Kopieren und bearbeiten

Explanatory Talk

Beschreibung

social saved (Finished ) Quiz am Explanatory Talk, erstellt von murat sertay am 15/08/2016.
murat sertay
Quiz von murat sertay, aktualisiert more than 1 year ago Mehr Weniger
Erstellt von Ein gelöschter Nutzer vor mehr als 8 Jahre
murat sertay
Kopiert von murat sertay vor mehr als 8 Jahre
1
0
0

Zusammenfassung der Ressource

Frage 1

Frage
Attribution research aims to find out:
Antworten
  • What causes specific behaviours
  • What causes specific ideologies
  • What causes society to develop a collective identity

Frage 2

Frage
According to the attribution theory, when real world events occur what are we, as individuals, likely to do first?
Image:
a71230f0-500b-45c7-97ed-f608e3a73077 (image/jpeg)
Antworten
  • Find out what caused it
  • Find out how it happened to begin with
  • Find out if society was to blame

Frage 3

Frage
Does research suggest that we are always rational in our decisions?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 4

Frage
The general aggression model (Anderson & Bushman, 2002), suggests that our ________ affects how we decide to act in potentially aggressive situations.
Image:
11f068fc-3115-44c7-ad2c-a14a2530513a (image/jpeg)
Antworten
  • Arousal levels
  • Previous experiences
  • Mood

Frage 5

Frage
The rational choice theory states that we are always rational. Is this statement true or false?
Antworten
  • True
  • False

Frage 6

Frage
Which way does the situation have to balance for us to act prosocially in situations that require it, according to Darley and Latané (1968)?
Antworten
  • Pros outweigh cons
  • Cons outweigh pros
  • Neither, they can be balanced
  • They did not investigate this

Frage 7

Frage
Kelley's (1967) covariation model relies on three components. They are:
Image:
66b57664-0b86-4e12-a56c-5053d63826b9 (image/jpeg)
Antworten
  • Consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency
  • Consensus, disparity, and consistency
  • Covariation, distinctiveness, and consensus
  • None of the above

Frage 8

Frage
Kelley furthered his work on the covariation model with the configuration model (1972), citing that there need to be multiple [blank_start]sufficient[blank_end] and [blank_start]necessary[blank_end] causes when we attribute causality to behaviour in a situation.
Image:
3f9be96d-cd34-4fb2-8709-280e50e7124c (image/png)
Antworten
  • sufficient
  • necessary

Frage 9

Frage
Internal attribution refers to when causality is:
Antworten
  • Within the person themselves
  • Within the event itself
  • Within society itself

Frage 10

Frage
External attribution refers to when causality is:
Antworten
  • Outside of the person themselves
  • Outside of the event itself
  • Outside of social circumstances

Frage 11

Frage
Where we attribute cause has ________ impact on how we respond to it. For example, if you had heard about a murder, how would you feel?
Antworten
  • A major
  • Very little

Frage 12

Frage
One major criticism of Kelley's (1967) covariation model is that it is:
Antworten
  • Overly scientific and analytical, not representative of casual thinking
  • Unable to casually explain the role of society
  • Outdated, and needs to be updated to reflect modern environmental factors

Frage 13

Frage
Actor-observer difference is when:
Image:
0edc4dc6-3188-43df-b640-cbf1097c0f3a (image/jpeg)
Antworten
  • Individuals overemphasize external factors and underemphasize internal factors
  • Individuals overemphasize internal factors and underemphasize external factors

Frage 14

Frage
Fundamental attribution error refers to:
Image:
82e637a2-a541-4b76-abd1-0703d8c359b3 (image/jpeg)
Antworten
  • An uncharacteristic overemphasis on internal factors
  • An uncharacteristic overemphasis on external factors

Frage 15

Frage
Internal/external distinction refers to whether or not a situation was in an individual's control. However, there are some questioning whether or not it is really relevant. They argue that:
Image:
137c7eaa-883d-417f-8df4-408b44e3d3e3 (image/jpeg)
Antworten
  • It's more about the responsibility of that person or situation, rather than the victim of it. The intention is more important
  • It's more about the self-victimisation aspect of the situation, than who is responsible for its causation
  • They did not argue any of it

