Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Features of UK Cities and Urban and Rural Change
- Definitions
- Urbanisation= An increase in the proportion of people
living in urban areas compared to rural areas
- Suburbanisation= Expansion of human populations away
from central urban areas into the outskiurts of cities, and
people are usually dependent on commuting here
- Urban= An urban area is abuilt-up area such as a town or a city
- Rural= An area in the countryside
- Brownfield sites= Sites that have previously been built upon, ususally for industrial uses
- Greenfield site= Areas of land, usually agricultural or rural land,
which are being considered for urabn development
- Counter-urbanisation= When lrage proportions of people move away
from urban areas into rural areas or the countryside
- Re-urbanisation= Usually the government's initiative to
counter the problem of inner city decline (gentrification)
- Infill= Use of land within a built-up area for further construction
- Standard of living= A measure of a person's
income as well as their jobs/qualifications
- Deprivation= Measures standard of living as
well as the conditions of the local
environment and community safety
- Cardiff
- Has a population of 350,000
- Industrialisation happened between 1850 and 1920 so there were more docks and
ports and more terraced houses were built for workers in the inner city
- Suburbansiation happened between 1930 and the 1980s due to an
increase in car ownership, causing a suburban sprawl
- In 1970 Bute East Dock closed down
- Between the 1980s and today new housing was built
on brownfiedl sites and caused re-urbanisation
- Reasons and Impacts of Urban and Rural Change
- Rural
- There are not enough jobs in the local area
- Jobs are not highly skilled in
rural areas so people with a
lot of skills struggle to find
jobs here
- Public transport is
irregular and unreliable
- Urban
- More people are moving away so
shops in urban areas close down
so there is a decrease in the
number of facilities in town,
causing counterurbanisation
- The decreasing population of towns
has caused a negative multiplier
effect+ led to social decline
- Rise of car ownership
means that people can
easily commute to work
so they live in commuter
settlements
- Commuter settlements
- Made up of a community of people living in rural areas who
travel to work normally in urban areas
- Case study: Llantwit Major
- Available housing- More barns are being converted in modern,
availabkle and desirable housing. Expensive, moderna and
planned estates built to cater to new residents
- Services and facilities- Llantwit Major has many amenities (2 supermarkets, a
doctor's surgery, schools), which is convenient for residents
- Accessibility- It is only located 40
minutes from Cardiff so there is a short
travel distance for commuters
- Thus, more people have moved to Llantwit Major
and it has become a commuter settlement
- Changes to Commuting
- There has been a rise in commuting
- House prices in rural areas are cheaper
compared to urban areas so people are more
willing to live in rural areas and commute
- The availability of good 3G and 4G signals and
free wifi in public transport has meant that
people can use tech on transport services for
work or entertainment, increasing their
productivity
- Urban land use models
- The Burgess Model
- Land is of the highest value in
the centre of a city
- The CBD is at the centre and has
the most expensive land. It
contains many commercial centres,
businesses and malls. This is the
financial centre
- The inner city has mainly terraced, low-value
houses and is where industrial workers used
to live. Unemployment and crime is rife here
- The inner suburbs contains
mainly semi-detached houses
and have gardens. Many
commuters love here and
there are facilities such as
supermarkets.
