Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Biological Explanations of Obesity
- Stunkard et al
(1986)
- AO1
- 540 Adult Adoptees from Denmark
- Weight was compared with that of
biological and adoptive parents
- Split into 4 weight classes
- Thin
- Median
- Overweight
- Obese
- AO2
- Strong relationship between weight of
adoptees and biological parents
- No relationship between weight of
adopteesd and their adoptive parents in
any weight class
- Therefore, genetic influences have an important role in
determining adult weight, whilst environment has little effect
- AO3
- Supported by other biological vs adoptive relative
research and by some twin studies
- Too reductionist as it says that genetics alone are
responsible for obesity
- All participants from Denmark, so can't be generalised.
- Wardle et al (2008)
- AO1
- Analysed 5092 twin pairs aged 8 - 11.
- Compared in terms of BMI and waist
circumference.
- AO2
- Heritability figure of 77%
- Relatively small environmental factor
- Environmental factors were 50% shared (same home, parents), 50%
non-shared.
- AO3
- Limited age range - can apply to pediatric obesity but not in adults
- Large sample size (10184), so more reliable and generalisable
- Sample is only from UK, so cannot generalised to other cultures
- Reductionist, suggests that genes play the majority of the role in obesity, and there is
very little else that affects
- Deterministic, suggests that we do not have free will over
whether we get obese or not, is all decided by genes +
environment
- Frayling et al
(2007)
- AO1
- Researched FTO (fat
mass and obesity)
gene
- AO2
- People with two copies of this genes
had a 70% increased risk of obesity
- People with a single copy had a 30% increased risk
- AO3
- Deterministic - suggested that genes cause us to be obese, no free will
- Reductionist - suggests that genes only decide whether we get obese
- Supported by Price et al (2008) so increased validity,