Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Edexcel, A2 Psychology,
Schizophrenia
- What is
it?
- Overview
- History
- First began to be
noticed in 1890's -
was thought to be
a type of mental
deterioration that
started in
adolescence
- Called schizophrenia in
1908, when it was found it
didn't necessarily have to
start in adolescence and
it wasn't necessarily the
start of mental
deterioration
- In men it often
begins in their
mid-20's; In
women it often
begins in their
early 30's
- Some schizophrenics can
recover completely, but
will always have to take
drugs to keep symptoms
under control and to
allow them to live
independently
- 15% will
need help
and support
for the rest
of their lives
- 15% will
not
respond to
treatment
- Affects
about 1%
of the
population
- Equally
common
between
men and
women
- Symptoms
- Psychotic disorders
are characterised by
major disturbances in
thought, emotion
and behaviour
- For a diagnosis of schizophrenia to be
given by a clinician, the patient must have
described 2 or more of the key symptoms
and for them to have been present for a
high proportion of the last month
- Positive
Symptoms
- Hallucinations
- patient
hears/sees
things
that don't
exist
- In the cases
of hearing
voices, most
are harsh
and critical
- Critical voices
provide a
running
commentary on
what the person
is doing
- Controlling
voices tell
the person
what to do
- Sometimes
the voices
talk to one
another
- Characteristics
that are
added to the
individual's
behaviour
- Delusions
- Patient thinks
their actions are
being controlled
by outside forces
- A common delusion
is the paranoid
delusion where the
person believes that
someone is trying to
mislead, manipulate
or kill them
- Delusions of
grandeur is when
the patient
believes they are in
a position of power
- Delusions can
lead to strange
behaviour e.g.
covering windows
in foil to keep
aliens out
- Thought insertion
(patient thinks
thoughts are put in
their head by
someone else)
- Thought
withdrawal (belief
that outside forces
are taking thoughts
from the mind)
- Thought
broadcasting
(belief that
thoughts are
being broadcast
to others
- Disordered
Thinking
- When someone
finds it hard to
put their
thoughts into
logical sense
- A patient's speech may
be very muddled or stop
mid-sentence (believe
the thought has been
taken out of their head)
- Patients may
also make up
words that have
no meaning
- Negative
Symptoms
- Poverty of
speech
- patient
uses as few
words as
possible
- Social
withdrawal
- patient no
longer
interacts
with friends
or family
- Flattening
effect
- lack of
expression in
their voice,
does not
show facial
emotions
- Characteristics
that are
missing in the
individual's
behaviour
- Explanations
- Biological
- Dopamine
Hypothesis
- Excess levels of
neurotransmitter,
dopamine, may
result in S/Z
- In a normal brain:
equal numbers of
receptor sites and
re-uptake channels
- Schizophrenic
brain: too many
receptors on the
post-synaptic
membrane
resulting in an
over-receptivity to
dopamine
- Evaluation
- Weaknesses
- Social and
environmental
factors can be
involved. Stressful life
events can trigger the
production of excess
dopamine
- Doesn't explain
whether it's
nurture or
nature
- Glutamate is also
thought to cause
psychotic
symptoms if its
production is
blocked
- PET scans show
that blocking
dopamine
receptors doesn't
always remove
symptoms
- Strengths
- Neuroleptic drugs that
block dopamine seem to
reduce the symptoms of
S/Z. E.g. phenothiazine
blocks dopamine at the
synapse, & typically
reduces many symptoms -
however does have more
effect on positive than
negative symptoms
- Randup & Mankvad
(1966) raised dopamine
levels of rats by
injecting them with
amphetamine. The rats
showed positive
symptoms of psychosis
- Rats= can't
generalise
to humans
- Outdated
- Limited/weak
research
- Lowers
validity
- The drug L-dopa
increases dopamine
levels, and can
produce many
symptoms of S/Z
- D2 Pathways
- overactivity
of the
mesolimbic
pathway=
positive
symptoms
- mesocortical
pathway
dysfunction
