Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Unit 1:
Government
and Politics:
The
Constitution
- Definition
- A constitution is a set of rules
which may be written eg USA or
unwritten eg UK
- It sets out the distribution of
power within the political system
- It regulates the
relationship between
political institutions
- It also defines the relationship
between the state and the individual
- Sources
- Statute Law
Anmerkungen:
- Act of Parliament
Enforceable in courts
Example: - Parliament Act 1911 and 1949
Takes precedence over all other sources BUT there are consequences of signing EC Act 1972
- Common Law
Anmerkungen:
- Devlopment of laws through historical tradition and usage
enforced by judges (case law)
Precedent
examples - original law on civil liberties. Most principles replaced by statutes.
- Conventions
Anmerkungen:
- Unwritten rules considered binding on all members of the political communityHowever not legally enforced, operate according to tradition and customRelate to exercise of powers by governmentExample: Fixed term Parliament
- Royal Prerogative
Anmerkungen:
- Prerogative powers of the monarch = set of rules & privilages that in the past were performed by the monarch
By convention: - now performed by ministers, especially PM, in his or her name.
- Works of Authority
Anmerkungen:
- Books by constitutional theorists - cited to establish appropriate procedures e.g Erskine May - Parliamentary practice
Constitutional theorists - have also established historical principles e.g. Blackstone - parliamentary sovereignty
- Treaties and EU Law
Anmerkungen:
- EU law is binding on all members and takes precedent over domestic law
Britian also bound by EU treaties e.g. Amsterdam Treaty 1997
Judgements made in the European Court of Justice
- Types of constitution
- Codified
Anmerkungen:
- For example the USA – single authoritive document
Entrenched – difficult to change
Clearly outlined rules of Branches of Government
Judiciable – the judiciary may be needed to interpret the
meaning of the constitution
- Uncodified
Anmerkungen:
- For example the UK – not authoritive – single tier legal
system.
Not entrenched – easy to change – just needs to pass through legislature (Parliament)
Not judiciable – Supreme Court cannot change laws ratified by the legislature
- Rigid
Anmerkungen:
- In USA, constitutional amendments need:
2/3 majority – congress
Ratified by ¾ states
Supreme Court can affect the meaning of the constitution
through the law
- Flexible
Anmerkungen:
- The UK – it is easier to pass/ change laws through the
legislature.
Example: the Human Rights Act 1998 – means UK constitution
stays up to date.
However some aspect of the constitution resistant to change – such as centralisation or government
- Unitary
Anmerkungen:
- Power/ sovereignty rests with UK parliament at Westminster.
Power may be handed down to devolved bodies but
in theory it can be taken back by Westminster.
- Federal
Anmerkungen:
- Power/ sovereignty is spread out – the USA
States have their own constitution and laws.
The relationship between the federal government
& state is defined by the constitution
It can be a major issue because each state can differ
on laws on how peoples rights are protected.
- Human Rights
Anmerkungen:
- Protects us from all authorities becoming over mighty
On 2 October 2000, the HRA has made rights from the ECHR came enforceable in our own courts.