Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Parliament
- Sovereignty
- Legally UK Parliament is sovereign
- Source of all political power, no body can
exercise power unless parliament authoriese
- recall any power it had delegated to others
- e.g devolution or the EU
- it can make any
laws it wishes
- its not bound by the actions of previous parliaments
- therefore cannot be bind its successors
- Parliaments political sovereignty has decreased
- power passed to the EU
- EU law is superior to British
law, therefore Parliament
may not pass any law that
contravenes the EU
- however there are areas that the EU
have no influence over at all
- e.g health, transport, tax, education
- some areas the EU has great influence
- e.g agriculture, fisheries, trade and employment rights
- in theory Parliament could withdraw but unlikely
- power of executive has grown
- PM in particular
- especially those with large majorities
- e.g Thatcher + Blair
- Use of referendums
- have taken one of parliaments role
- to make significant changes to constitution
- results are not binding but it would
be politically unwise to ignore them
- Following 1998 Human Rights
Act, parliament has accepted
European Convention on
Human Rights
- act could be repealed, but
parliament treats ECHR as
supreme
- would take extraordinary
circumstances to abolish the Act or
ignore ECHR
- Devolution
- powers have devolved
to Scotland Wales and
Northern Ireland
- could be reclaimed, but highly unlikely in practice
- apart from Northern
Ireland due to security
circumstances there
- Structure of Parliament
- Plenary Sessions
- whole house meets
- normally Commons is only
full once a week at PMQs
- can also be full for controversial bills
- e.g tutition fees/ fox hunting
- often Gvt will expect
backbenchers to vote
- doesn't
mean
they'll
take
part in
relevant
debate
- Legislative Committees
- small groups of MPs assigned to scrutinise
- intended to make Parliament more effective
- recommend amendments however members are whipped
- The government would have a majority on committees in the commons
- Committees of Whole House
- plenary session of either house, norm for HOL, rare for HOC
- only if bill is
significant or
important
- e.g Budget
- Party Whips apply
- Select Committees
- mirror government departments
- elected by all members of HOC
- governing
party will
have
majority of
members
- not whipped
- job to investigate workings/consider
policies + proposed legislation
- Speakers
- oversee debates
- supposed to be neutral,
therefore uncontroversial
- replaced Lord Chancellor
because of lack of power
separation
- Functions
- Legitimisation
- provides consent for legislation
- no bill can become law without parliament consent
- Scrutiny
- Scrutinises legislation, both primary and secondary
- involve making amendments
- represents various interests in society
- Opposition
- government is
forced to
explain itself
- benefits accountability
- Acccountability
- ministers forced to
explain and justify
their policies
- can extend to
opposition
parties
presenting
alternative
opinions
- only a PM can
remove a minister
- expected to expose
government mistakes
- Financial Control
- parliament needs
to approve budget
- Representation
- MPs represent
both party and
manifesto
- Redress of Grievances
- carried out by MPs on behalf of
constituents- investigate
complaints against public
bodies
- Private Members' Legislation
- only way parliament can
propose its own legislation
- Deliberation
- rare instance of parliament
dedicating time to a great
issue of the day
- Reserve Powers
- powers to veto legislation and dismiss a government
- rarely used, potentially grant great power
- government often see a defeat coming and withdraw or changes a bill
- e.g Sunday Trading Bill/allowance
of Gurka settling rights in 2009
- Delay
- usually used
by the Lords
- this means lords are laregly free
from whips, can delay legislation
- gives government time to reflect
- e.g 1991 War Crimes bill-
defeated, 2005 hunting with
dogs act- passed
- House Of Lords
- Significance
- large majorities have
become common
- remaining membership
of Lords has become
more professional i.e
heriditary peers
- more legitimacy-
removal of
hereditary peers
- contains
legal and
human rights
experts
- becoming
more
proactive
- Restrictions
- can only delay
bills, not block
them
- it has no power over finances
- Salisbury convention
- Amendments proposed by
the lords must be
approved by commons
- House Of Commons
- Strengths
- theoretical power
- can amend legislation
- MPs can call ministers to account
- every constituency is represented
- when small/no majority-
commons have power over
governments
- different interest groups can be
represented by different
individuals
- MPs have freedom to
express their own
views
- Weaknesses
- FTPT almost guarantees overall majority
- party loyalty amongst MPS is traditionally strong
- another reason for loyalty is the patronage of the PM