(extending from
hypothalamus to
frontal lobe) =
negative
symptoms
- Glutamate
Hypothesis
- Genetic
- Family, twin &
adoption studies
support the role
of genetic
influences in S/Z
- Immediate
biological relatives
of people with S/Z
have about 10
times greater risk
than that of the
general population
- Evaluation
- Strengths
- Gottesman & Shields
(1966) used a sample of 61
patients. They found on
average for MZ twins,
concordance rate was
42%. In DZ the average
was 17%. In severe cases
the average for MZ twins
rose to between 75-91%
- 42% is still low
- weak
research
- Tienari et al (2000)
found that almost
7% of adoptees with
S/Z had a biological
mother with the
same disorder
compared to only 2%
of schizophrenic
children born to
mothers without S/Z
- still low number
- Sullivan et al
(2003) conducted
a meta-analysis of
twin studies and
found a figure of
81% heritability
- high figure
- high reliability/validity
- meta-analysis increases
validity and eliminates
research problems
- Weaknesses
- Tiwari et al (2010)
points out that fewer
than 1/3 of people with
S/Z have a family
history of the disorder
- suggests an
environmental basis
- Twin and family
studies fail to control
for environmental
influences
- Generally have low
validity/reliability as
there's little control
- subjective
- Twin studies
involve comparing
MZ (share 100% of
genes) and DZ
(share 50% of
genes) twins to see
what differences
there are in the
incidence of a
certain
characteristic
- If S/Z is genetic then
we would expect
MZ to have a higher
concordance rate
than DZ
- Social
- Environmental/Social
Breeder Hypothesis
- A link between low
socio-economic
status and s/z
- Statistics show that the
majority of
schizophrenics in the UK
come from lower classes,
or from groups such as
immigrants.
- Research suggests that
social class is a cause
or involved in the
development of s/z
- Social drift = S/Z
makes you lower
class. Social breeder =
lower class increases
risk of S/Z
- Eaton et al. (1988) conducted
a meta-analysis of 17 studies
showing there are more
lower class people with s/z
and that the disorder is more
common in the lower class.
- Sufferers of a lower class
experience the illness and
treatment differently
- They are more likely to be
taken by the police or social
services for treatment than
those of upper classes
- Also more likely to
become mandatorily
committed or become
long-term sufferers.
- It's hard to separate those factors
which might be causing s/z with
those that are being caused by s/z,
it may be that lower social class,
economic status and the lack of a
job are all consequences of the
disorder, not the other way around.
- Cooper (2005) found that
the tendency for s/z
came from what happens
in early childhood rather
than developing because
of lower socioeconomic
status.
- Social Adversity
- S/z is more
common in urban
communities
rather than rural
areas
- Features in
environment:
- adversity in
adult life
- unemployment
and poverty
- social isolation
- poor housing
- Overcrowding
- high levels
of crime and
drug-use
- separation
from parents
as a child
- Harrison (2001)
suggests being
brought up in
declining
inner-city areas
could lead to s/z,
as this is where
the bulk of
sufferers lie
- Hjem et al. (2004) National
cohort study in Sweden, census
data from 1970 to 1990.
Childhood socioeconomic
indicators: rented apartments,
low socioeconomic status,
single-parent households,
unemployment and households
receiving welfare benefits.
- Those with 4 measures
of adversity had a 2.7
fold higher risk of s/z
than those with none.
- Social adversity leads
to the development
of s/z later in life
- Immigrant Populations
- UK census data shows higher
incidence of s/z in the
Afro-Caribbean and black immigrant
population (1991 & 2001).
- Estimate of 4X as many
incidences in these
populations as in the white
indigenous population
- Genetic reason for
this: the risk for s/z
is greater not only
for Afro-Caribbean
immigrants but also
for African-born
black immigrants
and to an extent
Asian immigrants.