Frage 16

Frage
An example of the validity of internal/external attribution is when someone turns up late. Would one care about where to locate the causation, or whether it was intentional of them to be late in the first place?
Image:
946dc407-f5fd-42e4-a0a1-aaf4bd125b9a (image/jpeg)
Antworten
  • Their intentions, and if they meant to be late
  • Where causation is localised

Frage 17

Frage
An issue with internal/external attribution is how they are:
Antworten
  • Highly unrealistic
  • Incredibly outdated

Frage 18

Frage
Is internal-external attribution representative of everyday thinking?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 19

Frage
Does internal-external attribution have significant ecological validity?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 20

Frage
Are the experiments that seek to support attribution research realistic or unusual?
Antworten
  • Very realistic
  • Highly unusual

Frage 21

Frage
Do findings from studies show experiment-specific effects (eg, Actor-Observer differences) where levels are changed if participants receive empathetic instructions (Regan & Totten, 1975)?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 22

Frage
Are the findings from attribution research culturally-specific or widely generalisable? For example, would attribution bias or self-serving bias be the same in India as it would be in the United Kingdom?
Antworten
  • Yes, the findings are widely generalisable
  • No, the findings are culturally-specific

Frage 23

Frage
Ichheiser (1943) argued that:
Antworten
  • Attributions are fresh and private mental cognitions that are unique to individuals in their minds
  • Attributions are actually ideological - in other words, ready-made and culturally-available - assumptions that circulate around society ("ideologies") that become presuppositions

Frage 24

Frage
Has there been criticism levelled at attribution research to suggest that it has been overemphasising the roles of underlying cognition and not delving into actionable causes?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 25

Frage
Potter (1966) argued that attribution research can move away from cognition and look into actionable circumstances (eg, agreeing, disputing, exonerating, and blaming). What is this called?
Antworten
  • Explanatory talk
  • Discursive talk
  • Attributional talk

Frage 26

Frage
With explanatory talk, we can:
Antworten
  • Understand how people communicate and use attributions in social interactions
  • Understand how people communicate and attribute causes to either themselves or others
  • Understand how people communicate and form ideological ideas that circulate around society

Frage 27

Frage
Action orientation refers to:
Antworten
  • What talk does
  • What talk says
  • What talk can do

Frage 28

Frage
By using action orientation, we can:
Antworten
  • Observe how people do things in talk (eg, exonerate, blame)
  • Observe how we form these things in talk
  • Observe how we can late stop ourselves from doing certain things

Frage 29

Frage
Is the discursive approach relevant to real-world situations?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 30

Frage
Do laboratory studies from discourse analysis extend to real-world situations as well?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 31

Frage
Verbs are:
Antworten
  • Doing certain types of work (eg, exonerate, blame, diffuse) in talk
  • Action words

Frage 32

Frage
Dickerson (2012) argues that we need context to avoid wrongful attributions. Can we question the utility (or usefulness) of decontextualised, 'stripped-down' stimulus sentences?
Antworten
  • Yes, because they lack the context inherent in real talk
  • No, because we have enough already to make presuppositions

Frage 33

Frage
Weiner (et al., 1987) analysed various types of account-giving literature. Which was the most successful?
Antworten
  • External, uncontrollable, and uninentional accounts
  • Internal, controllable, and intentional accounts

Frage 34

Frage
Can external, uncontrollable, and unintentional accounts (Weiner, et al., 1987) still fail?
Antworten
  • Yes, because not all are realistic (eg, "I'm being chased by aliens with ray guns")
  • No, because all of them can be believed by anyone

Frage 35

Frage
Discursive approaches focus on:
Antworten
  • Real-world, contextualised accounts of explanatory talk
  • Fictional, hypothetical accounts of explanatory talk

Frage 36

Frage
Cognitivist research understands attribution to be a language that unproblematically represents - or is a clear window to - an underlying cognitive reality (eg, hidden motives). What is this understood as?
Antworten
  • Discursive psychology
  • Cognitivist psychology
  • Attributional psychology
  • Conversational psychology

Frage 37

Frage
Discursive approaches to psychology are:
Antworten
  • Constructionist
  • Perceptual
  • Cognitive
  • Biological

