Zusammenfassung der Ressource
NEW LABOUR
- REDUCING INEQUALITY
- EAZ: raise
motivation/achievement in low
income, deprived areas - Ofsted
praised things like breakfast and
HW club
- EiC: replaced EAZs, had
similar aim. Special
programs like gifted, city
learning centres, mentors,
cheap comp lease. More
effective than EAZs
- SURE START: under 4 and families in
deprived areas. Improving health,
education and employment. Based on
early intervention.
- (-) Difficult to evaluate - every
program is different and only ST
results available. Disappointing results
after 3 years.
- EMA: attempted to reduce class gap in
education - weekly cash allowance
payable to low income 16-19 year olds.
- (-) Class gap widened in
HE. MC: 79% WC: 16%
(2001) (MC:55% WC: 6% -
1991)
- (-) contradictory as they introduced tuition fees
which reduced WC in HE. (Whitty)
- Policies like 'Girls into Science
and Technology to reduce
gender inequality
- assimilation: ethnic groups
to assimilate into British
culture. (-) real problem is
poverty and racism.
- MCE: valuing all
cultures in school -
raise minority pupils
self-esteem
- misguided; black pupils
not failing due to low
self-esteem
- tokenism; fails to tackle
institutional racism
- PROMOTING DIVERSITY
- Specialist schools; rejected osfa view.
Spec in particular subject area. - increase
comp and raise standards
- (-) not clear why standards have risen - Ofsted
reports found schools often do better outside spec
subject
- higher intake of MC
students. Low income
schools difficulty
raising funds
- schools can be selective (high
in demand) choose more able
students. (MC)
- Academies: plans to turn 200 failing
comprehensive schools into A's to improve
standards. Mixed results - some improved,
some didn't.
- ASSESSMENT + TARGETS
- Pupils, teachers and schools
assessed with key stage tests (GCSE,
AL, Ofsted)
- assessments published
and schools ranked in
league tables
- key targets set to raise standards,
encourage competition and measure
performance
- SCHOOL LEAGUE TABLES
- Only based on exam results until recently
- value added - difference
school made from 11-16
- most improved -
GCSE results over
time
- (-) fail to provide accurate measure of school
performance. GCSE may say more about
social bg + VA doesn't take class into
account.
- 2006- social factors included - what
pupils expected to achieve. Schools
whose pupils exceed this do well in LT
- Grace: low income schools do better here
than exam results/ VA measure
- exam results remain basis for
parents decision - encourages
recruitment of MC over special
needs/excluded as well as
teacing to the test, not
understanding and learning.
- VOCATIONAL EDUC + TRAINING
- Main role of educ to
provide
skills+knowledge
required for work force
- Tomlinson: education
system must respond to
competitive global
economy by improving
skills/quals
- Labour seen all education as vocational.
- CRITICISMS
- Tomlinson: they narrowed education to an economic function
- obsessed with raising standards so UK can compete in
global market
- preoccupation with comp,
choice + standards puts
schools under pressure to
stay at the top soselect
more able pupils.
- knowledge+understanding not
priority - exam tech and rote
learning/revision more imp
- McKnight, Glennerster and Lupton;
standards appear to have risen but
gap between classes remains as
wide as 1989
- Trowler; as long as
social inequality
exists in wider
society it'll be
reflected in educ
- private/fee paying schools still exist despite labour opposing them
- NEW DEAL
- aim; reduce youth
unemployment (18-24)
- personal adviser to guide them through;
training/full time educ, work for 6 months,
subsidized job = loss of benefits if they
didn't participate
- (-) 40% failed to find lasting
jobs
- (-) critics; reduction due to
economic improvement
- Labour = great success
- VOCATIONAL QUALS
- Aimed to raise skill
level; 2/3 employers see
little value in these.
- GNVOQs; alts to
GCSE+AL.
rebranded as
vocational ALs
so could be seen
as equivilent
- (-) cosmetic
exercise =
route to low
paid/status
jobs