Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Social Psychology - Social Influence
- Conformity
- The tendency to change what we do,
think and say in response to the
influence of others or social pressure
- Compliance
- The most superficial type
- Person conforms publicly
- Continue to privately disagree
- E.g. - laughing at a joke while
privately not finding it funny
- Internalisation
- The deepest type of conformity
- Taking on the view of a group at a deep
and permanent level - Conversion
- E.g. - A student who becomes a vegetarian whilst
sharing a flat with animal rights activists at university
- They may retain these views and continue
to be a vegetarian for the rest of their life
- Research into Conformity
- Asch (1951)
- Unambiguous task
- Participants shown a series of lines
Anlagen:
- Had to compare the line on the left with the lines on
the right and state which ones matched (A, B, C, or D)
- 123 Participants
- All but one of the participants were "confederates"
- Instructed the confederates to give the same
incorrect answer on 12 of the 18 trials
- "Critical Trials"
- The true participant was always the
last or penultimate one to answer
- Found a mean conformity rate of 37%
- I.e - Participants agreed with the incorrect majority
answer on just over one third of the critical trials.
- Very high considering the unambiguous and easy nature of the task.
- Within the 37%, there were wide individual differences as 5% conformed on every critical trial yet 25%
remained completely independent, going against the majority and giving the correct answer on all 12 trials
- Asch's research suggests that people tend to conform to a
majority group so that they don't stand out from the crowd
- Evaluation of Asch's Research
- - Low Temporal Validity
- McCarthyism
- During this era (1950s), thousands of Americans were accused of being Communists or
communist sympathisers and became the subject of questioning before the government
- This would have made people a lot more
reluctant to stand out from the crowd
- - Population Validity
- The participants in this study were all American male students
- Androcentric study
- As this is only a small percentage of the people
in America, the results from the study cannot be
generalised to a wider population that includes females
- Low ecological validity
- - Ethics
- Deception
- The participants were not informed about what the
experiement would test them on whether they conform or not
- Justified as experiment would not work otherwise
- + Lab Experiment
- Easy to repeat (Test - Retest)
- More reliability
- - Perrin & Spencer
- Replicated Asch's study
- In their initial study, they obtained only
one conforming result out of 396 trials
- Used a group of science and engineering students
- In a subesquent study, they found similar
levels of conformity to the original Asch study
- Used youths on probation
- Showed that the "Asch effect" is not a stable phenomenon
- Smith & Bond
- Meta-analysis of conformity studies
- Using the Asch paradigm
- Found that there has been a steady decline
in conformity since the original Asch study
- Independent cultures tended to show lower
conformity rates than collectivist cultures
- The more ambiguous the task, the higher
the levels of conformity rates in all cultures
- Explanations of why
people Conform
- Normative Social Influence
- Based on the desire to be liked
- Involves public compliance
- Individual does not privately comply or change their views
- Informational Social Influence
- Based on the desire to be right
- Involves an individual pubicly and privately changing their views
- More permanent