Frage 38

Frage
With discursive psychology and conversational analysis, psychology can:
Antworten
  • Observe the versions of the world that people construct, and what these do or achieve
  • Observe the versions of ourselves that we construct, and how this affects our mental cognitions
  • Observe how society constructs our realities, and what they can achieve

Frage 39

Frage
Can descriptions help to execute blame or diffuse presuppositions? For example, a cross-examiner in a courtroom with a rape victim who is trying to attribute blame through his descriptive language (eg, "You were talking an awful lot to him").
Antworten
  • Yes because, although the language is descriptive, the implications are heavily accusatory
  • No, because there is little to suggest that anyone is being accusatory

Frage 40

Frage
In political talk, there are politicians that use a term that appeals to commonplace stances but remains vague in its meaning. What is it called?
Antworten
  • National interest
  • National commonplace
  • National stance

Frage 41

Frage
This type of psychology emphasises what the talk is doing and the importance of sequential context in conversations and why it is there. What is this called?
Antworten
  • Conversational analysis
  • Utterance analysis
  • Sequential analysis

Frage 42

Frage
________ ________ is less concerned with developing a critique of the cognitivist approach of social psychology, and psychology in general.
Antworten
  • Conversation analysis
  • Discursive analysis

Frage 43

Frage
________ ________ maes use of methods (eg, conversation alaysis) and other methods such as rhetorical analysis to further its own critical agenda.
Antworten
  • Conversation analysis
  • Discursive analysis

Frage 44

Frage
Antaki (1994) argued that there are places in interactions - either self-developed or done by others - where one has to justify or explain an interaction. What are these called?
Antworten
  • Explanation slots
  • Discursive slots
  • Conversational slots

Frage 45

Frage
Do slots according to Antaki (1994) need to be observable by everyone?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 46

Frage
Can these slots explained by Antaki (1994) be developed by the speaker themselves as well as those that they are conversing with?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 47

Frage
According to Antaki (1994), these slots are:
Antworten
  • Random, and can appear at any time
  • Sequentially relevant, and interactionally occasioned

Frage 48

Frage
________ ________ uses explanation slots that can be engineered by one speaker for another, or by one speaker for themselves. The talk is interactionally-occasioned and sequentially-relevant. Problematic (or "dispreferred") actions have a distinct conversational design compared to socially-preferred actions (eg, accepting an invitation). There are also normative features of account-giving, which have interactional and social advantages (eg, preventing a "spiral of accounting").
Antworten
  • Conversation analysis
  • Discourse psychology

Frage 49

Frage
________ ________ involves commonplace phrases that can be flexibly deployed in explanatory talk to achieve various interactional outcomes (eg, exoneration, blame). Descriptions are never neutral, and there is almost always evidence from real talk that they construct events or the world in certain ways to achieve goals or outcomes (eg, implying a negative tone with descriptive language).
Antworten
  • Discursive psychology
  • Conversation analysis

Frage 50

Frage
In this realm, there are risks that the slots Antaki (1994) talks about have a mechanistic view that is not entirely realistic. Additionally, explanations may not be fine-grained enough to describe real-world interactions, and need to be more descriptive. Are these from within the discursive paradigm or outside of it?
Antworten
  • Within the discursive paradigm
  • Outside of the discursive paradigm

Frage 51

Frage
In this realm, critics argue that if we focus on only interactional concerns in real-world talk, then we could be ignoring the ideological issues that exist as well (eg, governmental hierarchies, socioeconomic differences, victim-blaming cultures). Is this in or outside the discursive paradigm realm? Furthermore, they also argue that we could be abandoning the cognitive aspect entirely, and therefore, being overly-narrow when it is unnecessary.
Antworten
  • Inside of it
  • Outside of it

Frage 52

Frage
Exonerating explanations are:
Antworten
  • Explanations of accounts for why we, or others, might not approve of
  • Explanations of accounts for why we, or others may approve of

Frage 53

Frage
According to the correspondent interference theory (Jones & Davis, 1965), we attempt to:
Antworten
  • Correspond behaviour with the features of a person
  • Correspond preferences with the feature of a person

