Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Methods in
Psychology
- Probability
(5% level)
- Type I Error
- If HE is accepted
and later turns out
not to be true
- More likely if a
lenient probability is
used e.g. 10% level.
- Type II Error
- If HE is rejected and it
later turns out to be true
- More likely if a
strict probability is
used e.g. 1%
- Parametric and
Non-Parametric Tests
- Non-Parametric
- Use nominal + ordinal data,
simple, often subjective
scales, tests for
significance, convert scores
to ranks
- sign test,
Wilcoxon test,
Mann-Whitney,
chi-squared +
Spearman's
Rank Order
Correlation test
- Parametric
- Use interval/ratio data,
contains info. about size of
difference between scores,
more powerful test of
significance
- Related t-test,
independent t-test,
Pearson's Product
Moment
Correlation test
- Correlations
- Test for a link/ association
between 2 key variables
- Research Hypothesis (instead of HE) used
to predict relationship e.g. 'there will be a
significant correlation between variable A
and variable B'
- Positive Correlation
- Variable A
increases as
variable B increases
- Negative
Correlation
- Variable A increases
as variable B decreases
- Zero Correlation
- No pattern/ relationship
- Directional Hypotheses
& Tails of Test
- Non-directional
Hypotheses
- There will be a
significant difference in
the DV when IV is
changed
- Used by researchers to
reduce experimenter bias
(e.g. when rejecting
anomalies
- 2-tailed statistical
test
- Directional Hypotheses
- Predict a significant
increase or significant
decrease in DV when IV
is changed
- Only used when there is
strong previous evidence
about the direction of the
results
- 1-tailed Statistical
test
- Reliability
- External Reliability (test
re-test)
- How consistent a
method measures
over time when
repeated (same
people under same
conditions e.g. IQ test
- Correlate the results of a test
conducted on one occaision with the
results of a test conducted on a later
occaision (with same subjects). High
positive correlation = reliable method
- Inter rater/ Observer Reliability
- content
analysis/
observational
studies
- 1.) Clearly describe behaviour
to record (categorise)
- 2.) Observe same
ppts. for same amount
of time, independently
- 3.) Compare
results, if 90%
similar = reliable,
consistent
method
- Validity
- To what extent have you
measured the factor you
set out to measure;
whether other factors have
affected your results
- e.g. Bigelow set out to measure children's
understanding of friendship, but instead
may have measured their language ability
- Methods of
establishing Validity::
- 1.) Face Validity: look
at the method to see if
it appears to measure
what it is supposed to
measure; open to bias
- 2.) Concurrent Validity: give same ppts. the new
test, and an established test which measures the
same thing (or questionnaire). Test scores for
correlation - significant positive = valid
- 3.) Ecological Validity:where
the conditions of a test are so
controlled that they do not
represent how a situation
would occur naturally
- Sampling
- Target Population =
people that your
hypothesis relates
to and from whom
the sample is taken
- Generalise = predict
future behaviour of
TP on basis of the
result of sample
- Q-Sort Cards: used to measure
self esteem, select 4 cards,
convert into score of mood
- Reliability: test re-test = do test
again on same ppts. after two
weeks, same results = reliable
- Validity: Compare result's
correlation with an established
study (questionnaire), significant
+ve correlation = valid
- Random/ Systematic Sample:
everyone in TP has an equal chance
of being selected, assigned numbers
- Opportunity Sample: people who
are willing and convenient, likely to
be unrepresentative
- Stratified Sample: Divided into groups (e.g.
gender, nationality, age) then random
representative sample from each group
- Ethical Guidelines
- Informed Consent
- Verbal or written consent
after information about task
is explained, no deception
- Consent for studies
involving children
- Consent from parents (if
under 16) and child
wherever possible
- Right of Withdrawal
- Informed of right to
leave study at any
time in brief,
informed of right to
withdraw information
in debrief
- Deceiving Participant
- Explained in debrief,
consent to be
deceived, knowing aim
may affect behaviour
- Protection from Physical
and Psychological Harm
- Must be aware of consequences of
investigation, should feel no worse about
themselves after investigation, normalise by
informing of other ppts., counselling
- Hypotheses
- Experimental (HE)
- Null
(Ho)
- Alternative (H1)
- Research (HR)
- Descriptive Statistics
- Averages
- summarise set of
data into 1 value
- Compare 2 sets of scores
- Central point of
2 sets of scores
- Mean: interval/ratio data
- Median: Ordinal data
- Mode:
Nominal data
- Measures of Dispersal
- How spread out a set of scores are
- Tells yous if your
ppts. scores are
consistent or variable
- Range: largest - smallest value,
affected by extreme scores
- Standard Deviation: uses all
scores, use for interval/ ratio
data, measures the deviation
of each score from the mean
- Quantitative
& Qualitative
Methods
- Quantitative
- +Controls extraneous
variables, +Establish
C&E. +Can test
hypothesis, +Can carry
out statistical tests
- Qualitative
- +Generates new theories, +High face validity, +High ecological
validity, +High level of detail; understand behaviour better