Unit 2 - US Politics - Political Parties

Beschreibung

- Government & Politics Karteikarten am Unit 2 - US Politics - Political Parties, erstellt von Emily Bevis am 12/04/2018.
Emily Bevis
Karteikarten von Emily Bevis, aktualisiert more than 1 year ago
Emily Bevis
Erstellt von Emily Bevis vor mehr als 6 Jahre
8
0

Zusammenfassung der Ressource

Frage Antworten
Organisation and role of political parties - organisation, fundraising, communication, policy formulation - National Committees importance - DNC and RNC - "one size fits all" = meaningless due to size/diversity of America? - Party role/ideology differ between states - State-level = issue/candidate activists
What is the role of party national committees? - DNC and RNC - Organize conference for party nomination - set out 'ground rules' for primaries/caucuses timetabling - Formalise Pres and VP nomination - Delegates - BUT little control over state level party organisation - timetabled previously ignored by states e.g. 2008 Florida+Michigan punished for ignoring DNC rules = delegates vote halfed
Parties relationship with states - Traditionally parties more evident at state/local levels - result of varied ideology across country - 'bottom-up' organisation - BUT modern parties have very powerful national image - TV/media/internet = broad campaign to target variation of voters - New finance laws = more money to candidates rather than locally raised - Party policies = more partisan creating a clearer division - 'top-down' organisation
Define ideology - the set of beliefs held by group or an individual - a party direction/mandate - the explanation of how society works or how society ought to work - Conservative = restrict Gov intervention, oppose changes to society - Liberal = higher concern for social policy/treatment of others, high responsibility of the Gov - Crossover between two US parties - Democrat/Republican = not exclusive label - Geography = ideology division - not all agree on ideology
Typical Democrat policies - Mandatory healthcare - Same sex marriage - Pro-choice - Affirmative action to help minorities - Gun restrictions - Federal Gov involvement - Typically MORE LIBERAL
Typical Republican policies - Tough on immigration - Cut taxes - Pro-life - Limited federal involvement - Pro-guns - Capitol punishment protectors - Typically MORE CONSERVATIVE
Does ideology define party alliance? - Liberal ideology more likely to support Democrat policies - Conservative ideology = Rep - 2012 election = 85% of electorate with liberal ideology = OBAMA - HOWEVER geographical crossover = a Southern Democrat have similar ideology to a Northern Republican
Define Liberalism - an ideology on centre left of spectrum in US politics - Term first used in 1930s after New Deal - more politically progressive, support change, gov intervention and greater social/economic equality - Associated with Democrats - 2008 Obama = most 'liberal' member of Senate - Typically attract support of minorities, intellectuals, females, Blue-collar workers
The New Democrats - Liberal on social issues - BUT more fiscally conservative - Move away from decisive policies of tax and Gov intervention - Bill Clinton 1992 - "the era of Big Government is over" - wanted to win more conservative blue-collar/southern voters - Success of Southern candidates Clinton and Al Gore (1996 - BUT didn't win) - Faction emerged after failure of Carter in 1976 = liberal Demo = too socialist? - LINK New Labour = gain centre ground
The Liberal Democrats - socially/fiscally liberal - tax, welfare, LGBTQ rights - 2008 Obama = "most liberal" Senator - 2004 Kerry = Northern Liberal - 2016 Sanders = Northern Liberal - BUT exit polls showed 53% liberal support for Clinton - Nancy Pelosi - Congressional progressive caucus
Blue Dog Democrats - fiscally and socially conservative - DINOs = Democrats in name only - Found in south/north-west - ideological crossover with Republicans - against Obamacare - Ben Nelson, Nebraska = far right Demo - struggle to agree with Liberal Democrats
Define Conservatism - ideology on the far right of US spectrum - accept social status quo, against changes to society, against gov. intervention - alliance with the Republican party - 1980 Reagan = Conservative Republican - won 2 terms, large win, popular - Extremes of conservatism = encourage divisions within Demo party - attract support of white, high income, business voters
The Moderate Republicans - the "Wall Street" wing - mostly from N. Eastern States - fiscally conservative = low tax, public spending and gov. intervention - Socially liberal - Represent business/corporate interests - RINOs = Demo ideology crossover - 2000 Bush = compassionate conservatism
Conservative Republican - the "Main Street" wing - mostly rural/small town supporters - Fiscally conservative = support traditionally family values - 2004 campaign slogan "Faith, Flag, Family" - 1988 Bush Senior = moderate, only 1 term 1976 Ford = lost election