Frage 54

Frage
Hedonic relevance refers to:
Antworten
  • The positive or negative impact that a behaviour to be explained has on a person deciding where attribution must go
  • The positive or negative impact that a behaviour to be disputed or exonerated has on a person deciding on possible attribution

Frage 55

Frage
For Jones and Davis (1965), personalism refers to:
Antworten
  • Our likelihood in understanding a complaint directed at us as correspondent to a disposition in the person
  • Our likelihood in understanding a complaint directed at others to be relevant to society

Frage 56

Frage
________ ________ ________ refers to the ways in which many causes are anticipated to be needed to explain an unusual or difficult to achieve phenomenon.
Antworten
  • Multiple necessary causes
  • Multiple sufficient causes

Frage 57

Frage
________ ________ ________ refers to the ways in which any one number of possible causes are anticipated as being adequate or sufficient to explain a regular or easy to achieve phenomenon.
Antworten
  • Multiple necessary causes
  • Multiple sufficient causes

Frage 58

Frage
Jacobson, McDonald, Follette and Berley (1985) noted that where negative behaviour by one's partner was:
Antworten
  • Attributed to the partner and relationship distress compared to positives
  • Attributed to themselves and their own faults compared to the positives

Frage 59

Frage
Research (Fincham, Beach & Nelson, 1987; Fincham, Beach & Baucom, 1987; Fincham & O'Leary, 1983) has highlighted that distressed couples who are in marital therapy attributed hypothetical causes as:
Antworten
  • Negative and global
  • Positive and global

Frage 60

Frage
According to McArthur (1972), could people "underutilise" areas of Kelley's (1967) covariation model?
Antworten
  • Yes, they can
  • No, it's automatic

Frage 61

Frage
In the Jones and Harris (1967) study, it was found that participants:
Antworten
  • Attributed attitudes towards whichever speech was being written (eg, pro-Castro writers were pro-Castro)
  • Attributes attitudes away from whichever speech was being written (eg, pro-Castro writers were anti-Castro)

Frage 62

Frage
Fundamental attribution error is largely about:
Antworten
  • The over and underestimation of situational factors in attribution
  • The accuracy of attributions concerning situational factors

Frage 63

Frage
According to Rholes and Pryor (1982), is it more about the person rather than the situation?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 64

Frage
For Lerner (1980) are we more motivated to hold certain beliefs, particularly for blame, when bad things happen to people (eg, murder)?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 65

Frage
Has research (eg, Nisbett & Ross, 1980; Miller, 1984) found there to be cultural differences for attribution and beliefs regarding fundamental attribution error?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 66

Frage
Has research (Block & Funder, 1986; Funder, 1987; Hewstone, 1989) found there to be demand characteristics in fundamental attribution error studies?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 67

Frage
Has research (Choi, et al., 1999) found there to be a cultural variation of internal attributions?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 68

Frage
According to the Storms (1973) study, did participants tend to explain their own behaviour with more emphasis on situational factors?
Antworten
  • Yes, they did
  • No, they did not

Frage 69

Frage
According to the Storms (1973) study, did reorienting visuals change participants' attributions?
Antworten
  • Yes, it did
  • No, it did not

Frage 70

Frage
For Regan and Totten (1975), empathetic attribution refers to when we feel:
Antworten
  • Empathy for another person
  • Empathy for ourselves

Frage 71

Frage
Regan and Totten (1975) found that participants who received empathetic orientation were:
Antworten
  • More likely to provide situational attributions rather than dispositional
  • No attributions at all

Frage 72

Frage
Did the Malle (et al., 2007) meta-analysis yield high or low effect sizes?
Antworten
  • High effect sizes
  • Low effect sizes

Frage 73

Frage
For Malle (et al., 2007), it's about:
Antworten
  • Internal-external attribution
  • Reason-causal history

Frage 74

Frage
Self-serving bias refers to:
Antworten
  • When we tend to explain our success as internal, and failures as external
  • When we tend to explain our success as external, and our failures as internal

Frage 75

Frage
Are there cultural variations in self-serving bias?
Antworten
  • Yes, there are
  • No, there are not

Frage 76

Frage
Intergroup bias is the idea that:
Antworten
  • We attribute success of our own group (eg, football team to skill) differently to others (eg, rival time to poor officiating)
  • We attribute both success and failure towards societal values