- In Caribbean countries, the
incidence of s/z is similar to
that for the indigenous UK
population - lower than for
immigrants in the UK
- The rate for 2nd generation
Afro-Caribbean immigrants
is higher than for 1st
generation immigrants
- It is not thought that
those who came into
the UK as immigrants
in the 1950's and 60's
had weaker mental
health; it is thought
that immigrants
would have been
upwardly striving
individuals
- Afro-Caribbean people
with s/z are likely to be
unemployed, living in poor
inner-city areas and in a
worse situation than
other Afro-Caribbean
people. They're likely to be
living alone and to have
been separated from their
parents when younger
- Treatments
- Social
- In 1963, the
government ordered
many patients to be
released and treated
in their communities
- Outpatient
therapy in the
community
- Preventative
care: manage
their symptoms
through therapy
and medication
- Aftercare: meet
other people
suffering the
same disorder
- Emergency care:
number they
can phone
- Assertive
Community
Treatment
(ACT)
- Weaknesses
of ACT
- Gomory (2001) pointed out that
the client is offered little choice
and surrenders all responsibility
for making decisions and taking
care of themselves
- Lack of
right to
withdraw
- It's suggested
about 11% of
clients feel forced
into the treatment
- Harvey et al (2012) raised
questions about the difficulties for
staff of running the programme,
which should be considered when
looking at effectivness
- Adequate staffing is
needed to undertake
this hands-on therapy
(urban areas)
- may not be provided in
rural areas where there
aren't many cases of
S/Z due to cost
implications
- Inadequate treatment can be dangerous
if the patient is having suicidal thoughts
- Doesn't address
biological causes,
often combined with
chemotherapy
- Does not seem to have an actual
effect on functioning and reducing
positive and negative symptoms
- Strengths
of ACT
- Nishio et al. (2012) in Japan,
found some measures of
success in their study and
concluded that ACT could be
successful, although their
study focused on serious
mental illness, not just S/Z
- Van Vugt et al (2011) found, in the
Netherlands, that, provided the model
was adhered to, ACT could be
effective,and that it was the team
structure that was important
- Bond et al. (2001) summarised 25
controlled studies that looked at the
effectiveness of ACT. Concluded that
it was highly effective as it engaged
clients, prevented
re-hospitilisations, increased
housing stability and quality of life
- Addresses
social causes
- ACT is used in severe
mental health cases,
not only S/Z
- Bond (2002) points out that by
preventing hospitalisation the treatment
increases a client's choice, and by
helping them to live in the community,
the treatment increases their freedom.
- A review of evidence, found that ACT was
extremely effective in most mental health
disorders, across gender, age and culture,
and suggests it allows client choice
- Social skills and family training
can help someone to improve
their interactions with others
- How does
it work?
- real-life
settings
- visiting and helping
them, rather than
offering medication
- Enough staff to
offer this support
- Help with independence,
rehabilitation and recovery,
and to avoid homelessness
and re-hospitilisation
- Work with other professionals
such as psychiatrists, nurses,
social workers and people with
whom the treatment has
worked
- A commitment to
spend as much time as
necessary to support
them. offering a
holistic treatment
- Psychological
- Biological
- Chemotherapy
- Weaknesses of
Chemotherapy
- Drugs have been
described as a
chemical straight
jacket and some
people think that such
control by society is
unacceptable
- Generally more effect on
positive symptoms than
negative ones because
anti-psychotics block
dopamine receptors
- Side effects
- Guo et al. (2011) found few
differences when they
compared 7 anti-psychotic
drugs,in particular when
they measured
discontinuation over a year
- Hartling et al (2012)
looked at many
studies and found
that for core
symptoms there
were generally few
differences
- It doesn't
address social
causes such as
social
adversity etc.
- Can result in revolving
door syndrome in which
the patient keeps getting
readmitted into hospital
- Strengths of
Chemotherapy
- Effective for
treating Anorexia
Nervosa aswell
- Meltzer et al. (2004)
found that
haloperidol
(anti-psychotic) gave
significant
improvements in all
areas of functioning
compared with a
placebo, which is a
starting point for
saying that
anti-psychotics work
- For a disorder that
has more biological
causes, this
biological treatment
is likely to be more
effective
- Anti-psychotic Drugs
- Works to affect levels
of neurotransmitters
- Phenothiazines
- Decreases
dopamine
activity,
- Reduces
positive
symptoms
- No effect on
negative
symptoms
- Side effects
- dizziness
- nausea
- sexual
impotence
- tardive
dyskinesia
- involuntary
facial
movements
- Clozapine
- Blocks less
dopamine
activity and
blocks more
serotonin
- Reduces
both positive
and negative
symptoms
- Can produce a
potentially lethal
blood disorder by
lowering the white
blood cell count
- Physical
therapy
- May have
placebo effect
(psychological)
- Carlsson et al. (1999/2000) Network
interactions in schizophrenia - therapeutic
implications (contemporary study)
- A review
- Research focuses on other
studies and forms conclusions by
looking at a broad set of results.
- Background
- Research has shown how there is a
dopaminergic dysfunction in S/Z
(the dopamine hypothesis). In PET
scans, an increase in dopamine
correlates with positive symptoms
- More recently there is
evidence to suggest that
dopamine interacts with
other neurotransmitters.
