Name the QUEENS BENCH case which is a further authority in addition to Pearson v Rose & Young on consent + larcenry/trick

Which QUEENS BENCH 1985 decision states that B1 must have actual poss under s.9 OR that S can deliver goods to B2 direct?

What does s.47(2)(a) state?

Which 1960 QUEENS BENCH case evidences the effect of s.47(2)(a)?

What was the questionable feature of the QB decision in Mount v J & J?

Which HOUSE OF LORDS case asserted that an innocent buyer will not receive good title if the owner had the goods stolen from him?

Which HOUSE OF LORDS case asserted that an innocent buyer will not receive good title if the owner had the goods stolen from him?

Which SCOTTISH case suggests that a disposition for the purposes of s.9 may include contracting to install /incorporate goods into a building (although not a sale)?

Which QUEENS BENCH case notes that any 'delivery of transfer' for the purposes of s.9 needs to be voluntary?

Which judge in which 1965 COURT OF APPEAL case criticised the requirement of 'acting as an MA' under s.9?

Which sections of SOGA 1979 also constitute a real remedy for a seller?

Which section of SOGA dictates that a seller will loose his lien when B1 lawfull obtains poss of the goods?

Whose name must be on the HP Agreement for the purposes of section 111 of the 1964 Act?

Which COURT OF APPEAL decision sets out exactly who can be a private purchaser for the purposes of part III of the HP Act 1964?

Which COURT OF APPEAL decision sets out exactly who can be a private purchaser for the purposes of part III of the HP Act 1964?

Where does 'from a person in possession under a HP' NOT apply?

What is a 'disposition' for the purposes of Part III of the HP Act 1964?

Why does Iwan Davis feel that wrongful dispositions under HP agreements are too safe for imprudent buyers?

What is the classic 2010 COURT OF APPEAL case dealing with a disposition under a HP Agreement?

Which 1983 COURT OF APPEAL DECISION states that there's no duty on the buyer to enquire as to the sellers right to dispose the goods?

Which are the relevant sections under SOGA and FA for buyer in possession?

For s.9/s.25 - which CHANCERY DIVISION case is the only case in which the rogue's title was avoided but he was still able to pass title due to "bought or agreed to buy"?

Which CHANCERY DIVISION authority dictates whether ROT's can be included under "has bought or agreed to buy" for the purposes of s.9?

Name the features of a conditional sale agreement which will mean that it wont come under "bought or agreed to buy" for the purposes of s.9

Which HOUSE OF LORDS case was merged with a COURT OF APPEAL case under s.8 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974?

Name the COURT OF APPEAL case which contains a type of conditional sale agreement which would still be ok under s.9 'bought or agreed to buy'?

S.21(1) excludes agreements to sell

B's claim against Rogue S where ND applies?

O's claim against B2 where ND applies?

Damages in conversion are equal to?

What if B2 has improved goods and ND applies?

What are the elements of Estoppel and which case are they laid out in?

Who sets out the "broad" principle of estoppel and in which case?

Name a case in which there was sufficient words/conduct to amount to an effective estoppel

Name the case which holds that a log book is NOT a doc of title and is not enough therefore to create an estoppel

In which case was it held that mere possession is not enough to create an estoppel?

In which case did estoppel by negligence fail because there's no duty to register HP interests

Where is the defintion of an MA?

An MA may have two professions

First-time MA's are fine; MA's must be independant, not a mere employee or servant

Must be entrusted as an MA, not simply as friend

Which cases consistute authority on the requirement that MA's must be 'in possession with the consent of the owner'?

Sale must be simultaneous with disposition for MA?

Possession must be QUA MA

Which judge in which case described 'sale in the ordinary course of business' for MA's?

In which MA case did O manage to keep good title because their actions in relation to the goods negated the presumed consent under s.2(4) FA 1889? There was also no C of B.

In which case did an irregular location constitute the 'ordinary course of business' for an MA?

Which is the classic case for 'buyer in good faith without notice'?

Name the two common features of a VOID contract

Name the two common features of a VOIDABLE contract

Name the first House of Lords decision on a VOID contract

Name the two decisions which appear to contradict eachother in terms of void/voidable - one KB and one CA

Name the KINGS BENCH auction case in which the contract as voidable (and property passed owing to...)

Name the classic COURT OF APPEAL case on voidable contracts

Name the landmark HOUSE OF LORDS case on void contracts; what were the different views of the lords and who proposed overall reform?

In Shogun Finance 2003 HL, which judge cited which foreign codes as evidence to support his assertion that reforms to voidable title should be based on HE WHO BARES RISK

Which is the classic COURT OF APPEAL case setting out what you need to do to avoid title?

Which sections of SOGA and FA relate to Seller in Possession?

Which now overulled KINGS BENCH authority used to reign over "continues in possession or is in possession" for S in P?

Which AUSTRALIAN PRIVY COUNCIL case overulled Staffs Motor Guarantee with regard to a seller "continuing or is in possession"?

Which NEW ZEALAND PRIVY COUNCIL decision confirmed the physcial possession requirement laid out in the Australian case of Pacific Motors 1965?

Which COURT OF APPEAL case concerning dispositions was the first English case to confirm the 'continuous phys poss' requirement on sellers in possession?

Which 1937 case asserted that goods at the sellers disposal (i.e. in a warehouse) are IN his possession for purposes of s.8/s.24?

Which now overulled CHANCERY DIVISION decision held that 'actual' delivery was required under the "delivery or transfer of goods element" in s.8/s.24?

Which HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA decision overulled the requirement of 'actual' delivery under "delivery or transfer" for purposes of s.24/s.8?

Which COURT OF APPEAL decision confirms the constructive delivery requirement for the purposes of s.24/s.8 set out in Gamers Austrlia?

Which COURT OF APPEAL decision sets the scope of 'any sale pledge or disposition' under s.24/s.8 as being wide?