Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Defending North America
- Canada's Acceptance of Nuclear Weapons in 1963
- For
- Lester B. Pearson, the leader of the Liberals, declared his support of
acquiring nuclear weapons in order to meet the obligations of Canada’s
NATO and NORAD agreements.
- According to Minister of National Defence Douglas Harkness, “it was unreasonable to
secure the Bomarc without the nuclear warhead.” He though that nuclear weapons were
crucial in protecting Canada from communist attacks.
- Many business leaders and newspapers feared that not
cooperating with the United States would damage US-Canada
relations in trade and investment.
- Canada’s acceptance of nuclear weapons assured voters that
it would improve the country’s relations with the United
States.
- Canadian strategist R.J. Sutherland argued that if Canada did not
accept nuclear weapons, it would be breaking commitments that it
had made to its allies, and would thus lose influence with them
- Against
- Canada had the right to decide for itself
on international matters and not always
follow the United Startes' footsteps.
- Many Canadian citizens thought objected to the use of
nuclear weapons. In fact, Diefenbaker received many letters
and petitions from citizens about the issue.
- The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Howard Green, felt that Canada should be a
non-nuclear nation because If Canada uses nuclear missiles, its defense plan
would be inconsistent with its foreign policy.
- The more countries accepted nuclear weapons, the more
likely was the outcome of a nuclear war, which some
thought would destroy civilization.
- Canada's Prime Minister Diefenbaker and US president
Kennedy were not having good relations at the time.
- The Scrapping of the Avro Arrow
- For
- Canada could not afford the
costs of the airplane. One
aircraft costed $12.5 million.
- According to "History of the Canadian Peoples", no
one, not even the Canadian Air Force, wanted to buy
it.
- The Arrow cost six times more to produce than
the American interceptor aircraft.
- The Arrow cost six times more to produce than
its American counterpart.
- Against
- Test flights of the Arrow showed that the plane could be the
world's fastest and most advanced interceptor. Canada lost an
opportunity to establish itself as a technological leader.
- The scrapping of the Avro Arrow
put Avro out of business and
ended the company.
- At the time, we were in the top three of the largest aircraft
producers in the world, but the cancellation of the Arrow
devastated the Canadian aerospace industry.
- Fifteen thousand people lost their jobs at Avro, and
like a chain reaction, many more people outside of
the company lost their jobs too.
- Prime Minister John Diefenbaker
and his ministers simply hated the
project because it was initiated by
the Liberals.
- Canada's Role in the Cuban Missile Crisis
- For
- By refusing to alert Canada's NORAD forces or to allow US planes land
on Canadian bases, Diefenbaker wanted to defend Canada's independence.
- Canada's Prime Minister Diefenbaker and US
president Kennedy were not having good relations at
the time.
- The United States had no proof on what was
happening in Cuba other than photographs.
It is understandable that Diefenbaker wanted
more direct proof.
- Diefenbaker did not want Canada to be drawn
into a major conflict that seemed mainly
US-based in policy and interest.
- The Canadian government was also concerned that
placing its military on alert might provoke the Soviet
Union.
- Against
- After Diefenbaker made his decision, a poll showed
that 80% of Canadians disagreed with his choice
because many Canadians were beginning to favor
nuclear weapons in Canada.
- It damaged US-Canada relations.
- Canada ended up readying Canadian forces anyway, so
Diefenbaker could have followed Kennedy's wishes earlier and
avoid some of the consequences he had to face.
- As in other events, Diefenbaker’s judgment was clouded by his
personal loathing of Kennedy.