Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Social Influence
- Conformity
- Asch (1956)
LAB
- 3 line test
- All confederates
- 36.8% of participants
conformed
- Without confederate tricks
they got 99% correct
- Variation: more difficult
task (higher conformity)
- 1956 anti-communism
didn't want to be different
- Collectivist cultures showed higher
conformity than independent ones
- Women more compliant
- Explanations
- Normative social
influence (NSI)
- Want to be liked
- Part of a group
- Research evidence: Garandeau
and Cillessen Bully manipulation
- Informational social
influence (ISI)
- Want to be correct
- Look towards experts
- Crisis or
ambiguous situation
- Research evidence: Witterbrink
and Henly found they implanted
racist majority views
- Social Impact Theory (SIT)
- Number
- Strength
- Immediacy
- Research evidence: Sedikide and
Jackson high strength and
immediacy
- Obedience
- Milgram (1963)
LAB
- Punishment
affects learning
- 40 participants
- Learner confederate
- 12.5% stopped
at 300V
- 65% continued to 400V
- Variations
- Proximity further (Authority)
- Obedience dropped
- Proximity closer (Victim)
- Obedience dropps
- Allies
- withdrew with
confederates
- Internal validity (suspected fake)
- External validity (holocaust etc.)
- Ethics (deception)
- Explanations
- Gradual commitment
- Foot in the
door technique
- Milgram 15V incriments
- Agentic shift
- Autonomous and agentic state
- Lower morality
- Monocausal e.g. holocaust
- Excuse not explanation
- Buffers
- Physical buffer e.g.
being in a different room
increases obedience
- Resisting
- Conformity
- Allies
- Fellow dissenter
allows them to see
reality
- Minor consequences
lower conformity
- Women conform
more than men
- Obedience
- Status - of
authority figure
and location
- Proximity - obedience
decreased with sight of
the victim
- Educational
differences and
religion factored
- Lower morality =
more likely to obey
- Minority Influence
- Attention - being exposed
to conflict of majority
view
- Suffragettes used
similar tactics
- Conflict - causes us to
examine their POV more
deeply
- Augmentation principle - if its
risky to say something it's
more beleivable
- Suffragettes -
Cat & Mouse act
- Only creates potential
change, often aren't taken
seriously