Glutamate is one of these.
- Glutamate: the most common
neurotransmitter accounting
for 90% of synaptic
connections. It's involved in
learning and memory. It
regulates development and
creation of nerve contacts.
Glutamate bonds to NMDA
receptors.
- Dopamine: controls the
brains reward and pleasure
centres. It is responsible for
feelings of pleasure,
addiction, movement and
motivation. People repeat
behaviours that lead to
dopamine production.
- Serotonin and
Glutamate are linked
in perception and a
lack of them can
result in paranoia,
insensibility, anxiety
- The Glutamate
Hypothesis
- Glutamate deficiency/
defect could be linked to S/Z
- When people take the drug
PCP, it produces
schizophrenic-like symptoms
- PCP blocks
glutamate
receptors
- People with S/Z must
either have a defect in
the receptor so it can't
be properly stimulated
by glutamate or they
have a deficiency of
glutamate.
- NMDA receptor
antagonists such as
the drug PCP, block
NMDA receptors.
- This means glutamate can no
longer bind to these receptors
which means less or no electrical
impulses can be initiated
- Glutamate and GABA are
long-distance
neurotransmitters which
act on the whole cortex and
down into the spinal cord
- The genes
that relate
to S/Z seem
to impact
on the
function of
glutamate/
cause
glutamate
dysfunction.
- Aim: to better
understand the
relationship between
neurotransmitter
functioning and
psychosis in S/Z and
to produce drugs that
are more effective.
- Method: A review
doesn't have a
procedure or ppts as the
data isn't gathered
directly. The method is
to review the methods
and findings of other
studies in this area.
They then used this to
build a body of
knowledge about S/Z.
- Findings:
- PCP
- Acts as an
antagonist of a
glutamate
receptor
- Glutamate deficiency more
likely to be result in psychosis
(Moghaddam & Adams 98) -
shown in PET scans
- Glutamate
failure (PET)
- in the cerebral
cortex may lead to
negative symptoms
- in the basal
ganglia may
lead to positive
symptoms
- Weaknesses
of PET scans
- May be unreliable
as areas of activity
in the brain are
often delocalised
so can be difficult
to pinpoint the
activity
- Small
sample sizes
as it's so
expensive
- Panicking in PET
scanner may cause
different brain activity
results (stressful and
anxiety-provoking)
- Type I error
- Strengths of
PET scans
- Scientific,
objective
evidence
- High internal
validity and
reliability
- Provides
evidence for
positive and
negative
symptoms
- Less
reductionist
- Clozapine is
a highly
effective
drug for S/Z
- fewer
reported
side
effects
- reduces
levels of
dopamine
and
serotonin
- serotonin is
related to
glutamate
- Weaknesses of
Secondary Data
- Often meant for
other purposes and
hypotheses so not
always suited to
this explanation
for S/Z
- Low
validity
- Clozapine
research -
don't know
how controlled
the studies
were etc.
- Biased in which
studies were
included in the
review (may have
chosen studies
that fit hypothesis
- Strengths of
Secondary data
- Easier and
quicker to
collect
- Gather lots of
data efficiently
- Assess reliability
and validity across
a whole number
of studies and
group them
together
- Large
sample size
- Increased
population
vailidity
- more effective in
patients who have
not previously
responded to
treatment
- Animal
Studies
- Research done on mice in
early 2009 has shown that
administering NMDA
antagonists in late/post
foetal stage increases
neuronal death which is
linked to adult S/Z like
behaviour
- This led to symptoms
(such as disturbed
social function, inability
to adapt to predictable
future stressors) that
overlap with S/Z
- Strengths
of Animal
Research
- Able to do things
that would be
unethical to do
with humans
- Able to test
where you
otherwise
wouldn't
- Wider range of
data available -
can gather
more data on
effects of
glutamate
- Weaknesses
of Animal
Research
- May be unable
to generalise
to humans
- Rats
symptoms
of psychosis
are different
to humans
- Lacks reliability
- Often
unethical
- Conclusion
- Further research is
needed in developing
drugs to treat S/Zto
avoid negative side
effects
- Drug therapies need to
consider the role of other
neurotransmitters. Different
types of S/Z could be due to
abnormal levels of different
neurotransmitters not just
dopamine