- The outer suburbs is found at the edge of
the urban area and is where town meets
country. It contains land such as golf
courses, business parks and residential
areas. The houses are large, detached and
spacious with large gardens
- Limitations of the Burgess Model
- The model is quite old and may not apply to all cities
- It does not take into account mass car
ownership or commuter settlements
- Many inner cities have been regenerated
and have had improved environments
- The Hoyt Model
- Contains sectors of land in wedges
- Takes physical features into account
- Takes motorways and railways into account due
to expanding residential areas and industry
- Spheres of Influence
- Case Study- The Millennium Stadium
- Positive
- Provides jobs and opportunities to
the locals, especially the youth
- Attracts tourists, who purchase goods from local
businesses and hence boost the local economy
- Provided facilities and
entertainment for locals to enjoy
- Negative
- Locals are exposed to high levels of noise pollution
- There could be an increase in crime
and fights, especially during the night
at pubs
- An increase in litter and pollution due to more tourists
- Factors affecting the spheres of influence
- Accessibility- A shop that has better links to the
railways and motorway means that people would
travel to the shop from a greater distance
- Competition- Having more
competition from other
shops decreases a sphere of
influence as it means that
people have more options to
shop from and are less
likely to purchase products
from your shop
- Size of settlement- A larger shop is
likely to have more products available
so more customers would be attracted
to the shop and would purchase more
goods, increasing the range of the shop
- Multiculturalism in Cardiff
- Benfits
- More businesses are set up so more
shopping choices for the locals
- Immigrants take up the less desirable
jobs that the locals don't want
- Immigrants pay taxes, which
improves the economy
- Somali migrants in Cardiff
- There are now 10,000 Somalis in Cardiff
- Many moved between 1800 and
the 1930s to find work as sailors
in Butetown
- There are many mosques and halal butchers
set up in areas with concentrated migrants
- Sustainable Development
- Sustainability- Meeting the needs of
current generations without
compromising the future generations
- Case Study- BedZED
- This is the UK's first
sustainable community and is
its largest eco community
- All BedZED homes used 90% less
energy for heating
- Renewable materials are used to build
homes eg timber from rainforests
- There are 40 electric car charge points
- Most residents cycle to work
- There is a sense of
community and
familiarity in the
community (most people
know at least 20
neighbours)
- Sedum roofs are used with plants to increase
biodiversity+ to naturally filter the water
- Cons
- The project was expensive
- The heating unit failed so it had to be reconstrcuted
- Changing land uses
- There is an increased demand for housing
+deindustrialisation took place in cities
- Reasons
- Rise in divorce rates means that families
live in two dwellings instead of one
- The ageing population means that more houses
are needed for the younger generation
- Mortgage companies have offered
100% loans, making it easier for
younger people to buy homes
- Rural Housing Challenges
- The Lake District (see retail and leisure)
- Very few council homes available-
the poorest won't have any
residential areas to live in, driving
the poorest away from rural areas
- Increased cost of living- Less people
can afford to buy houses and will be
driven put so the rural social
environment can decline
- More people buying second
homes- more empty houses
would be present+ more
houses would be taken up,
causing a lack of housing
and villages can lose their
distinct characteristics
- Brownfield site case study- Ipswitch
- Why it was redeveloped
- Increasing population so
higher demand for housing
- It was derelict due to
industrial decline so it
makes it safer+ more
visually appealing
- Pros
- People live
closer to
work so
reduced
transport
so better
for
environment
- Habitats are not
destroyed so better
for environment
- Ipswitch
waterfront
increased
the number
of buildings+
residential
areas so
decline in
crime and
increase in
visual appeal
- Cons
- Lots of flood
defences had to be
built, costing £53
million
- Local people unhappy due to
traffic+ noise pollution
- Historic sites had to be protected,
costing £1.2 million per hectare
- Views
- For
- Green Party, resident,
housing minister
- Against
- Resident, employee of
shut down factory
- Greenfield site case study- Oxford
- Why it was redeveloped
- New houses are
needed as demand is
greater than supply
and house prices cost
15x the average pay
of locals so it was
unaffordable
- Lot of people employed
at the university and
lots of students
- Pros
- Greenbelt sites are near
A40 so access is easy
- More houses reduces
prices so more people
move to Oxford
- Recruits more people to the uni
- Sites are aesthetically pleasing
- Cons
- Causes urban sprawl so
nearby villages eg
Wheatley lose their
distinct cultures
- Habitats can be destroyed
- More commuting to
work means that there
is more pollution and
dirty air for locals
- Views
- Against
- Local council member, green
party, local resident
- For
- Local resident, family
wanting to move homes,
housing minister