Zusammenfassung der Ressource
The Problem of Evil
- Overview
- The problem of evil is the question of how to
reconcile the existence of evil with a God that is
omniscient, omnipotent and omnibenevolent
- Evil is whatever is painful, malicious of disastrous
- Moral Evil
- The existence of suffering due to
human activity alone
- murder
- holocaust
- rape
- Natural Evil
- Events in the world which bring about
suffering due to natural disasters
- earthquakes
- Floods
- landslide
- What is the classic theistic God like?
- The Inconsistent Triad
- God needs to be all 3 omnis or else
it creates an inconsistent triad
- How can pain and suffering
exist if God is all 3 omnis?
- If God is omnipotent
- He would've been able to
create a world without suffering
- If God is omniscient
- He would've know that the suffering and
evil would occur and put a stop to it
- If God is omnibenevolent
- He would not tolerate evil and
suffering in the world
- Philosophical Explanations
- The Free will Defence
- Summarised
- Evils are entirely due to the bad, free
choices made by human beings
- It was good of God to create free beings,
but bad of them to abuse this freedom
- God is not responsible for the
evils of the world, humans are
- Key Features
- God Created a perfect world
- Humans were created perfect
and in the image of God
- Humans given free will
- God told them not to eat from
tree of knowledge
- Humans were tempted by serpent to disobey God
- They eat the forbidden fruit
- God punishes serpent, the women and the ground
- Adam and eve cast out, changes God's
relationships with humans forever
- Strengths
- Allows the existence of
classic theistic God
- Faithful to Bible narrative
- Evil not part of God's original plan
- God is not responsible for mans evil choices
- Weaknesses
- Requires taking Genesis
literally - unscientific and
disproven by Evolution
- How could evil come about in the perfect world?
- If there was a possibility for evil then
surely the world was not created perfect
- Why did God not create humans who
always choose morally right actions
- Why did God not prevent fall of man if he foresaw it
- Philosophical attempts to solve the
problem of evil are known as theodicy
- Augustine's Theodicy
- Soul deciding
- Concerned with judgement of human souls
- The classic biblical answer to Evil
- Starts from the idea that the world
was created wholly good
- "God saw everything that he had made,
and indeed, it was very good" Genesis
- World is a perfect place
- Humans created physically and
morally good, but not perfect
- No natural evil, everything
vegetarian and lives in harmony
- Evil
- Is the result of man's misuse of freewill
resulting from eating the forbidden fruit
- Misuse of freewill caused the downfall from perfection
- Moral Evil - comes as a result
of misuse of freewill
- Natural Evil- comes as a result of this misuse,it is the
corruption of the order and harmony within nature
- Is Privatio Boni (Privation of Good)
- Believed that Evil is an absence of
good, not a force in itself
- Rejects cosmic dualism, not two
opposite forces in the world
- Natural Evil is a loss of order following the
expulsion from Eden (Evil is nature corrupted)
- Natural and Moral Evil can be
seen as a punishment from God
- For Augustine, this is justification for the fact
that God does not put an end to suffering
- Strengths
- Privation of Good
- Supported by
many modern
philosophers
- Allows God to stay
omnibenevolent
- Evil as a result of human abuse of free will
- Supported by many modern thinkers
- Seems clear that much of evil and
suffering in world is caused by
humans choosing to act in wrong
ways
- Backed up by biblical evidence
- Considered strength by Christians
- Weaknesses
- Logical errors
- 'perfect world gone wrong'
- Moral errors
- Would omnibenevolent God punish
people for Eve's sin?
- Scientific errors
- Challenged by evolutionary
theory
- Irenaeus' Theodicy
- Soul Making
- concerned with development of human souls
- Modern comparison "No pain, no gain"
- traced evil back to free will
- Said that people need to suffer
- and that people need to be made to choose between
Good and Evil otherwise they'd be like obedient robots
- God Wants people to choose to worship him
- Taught key 3 ideas
- God did not make a perfect world
- God is partly responsible for evil
- God created humans imperfectly and
made it their task to develop perfection
- His aim when he created the world was to
make humans flawless, in his likeness.
- Evil has a valuable role to play in
God's plans for humans
- Achieving likeness of God requires
willing cooperation of humans
- Genuine perfection can't just be given by God -
must be developed by humans themselves
- This requires free will - humans
must choose to be willing
- God's plans required the genuine possibility
that human actions might have produced evil
- The potential for evil was essential to God's plan for
transforming humans into God's likeness
- Hick's version
- Humans
- Being created in God's image is
about evolution of humans into
rational, intelligent and religious
animals
- Humans gain God's likeness when they
grow into a relationship with him
- The Fall
- Used to describe the distance
between God and humans
- Epistemic Distance
- God's presence is not obvious in our world
- Therefore humans have a choice
whether to believe in God or not
- Soul Making
- We live in a world where we
make free decisions
- Right choices enable us to develop
good habits and virtuous qualities
- Natural Disasters
- The world has to have danger
in order for us to develop into
the Image of God
- The Afterlife
- Believes you can
develop God's likeness in
our world - helps you to get into heaven
- Different to Iranaeus Ideas
- Strengths
- can be
reconciled with
evolution
- No logical errors
- Helps to explain existence of
moral/natural evil
- Weaknesses
- Quantity of suffering
- Soul-making requires some suffering
- But why is there so much suffering?
- Many would argue that the
quantity of suffering in our
world is unacceptable
- Suffering cannot be seen
as an act of love
- God who is omnibenelovent would
not allow suffering