Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Security Council
- The Security Council is the executive body of the United Nations :
- Primary responsibility is the maintenance of international peace
- IT IS COMPOSED OF 15 MEMEBERS : 5 PERMANET AND 10 NON- PERMANAT MEMBERS ELECTED BY THE GENERAL assembly FOR A TERM OF TWO YEARS
Anmerkungen:
- ssa was a member of the council of the league of Nations but because of the racial policies was not selected to serve on the security council during apartheid.
SA WAS ELECTED AS A NON-PERMANENT MEMBER OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL FOR 2007&2008 AND AGAIN IN 2011
- THE 5 PERMANENT MEMBERS ARE : CHINA; FRANCE; RUSSIA ; UK AND USA
- THE SECURITY COUNCIL WAS CONSTITUTED IN 1945 AND THE PERM MEMBERS REFLECTED POWER RELATIONS OF THE TIME
- TODAY GERMANY AND JAPAN HAVE MORE CLAIM TO BE PERM MEMBERS THAN OTHER COUNTRIES
- AT PRESENT THERE ARE SERIOUS EFFORTS TO CHANGE THE COMPISITION
- THE INCLUSION WOULD BE BASED ON STATES WHICH CONTRIBUTE THE MOST; MILITARILY AND DIPLOMATICALLY
- THE SECURITY COUNCIL IS EMPOWERED TO TAKE DECISIONS BINDING ON ALL MEMEBER STATES
- VETO POWER IS VESTED IN THE 5 PERMANENT MEMEBERS
- ARTICLE 27(3) WHILE DECESIONS ON PROCEDURAL MATTERS IN THE COUNCIL ARE MADE BY AN AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF 9 MEMEMBERS
- DECISIONS ON ALL MATTERS ARE TO BE MADE BY AN AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF 9 MEMBERS INCLUDING CONCURRING VOTES OF THE PERMNENT MEMBERS
- THIS VETO HAS BEEN INVOKED BY ALL THE PERM MEMBERS WHENTHEY PERCIEVE THEIR INTERESTS TO BE THREATENED
- THE VETO HAS BEEN AMELIORATED BY THE PRACTISE OF ABSENTION. IT IS NOTVIEWED AS VETO AND HAS ALLOWED MANY RESOLUTIONS
- LAWFULNESS OF ABSENTION HAS BEEN CHALLENGED EXAMPLE THE NAMABIA SA SITUATION
- ABSENTION MAY BE REAGRDED AS A CONCURRING VOTE IF THE MEMBER IS PRESENT AT THE SC
- IT IS MORE DIFFICULT WHEN THE PERM MEMBER IS ABSENT FROM SC