Zusammenfassung der Ressource
The consolidation of
Sino-Soviet friendship 1950-54
- The origins of the Korean War
- Korean War was first test of the new alliance
- Military campaign against South Korea was agreed between
Stalin and the North's communist leader Kim Il-Sung
- Negotiations kept secret from Mao
- Stalin's priorities in the run up
to the Korean War
- Soviet troops mustn't meet US troops in battle - if they do it would
risk nuclear attack - China must do most of the fighting
- USSR do not want to be forced to fight in Korea
under the terms of the Treaty of Friendship
- USSR will not give military aid to China - too expensive
- Must consolidate comm control in Korea - if not, US will take
control of North Korea and attack Russia across the border
- In essence - Stalin wanted to expand comm influence to
South-East Asia without involving Russia in the war
- Therefore he needed Mao to fight with minimalist
Russian aid, he achieved this in the following ways:
- Persuaded Kim Il-Sung to attack South Korea
- promising Soviet backing
- Following entry of UN troops, Mao feared North K would
be defeated - leading to capitalist invasion of China
- Forced Mao to enter war - Mao anticipated Soviet
help under the terms of the Treaty of Friendship
- Stalin refused to help - as China was fighting US forces - UN
was not a capitalist nation - so terms of treaty did not apply
- The Korean War 1950-1953
- China's entry into Korean War was hugely significant
- UN troops were held off, and after 3 years of fighting - war
ended with reassertion of the division of Korea
- Partial success for USSR - comm regime in North
Korea had been consolidated - but they had failed
to expand their influence in South-East Asia
- Significance of the War for
Sino-Soviet relations
- Although Stalin manipulated Mao into entering war - the
conflict consolidated the Sino-Soviet friendship
- Huge cost of war increased China's dependence on the USSR
- USSR refused to join the war as China's ally but agreed to
sell China advanced military hardware
- Post-Korean War China turned to USSR for aid - to help
rebuild their shattered economy
- For Russia - war had proved China's
worth as an ally
- Stalin acknowledged that China played crucial role in
acting as a buffer between UN troops and Soviet border
- Following the War - there were 2 further Sino-Soviet
agreements, in the 1953 and 1954 deals, the USSR
agreed to:
- A significant package of aid for China's first 5 year plan -
including a bigger loan than had been agreed in 1950
- Help China build power plants
- Hand over the Lushan Naval base to China -
located on the border between the countries
- Increase trade with China
- Significance of the war for the USA
- USA concerned by Korean war
- Demonstrated potential power of an alliance
between USSR and China
- China's willingness to fight alongside other comm nations also made any
kind of alliance with the USA impossible
- Confrontation over Taiwan
- After comm victory in Chinese civil war -
Nationalists set up their own govt in Taiwan, which
was extremely important to Mao for 2 reasons
- He was concerned that Taiwan could be used as a US
base in a future war between China and the US
- Mao wanted to unite China under
communist leadership
- As a result - Mao launched 2 unsuccessful
attempts to take over Taiwan by force
- The first 1954-55 was significant because of the
response from the superpowers
- The USA
- Congress moved quickly to defend Taiwan
- September 54 - US military leaders advised
Eisenhower to use nukes to defend Taiwan
- Eisenhower refused - but in Dec 1954, US and Taiwan signed a
Mutual Defence Treaty, guaranteeing Taiwan's independence
- US response demonstrated ongoing hostility between US and China
- The USSR
- Khrushchev publicly agreed to retaliate against US if China
was invaded or bombed by US forces
- In private - made clear that he didn't want to be involved
- Soviet response was significant as it showed that the USSR
was unwilling to help China achieve its military goals
- Also indicated that Khrushchev was worried that Mao's
ill-judged foreign policy would lead to nuclear war