Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Theft
- Theft act 1968
- Theft Act
1978
- Theft (amendment)
act (1978)
- Fraud Act 2006
- A person is guilty of theft if he
dishonestly appropriates
property belonging to another
with the intention of permenantly
deprivinng him of it (s.1 1
- Appropriation (3(1)
- Vital component of Actus
reus----definition: take, acquire,
obtain, grab, seize, steal, get, rob,
pinch etc
- any assumption by a person of of the
rights of an owner amounts to an
appropriation, and this include where he
has come by the property (innocently
- rights of the owner
- Selling it
- destroying it
- Using it
- hiring it
- possesing it
- consuming it
- lending it
- or not) without stealing it, any later
assumption of a right to it by keeping
or dealing with it as a owner
- offering items for sale that belong
to another person is appropriation
(Pitham v Hehl)
- grabbing a handbag is
appropriation even if it falls to the
floor (Corcoran v Anderson)
- assumption of any single
right will suffice (R v Morris)
- theft can still take place even it
the owner consents i.e. by
decpetion (Gomez)
- no need to show that there
was consent (Lawrence)
- immaterial whether the acts were done
with the victims consent or authority
(Hinks) low iq victim who lavished gifts
- if a cheque is fake, the property is obtained by
deception and thus appropriated by the buyer
(Dobson v General accident and fire)
- signing blank cheques does not assume the rights of the
owner but presenting them to be cashed does (Ngan)
- matters little where the defendant is, it matters
where the act of appropriation took place (Governer
of Brixton Prison ex parte Levin)
- if property is purchased in good faith, the
'owner' is not guilty of theft (s.3(2))
- Property s.4
- 'includes money and all other
property real or personal, including
things in action and other intangible
property (s.4(1)
- Land, Currency, cars,
jewellery, information,
bank account, rights
- body parts are also
property (Kelly and
Lindsay)
- things that cannot be stolen
- s4(3) wild
mushrooms, flowers,
fruits or foilage
- unless it is picked for reward,
sale or another commercial
purpose
- A wild untamed
creature (s.4(4))
- unless it has been reduced to
possession by another person
- Real Property
- land, property,
building, site, field,
house, factory
- can be stolen in three ways
- trustees, representatives and
liquidators can steal land if acting in
breach of their confidence (s.4(2)(a)
- something that is severed
from the land e.g. bricks,
turf, doors (s.(4)(2)(b)
- tenant can steal fixtures or
structures from the land he is
renting if he appropriates
(s.4(2)(c)
- things in action i.e. causing
anothers bank account to be
debited (kohn)
- Intangible property
- i.e. patent
- Belonging to
another s.5
- Section 5(1)
- possession or control of it
- does not have to be lawful
- defendant can steal his
own property if another
person had possesion or
control over it (Turner)
- any proprietary right or interest
- property received under an
obligation will still belong to the
owner s.5(3)
- important that the defendant was
obliged to deal with the property in a
particular way and then failed to do so
- property received by mistake
- still belong to the original owner
- obligation upon person to restore
property to the original owner (s.5(4)
- Mens Rea of theft
- dishonestly s.2(1)
- not dishonest if:
- appropriates property in the belief that he
has in law the right to deprive the other of it
- appropriates property in the belief that he
would have the others consent if the other knew
- the word belief features in all 3
- if the defendant honestly
holds one of the beliefs, then
he is not dishonest (Turner)
- appropriates property in the belief that the
person to whom the property belongs cannot
be discovered by taking reasonable steps
- should be judgd by the jury
according to standards of
ordinary decent people
(Feely)
- Objective and subjective--view of
the reasonable man then view of
the defendant (Ghosh)
- intention to permenantly
deprive
- his intention is to treat
the thing as his own to
dispose of regardless of
the others rights s6(1)
- dictoniary definition of
dispose of used in Cahill
- widened to include dealing
with in DPP v Lavender
- mere borrowing is never enough to
constitute a guilty mind unless the
intention to return the thing was in
such a change d state that all of the
- goodness or virtue has gone (Lloyd)