Frage 77

Frage
Could, according to Hewstone (1989), intergroup biases be also down to stereotypes?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 78

Frage
Did Deaux (1976) find British stereotypes of men and women, at the time, to be extremely sexist?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 79

Frage
Social representations, broadly, refer to:
Antworten
  • Socially shared understandings that may change over time or differ for certain groups
  • Individually shared understandings that stay rigid and hierarchical for generations

Frage 80

Frage
Did Moscovici (1976) find students using the word "complex" to be large among school pupils and students?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 81

Frage
Attribution semantics refer to:
Antworten
  • How verbal descriptions can have causal implications (meanings)
  • How verbal descriptions can be used for societal gains

Frage 82

Frage
According to the Ferstl (et al., 2011) findings, did participants respond differently with male and female noun phrases?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 83

Frage
According to the Ferstl (et al., 2011) findings, were negative verbs attributed to males and positives to females?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 84

Frage
Noun phrase positioning and attribution tends to be on which side for English speakers (eg, "Alan called for Jane")?
Antworten
  • Left (NP1)
  • Right (NP2)

Frage 85

Frage
Has research suggested that different noun phrase positioning can elicit different causal implications?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 86

Frage
Stripped-down stimulus refers to experiments where participants:
Antworten
  • Are given context in their sentences
  • Are not given any context in their sentences

Frage 87

Frage
For Edwards and Potter (1992, 1993), do we attribute the cause of telephoning itself to the person who engages in the physical action of making a telephone call?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 88

Frage
Did Edwards and Potter (1992, 1993) argue that finding out situational responsibility alters attribution?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 89

Frage
Is blame typically an NP1 verb or an NP2 verb?
Antworten
  • NP1
  • NP2

Frage 90

Frage
Do we, according to Edwards and Potter (1992, 1993) want to know why we are being told stimulus sentences and what it is doing?
Antworten
  • Yes, we do
  • No, we do not

Frage 91

Frage
The conversation model (Garfinkel, 1967) refers to:
Antworten
  • How requests for explanations can shape the responses that they elicit
  • How requests for explanations are cognitively based

Frage 92

Frage
Do all of our conversational utterances, according to Grice (1975) need to be informative, clear, relevant, and true?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 93

Frage
Do requests or explanations, according to Pomerantz (1984) and Dickerson (2001) always happen?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 94

Frage
Is explaining behaviour noted by Antaki (1994) as "sanctionable behaviour"?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 95

Frage
Is there a difference between excuses and good-reason giving justifications for behaviour according to research (Scott & Lyman, 1968; Semin & Manstead, 1983)?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 96

Frage
Excuses deny agency, and justifications accept responsibility (Shaw, Wild & Colquitt, 2003). Is this statement true or false?
Antworten
  • True
  • False

Frage 97

Frage
Did Shaw (et al., 2003) find excuses to be more effective than justifications?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 98

Frage
For Weiner (et al., 1987), communicated accounts versus real reasons refers to:
Antworten
  • The distinction between reasons for why someone could not attend coffee with a suspicious stranger and the real reason why
  • The distinction between what society wants and what you want

Frage 99

Frage
Did LeCouteur and Oxland (2011) note that the ways in which the categories in talk work to minimise or account for violent behaviour that the interviewee was or had been engaged in?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No

Frage 100

Frage
Can discursive research be seen as not focusing more on other factors that could affect interactional work?
Antworten
  • Yes
  • No
Zusammenfassung anzeigen Zusammenfassung ausblenden

Möchten Sie mit GoConqr kostenlos Ihre eigenen Quiz erstellen? eigenen Mehr erfahren.

ähnlicher Inhalt

Physics P3 Fashcards
Holly Bamford
Malware quiz
14lwright
CONNECTORS IN ENGLISH
First years
ghj
Mahamed ali Muhudin
islam
Michael Smith
Apple Cares?
clara.robinson26
Presente perfect simple.
Tiago Horn
UNIT 4 MARK SCHEME - Constitution
Bethany Fieldhouse
UNIT 4 MARK SCHEMES - Supreme Court
Bethany Fieldhouse
1_Histories of Social Psychology
murat sertay
Language Development
murat sertay
Bibliothek durchsuchen