Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Family Diversity
- Modernism and the Nuclear Family
- Functionalism
- The traditional nuclear family is
the best fit for modern society-
opposed to family diversity
- The "Cereal Packet Family"- the family has moved away
from being extended, and is now isolated & nuclear
- Many institutions now fulfil
those roles e.g. NHS, benefits
- Evaluation- McGlone: the extended family is
helpful and supportive (mainly in working
class due to unemployment and poverty)
- The New Right
- Opposed to family diversity, they believe the
traditional nuclear family is the only type of
family children should be brought up
- Charles Murray- single
parent household are the
most important social issue
of our time
- They base it on biological
differences and there should be
a clear cut division of labour
- Evaluation- Ann Oakley: the traditional family is
based on the oppression of women, Weeks: sexual
and family diversity are now widely accepted
- Cohabitation vs Marriage
- Benson- couples are more stable when
they marry as it requires deliberate
commitment, cohabiting avoid
commitment and responsibilties
- Neo-Conventional Family
- Chester- sees the nuclear family as dominant
(like functionalist) but both spouses play an
"instrumental" role- dual earning
- Types of Family Diversity
- Rapoport & Rapoport
- Nuclear family is a minority of families
- Organisational diversity- differences in the way
family roles are organised e.g. joint or segregated
conjugal roles
- Cultural diversity- different cultures, religious and
ethnic groups have different family structures e.g.
higher proportion of female-headed families
among Afro-Caribbean households
- Social class diversity- differences are partly the result of
income differences between households of different classes
- Life-stage diversity- differ according to
the stages reached in the life cycle e.g.
newlyweds, children, retired couple
- Generational diversity- old vs young generations
have different attitudes and experiences that
reflect the historical periods of time they’ve lived
in (different views on morality and divorce)
- Postmodernism
- Diversity and fragmentation- people can “pick and mix” their
identities and lifestyles for a wide range of choices
- Rapid social change- new technologies have
transformed our patterns of work and
leisure- makes life less predictable
- David Morgan
- No point in making large-scale
generalisation (functionalist)
- He prefers family practises rather than structure-
members participate by constructing a life course &
relationships with family due to their own decisions
- David Cheal- society has entered a new,
chaotic, postmodern stage- family structure is
fragmented and diverse (greater choice)
- Individualisational Thesis
- Giddens
- “Pure relationship”- they exist solely to
meet the needs of each partner and
continue so long as it succeeds in doing so
- Same-sex relationships are leading the
way towards new family types &
creating more equal relationships
- Beck
- Risk society- tradition has less influence
and people have more choice
- Previous generations had more fixed
roles and didn't take any risks
- The negotiated family- there's now greater
gender equality and individualism, so we
now calculate the risks and rewards of
different actions and decisions
- The zombie family- it
appears to be alive,
but is dead
- Criticisms
- Exaggerates how much choice
people have, however norms
limit freedom- religion, finances
- The Connectedness Thesis
- Personal Life Perspective
- Smart- The Connectedness Thesis: choices
are made "within a web of connectedness"
- Finch and Mason- although individuals can (to some
extent) negotiate the relationships they want,
they’re embedded within family connections &
obligations that restrict freedom of choice
- Giddens "pure relationship"- families include more than the
couples he focused on- relationships aren't always pure e.g.
parents who separated stay in touch for the children