Zusammenfassung der Ressource
Evaluation Issues
- Ethics
- situation could have induced stress in the
participants as any test conditions can this would
break the ethical guideline or protection
- ethical = YES
- DC COWPAD
- however breaks routine/ stressed/
autistics struggle with eye contact
- EV
- took place in a lab =
highly controlled
- unnatural surrounding
for the participants
- unrepresentative data
- means that the results are
ungeneraliseable to most people
- used pictures of real eyes
- mostly look at the eyes
- realistic
- Data
- QUANTITATIVE data was collected
- scores of each subject on
each of the test administered
- eyes task measured
whether the subjects had
TOM, they saw no need
for qualitative data to be
collected
- Reliability
- easy to replicate
- concurrent validity was checked
- checked validity
by doing the
control tasks
- low EV= not realistic
when judging emotions
- Validity
- easy to replicate
- highly controlled because
it is an experiment
- always stayed in the same location
- Sample
- the sample was small = unrepresentative
- 16 Autistics
- 50 Non-Autistics
- 10 Tourettes
- Usefulness
- most people on the autistic spectrum lack TOM and
thus knowledge can inform various techniques for
people educating and interacting with autistic people
- help them - teach them to use eye contact
- SNAPSHOT study