Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Feminist perspective
on social policy
- Conflict view
- Social institutions including the state
and policies benefits men and help
maintain women's subordinate
position in the family
- Social policy built upon family
generalisations and so reinforces that
type of family at expense of others
- Policies benefiting
married but not
cohabiting is an
incentive to get
married
- Creates self-fulfilling prophecy
- Cereal Packet
families are what
policy is based on
- Tax and benefits policies often go to men
as they are the assumed wage earner
- Courts assume
custody of children
should go to mother
- May seem to benefit
but actually hinder
- Maternity leave is longer
than paternity suggesting
women are the natural carers
- Child benefits go to
women - assumes
they are carers
- Criticisms
- Not all social
policies
maintain
hierarchy
- Equal Pay
Act, Sex
Discrimination
Act
- Gender
regimes
- Social
policies
different
around the
world so
effect family
in different
ways
- Traditional 'familistic'
gender regimes
- Base
policies
on
nuclear
family
- Greece
- Little welfare state
or publicly funded
childcare
- Women
rely on
help from
extended
kin
- Traditional division
of labour
- 'Individualistic'
gender regimes
- Base policies
on equality
between men
and women
- Each partner
entitled to
separate state
benefits
- Sweden
- Joint conjugal roles,
both economic assets
- Equal
opportunities
policies,
state
provision on
childcare
- EU countries moving
towards individualistic
- March or progress
towards gender equality