Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Attorney General Reference
- Development of Consent
- Creates exceptions.
Come from Lord Lane
CJ
- Can be used for ABH or
more serious offences
- Issue of public
interest/public policy
- Links to source
- 4
- Links to cases
- Coney 1982
- Fight couldn't be
consented to
- Barnes 2005
Anlagen:
- Confirming exceptions of
Attorney General Reference
- Jones 1982
- Aitken 1992
- Trial
- First Instance
- Aged 18 & 17
- Fighting
- Facial bruising
- Nose bleed
- Aquitted
- Crown court
- Defence
- Both consented
- Over 18 was
(legally) able to
understand
- Under 18 was not (legally)
able to understand
- Issue of public policy
- Court of Appeal
- AG Ref asks for clarification
in this area of law
- Did not matter if it
happened in public or
private
- Mos fights are unlawful
regardless of consent
- It is not in the public's
interest to cause ABH for no
good reason
- Public policy
- Maintenance of
human life is the
most important thing
- Public interest
- Outcome and why
- CPS appealed outcome which
caused legal controversy
- Public Policy
- Public Interest
- Maintenance of
human life is the
most important thing
- R v Brown
- Lord Lane
- Offence Against the Person Act
- Balancing the
degree of harm
to the value of
purpose