State of art materials development article test

Frage 1 von 10

1

According to Tomilson and Masuhara (2007) what is the develop criteria for evaluating and selecting materials question model?

Wähle eine der folgenden:

a) Are the various stages in a teaching unit (what you would probably call presentation,
practice and production) adequately developed?
b)Is dogmatic ininsisting on the use of a Presentation Practice Production (PPP) approach
a)Does the writer use current everyday language, and sentence structures that follow normal
word order?
d) To what extent is the level of abstractness appropriate?
a) Is each question an evaluation question?
b) Does each question only ask one question?
c) Is each question answerable?
d) Is each question free of dogma?
e) Is each question reliable in the sense that other evaluators would interpret it in the same
way?
a)Are there any materials for testing?’
b)Are the learning activities in the course
c) Material likely to appeal to the learners?

Erklärung

Frage 2 von 10

1

Which ones are the categories proposed by Rubby (2003) about dynamic model of material evaluation?

Wähle eine oder mehr der folgenden:

Psychological validity, pedagogical validity , process and content validity.
Teaching/learning situation, a neutral analysis, and a belief-driven evaluation .
Teaching/learning situation,psychological validity and neutral analysis.
A belief-driven evaluation, selection, and pedagogical validity

Erklärung

Frage 3 von 10

1

McGrath (2002) proposes ‘four evaluative adapting material processes´ They are :
1.Teachers may select the material
2. They have to reject either completely or partially sections
3. Add extensions or further exploitation of the existing materials
4.It should be learner centered.

Wähle eins der folgenden:

WAHR
FALSCH

Erklärung

Frage 4 von 10

1

Saraceni (2003), advocates that, in order to involve
learners in the process, materials should actually be written with learner
adaptation in mind, aiming to be learner-centred, flexible, open-ended, relevant, universal
and authentic, and giving choices to learners. She also stresses that offering provocative topics
and aesthetic experience can facilitate learner adaptation.

Wähle eins der folgenden:

WAHR
FALSCH

Erklärung

Frage 5 von 10

1

Which one of the option below is not a model of potential benefits in electronic materials?

Wähle eine der folgenden:

Facilitating reading by making hidden information available, by providing on-the-spot help,
by supporting comprehension with graphics, video and sound, and facilitating writing
through modelling the genre, demonstrating the process, facilitating brainstorming and
research, helping to draft and providing the potential for conferencing, editing and revision
(Derewianka 2003a
When thinking or writing about electronic materials it helps to distinguish between CALL
materials, web sources of language experience, and ICT applications which can be made use of both to deliver materials and to facilitate interaction
Organisational advantages such as easy access, convenient storage and retrieval, easy
sharing and recycling and cost efficiency; pedagogical advantages such as authenticity,
interaction and situated learning; learner advantages such as instant feedback, choice of
route and sequence, monitoring of progress, control and empowerment (Reinders & White
2010)
Localised adaptation of materials; free source of a variety of authentic texts; out-of-class
opportunities for spoken interaction between learners; development of digital literacy
through comparing and evaluating sources of similar information; choice of routes and
activities when using teacher blog materials (Motteram 2011)

Erklärung

Frage 6 von 10

1

What CALL stands for?

Wähle eine oder mehr der folgenden:

A really important phone call.
Computer Assisted Language Learning.
Cherries, apples, lemons and lamb.
Coursebooks aimed to language learning.

Erklärung

Frage 7 von 10

1

Fülle die Lücken, um den Text zu vervollständigen.

´´When thinking or writing about electronic materials it helps to distinguish between CALL
materials i.e. ELT materials available from , computer software, courseware and , web sources of language experience e.g. and ICT
applications which can be made use of both to deliver materials and to facilitate interaction e.g. .´´

Erklärung

Frage 8 von 10

1

Wähle von der Dropdown-Liste, um den Text zu vervollständigen.

Regarding pedagogic approaches used through the years for material development, the reading argues that:
“In the sixties and early seventies they stressed they were teaching the language directly, without the use of ( translation, coursebooks ) or ( dictionaries, explanation ): in the seventies they boasted that they were following a ( communicative approach, PPP (Presentation,Practice,Production) ) which featured either the learning of functions or notions, or both. Subsequently, they have claimed to be following natural approaches based on topics, themes or tasks and many coursebooks nowadays stress that their syllabus is based on the ‘can do’ statements of the Common European Framework…´´

Erklärung

Frage 9 von 10

1

Wähle von der Dropdown-Liste, um den Text zu vervollständigen.

According to Tomilson and its opinion about the need of published material, he sets:
..."My position is that most teachers and students welcome published materials and can
gain from them. However, if a teacher has ( confidence, principled creativity, Money and budget ) and the respect
of their learners, then a textbook-free course can actually be more facilitative in providing
the ( contextualization, and exposure, personalised, relevant and engaging ) experience of language in use and opportunities
for observing how the language is used and for meaningful ( communication, teaching and learning process ), which many
textbook authors find it difficult to provide."

Erklärung

Frage 10 von 10

1

Amrani 2011 reports:
I would like to see more ❌ textbooks and more ❌ which are designed to be ❌ and to
offer teachers and students opportunities for localisation, personalisation and choice. In
addition, publishers could produce web-based global ‘coursebooks’ which offer opportunities
for ❌, ❌ and replacement and which facilitate ‘an ongoing process where
materials are refined and even changed throughout the life of a product’

Wählen Sie unten die Option aus, um den hervorgehobenen Text zu vervollständigen

localised

contextualized

international books

global textbooks

flexible

academic

choice

travelling

modification

translation

	Erstellt von Daniela Gutierrez vor etwa 9 Jahre

The test is composed by a set of ten different styles questions regarding the reading of "State of art materials development article" by Brian Tomilson.

State of art materials development article test

Frage 1 von 10

According to Tomilson and Masuhara (2007) what is the develop criteria for evaluating and selecting materials question model?

Wähle eine der folgenden:

Erklärung

Frage 2 von 10

Which ones are the categories proposed by Rubby (2003) about dynamic model of material evaluation?

Wähle eine oder mehr der folgenden:

Erklärung

Frage 3 von 10

McGrath (2002) proposes ‘four evaluative adapting material processes´ They are : 1.Teachers may select the material 2. They have to reject either completely or partially sections 3. Add extensions or further exploitation of the existing materials 4.It should be learner centered.

Wähle eins der folgenden:

Erklärung

Frage 4 von 10

Wähle eins der folgenden:

Erklärung

Frage 5 von 10

Which one of the option below is not a model of potential benefits in electronic materials?

Wähle eine der folgenden:

Erklärung

Frage 6 von 10

What CALL stands for?

Wähle eine oder mehr der folgenden:

Erklärung

Frage 7 von 10

Fülle die Lücken, um den Text zu vervollständigen.

Erklärung

Frage 8 von 10

Wähle von der Dropdown-Liste, um den Text zu vervollständigen.

Erklärung

Frage 9 von 10

Wähle von der Dropdown-Liste, um den Text zu vervollständigen.

Erklärung

Frage 10 von 10

Wählen Sie unten die Option aus, um den hervorgehobenen Text zu vervollständigen

Erklärung

McGrath (2002) proposes ‘four evaluative adapting material processes´ They are :
1.Teachers may select the material
2. They have to reject either completely or partially sections
3. Add extensions or further exploitation of the existing materials
4.It should be learner centered.