Religious/New Right Republican - "Neo-conservatism" - White southerns + Northern blue-collar - Fiscal conservatism = pro-defence $$ - Socially conservative = pro-life, pro-guns - 1980 Reagan = "Gov is the problem, not the solution" - Religious right grown since the 1973 RvW - Considered to be core of party - Growth of the Tea Party - Palin as McCains 2008 running mate
Explain parties as "Internal Coalitions" - Within Demo/Rep = ideology factions - DINOs, New Demo, Liberal Demo - RINOs, Conservative Rep, Moderate Rep - Difficult for factions to agree within own party - Geographical differences - Views of Southern Rep = different to Northern Rep. - South form the far right Rep caucus and Tea Party - BUT growing partisanship ideology becomes more decisive - 2013 Tax Payer Act = rejected by Rep - 2017 Trump attempt at repealing Obamacare = rejected by Democrats - Tea Party forced Republican party to move further right wing - 2011 Congress = no ideological crossover
Party divisions in UK - divisions amongst parties over issues - BREXIT caused significant divisions - 2016 referendum initially called to stop the growing Eurosceptic Conservative faction - Blue/Red/Purple Labour
What are the 6 big party issues? 1) Form of Government = Federalists want more centralised form of Gov 2) Federal Gov (1970s) = Nixon and Reagan 3) Economy = 1920s Great Depression benefit Democrat policies 4) Civil Rights = clear split between R/D, emergence of 1960s Dixiecrats, 2008 election racial undertones 5) Slavery = 'Solid South' for Democrats 6) Democracy = move towards greater democracy with direct Senate election
Ideology crossover in 1993 Senate - Most conservative Democrat was more conservative than 6 Republicans - CONTRAST 2011 + = no crossover
Is America a 50/50 nation? YES = late 1990s+2000s even seat split, only few seats 'tipping the balance', a Red/Blue split, from 2000-2008 only 8 changing states, increasing polarisation, decisive issues NO = too simplistic, swing states not definitive ideology, some states = divided districts
The 'Solid South' - Democrats traditionally had complete control of the South - 1960 = all 11 Governors and 22 Senators Democrat - But Johnson Civil rights = move towards Republicans - 1994 = 9-13 Republican Senators - 2012 = all 11 Senators Republican
Theory of Party Decline - David Broder 1972 - "like two bottles with different labels, both empty" - political parties in decline in terms of membership, functions and importance - followed a period of criticism 1970s/1980s - a sense of dominance over the two main parties?
Evidence for party decline x5 1) Candidate selection = primaries/caucuses give power to electorate - no 'smoke filled rooms' 2) Voter Communication = TV, internet etc mean easily contact voters - no longer party organised rallies 3) Candidate/issue centered voting = use of TV/media becomes less party centered e.g. split-ticket voting 4) Electoral finance = candidates receive money from PACs, public, fed $ 5) Emergence of movements = Tea Party, Occupy movement = more popular than traditional parties?
Evidence for party decline in 2016 Presidential election - Unexpected popularity of Sanders = uncertainty in Clinton's nomination? - Trump's Rep takeover - Clinton largely modernized self and campaign with use of social media - Trump practically ran his campaign through twitter - Ted Cruz high profile Tea Party supporter = movement domination - Trump spoke of his campaign as a movement to avoid politicians -'drain the swamp' - Large theme of issue/candidate voting - 39% electorate = independent voters
Define split-ticket voting When candidate vote for candidates of different party affiliation on the same ticket. - Decreasing partisanship? - 1972 = 30% split their ticket - 1980 = 28% " - BUT only 8% in 2008 - Link with the growing number of independent candidates/voters
Theory of party renewal - parties far from being in decline -argument emerged 1970s/80s - Party involvement in funding - Congressional status - Decline theories just exaggerate any party weakness
Evidence for party renewal x5 1) Decline exaggerated =Watergate did not end the Republicans - Reagan and Bush imperial presidency 2) Nomination process = Demo 'super-delegates' make up 20% on DNC Pres nomination 3) Party modernisation = shift in appeal to center grounds, $ manipulation 4) Nationalisation of Campaign = developments of party 'manifesto' e.g. 2010 Rep 'Pledge to the US' 5) Congressional partisanship = decisive issues and party votes, gridlock.
Evidence for renewal in 2016 - Only 2 seats in congress = not from either Demo/Rep - Super-delegates support for Clinton - contrast 2008 where picked Obama - Obama failure to appointed Garland to SC due to Republican Congress - Partisanship = total Demo rejection of Trump Obamacare rejection attempt - lack of bipartisanship - 36% of Rep. voters see Demo as a threat to US
