pathos
    3. show the value of your side
  2. the fact that they very tealnted and brave. yet gymnastics is harder then cheerleading the mental difficules are so greater then cheering they are amazing they are just more of a show as gymnastics it a inceradable talent
The Toulmin Approach to Argument
1. 1.) Clam
  1. your point your going to make
  2. the side your on
  3. I should be aloud to go on a road trip with my friends
2. 2.) Grounds
  1. evidence supporting your side
  2. a magorited of the parantes of the seinor at WRHS let there kids og on a filled trip
  3. respond to the claim
3. 3.) Warrant
  1. connect the data to the clam
  2. my Parantes should be as the migrated of the the parents at WRHS
  3. G A S C A P
    1. Generalization
    2. Analogy
    3. Sign
    4. Causatity
    5. Authority
    6. Principle
  4. Common Warrants
    1. Argument from Principle
    2. Argument from Authority
    3. Causal Argument
The Rogerian Approach to Argument
1. 1.) Introduction
  1. what are you going to be arguing
  2. Should students have home work
2. 2.) Summary of Opposing Views
  1. to argu both sides
  2. some argu that homework is good for the students that it gives more practice on the work and some say that it is not good that the students had 6 hours of school and now they have sports and they dont have time
3. 3.) Statement of Understanding
  1. show how the other side is right and wrong
  2. homework is a very good way to give the student away to better understand of the work they are doing and to get more practics at it to. sometimes the the students understand and so doing the work is redundent and on top of that the have all ready spent like 6 hours at school and now they have sports and other activists to do and studying for a class they don't under stand.
4. 4.) Statement of Your Position
  1. what is your opinion on the topic
  2. i say that homework is not good the students may not put as much effort in to the work because they are tiered and had just got home from work practices and just don't want to do it and so the just kinda do it just to get credit for doing it
5. 5.) Statement of Contexts:
  1. to give your opinion with some what facts
  2. Just because you do your homework does not mean you know what you are doing you could have copied it someone gave the andwsers to you and just be cause you dont do it doesnt me you dont know what your doing
6. 6.) Statement of Benefits
  1. to give the reader a reason to belive them
  2. if you are able to help the student step by step in class then there is no need for the homework and then give them more time in class

Nächster

The 3 Approaches to Argument

Beschreibung

Zusammenfassung der Ressource

ähnlicher Inhalt

	Erstellt von 1024486 vor etwa 9 Jahre