Evidence for US two party system - FPTP = "winner-takes-all" = difficult for 3rd party success - D/R typically win over 95% of total vote - 2012 = 99% votes for D/R - 2017 = all HOR members of D or R - Only 2 independent Senators in 2017 - Sanders caucus with Democrats and ran as Demo candidate 2016 - 2017 = 1 independent Governor = former Republican candidate (WALKER)
Why is there a two party system? - FPTP = winner takes all - Third party support = wide geographical spread across states - no reward for consistent support - Too low % vote to have big impact - 'spoiler effect' as Independents/third parties just damage closest ideological party e.g. 1968 Wallace + Demo - Main parties = 'Big Tent coalitions' - Wide ideological reach = no more room - Third parties typically few issues = difficult to appeal to all
Evidence against a US two party system - Actually a 50-party system as each state party organisation = different - Only national policy programme in Pres election lead up = state variation - Difference between Texan and Maine Republican party - Some states = one-party states due to their domination - local, state, federal - No-party system as focus on candidates - Third party importance in 1992, 1996, 2000
Impact of third parties - examples - until 2012 all third parties = less than 2% of popular vote - 1968, George Wallace = 13.5% vote = split Demo vote = Rep victory - 1992, Ross Perot = 19% = took Republican votes for a Demo victory - 2000, Ralph Nader = 2.7% but controversial election result - Florida = Nader 1000 votes - Gore need 537 to win - 2016, Gary Johnson = on ballot in all 50 states - Libertarian party and Green party = permanent third parties
Where are third parties more successful? - State level - 2014 Bill Walker = Gov of Alaska - Number of independent representatives in Alabama, NY, Rhode Island, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Utah ...... - Little success in Senate = Sanders 2006 Connecticut and Angus King 2012 Maine
What is holding back third parties? - Electoral system (FPTP) - Finance - Ballot Laws - Media coverage - Lack of suitable candidates - Extremism? - Co-optation
Limitation of finance on third parties - Matching funds - Federal Election Committee - Major parties qualify for this through raising $5000 in 20 states = easy - BUT third parties only if 5% of popular vote in previous election - e.g. Ross Perot 1996 - a 'handicap'
Co-optation - 3rd party/candidates policies being used by major parties - 1992 Perot key policy = smaller federal budget BUT both Clinton and Rep congressmen adopt policy - reduce third party vote %
Third party extremism? - Libertarians and Socialists - outside to the political mainstream - Many accused Sanders of socialism in 2016 due to left wing policies - easy targets - create fear around candidates?
What is the Tea Party? - not a party or a PG - a GRASS-ROOTS MOVEMENT - individuals without any clear leadership - parallel Boston Tea Party = "Taxed Enough Already" - emerged due to opposition to 2008 Bank bailout scheme + 2009 Reinvestment Act - No HQ or offices = grown from the homes of activists - Limited gov, low tax and spending, originalists, 2012 Contract with America to repeal healthcare - largely opposed Obama's gov/reforms
Impact of Tea Party on 2016 election - Ted Cruz, Ben Carson, Marco Rubio = Tea Party supported candidates - Ted Cruz = previous 21 hour filibuster against Obamacare 2013 - Trump a favoured candidate?
Impact of Tea Party on congress - pushed Republican party to right = fear lose of right wing voters - 2011, 2013, 2018 government shutdown over federal budget debate - Tea Party Representatives = remove Boehner as speaker despite Republican - 2010 mid-terms = TP candidates on ballots but most lost - Marco Rubio = Florida - Freedom Caucus = influential in defining Rep policy direction
Define Neo-Liberalism - shaped by free-market - Business/corporation involvement in private sector - no partisan definition - left/right - Influence of money
Define Neo-Conservatism - movement from left to right - Influence of Reagan administration - Hardline stance during 1980s against USSR - Belief in US foreign authority - encouraged US invasion of Iraq - alliance with DINOs and Republican party - Aggressive foreign policy approach
Zusammenfassung anzeigen Zusammenfassung ausblenden

ähnlicher Inhalt

Conservatism Core Values
Joe Brown
Parliament flashcards
Angelica Tsapparelli
Conservatism Flashcards
Angelica Tsapparelli
Strengths & Criticisms of the UK Constitution
pcantellow
The goal of ecologism can only be achieved through radical social change' discuss Jan 2011 Q7 45mark
agbakobaawi
Electoral systems
newittjames
Differences between the political parties in terms of economic policy?
Joe Brown
Multiculturalism has failed?
Joe Brown
Conservatism key concepts slideshow
Angelica Tsapparelli
GOVP2 The Core Executive
Lucy Burke
Democracy
newittjames