Cases for Theft (A-Level Law AQA)

Beschreibung

Not actual cases just what they show
Jessica Williams
Karteikarten von Jessica Williams, aktualisiert more than 1 year ago
Jessica Williams
Erstellt von Jessica Williams vor mehr als 5 Jahre
72
1

Zusammenfassung der Ressource

Frage Antworten
Section 1(1) Theft Act 1968 D dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with intention to permanently deprive
R v Morris Appropriation is compared against the reasonable man
DPP v Gomez/R v Hinks Is consent a defence?
Section 5(1) Theft Act 1968 Belonging to another: having possession/control/right/interest
Turner Distinguish between ownership and control
Webster Right or interest in property
AG Ref No 1 Property gained by mistake
Section 2(1) Theft Act 1968 3 circumstances in which D was NOT dishonest
1. R v Small 2. R v Holden 3. R v Thurborn 1. D believes he has a right to deprive 2. D believes he has consent to 'borrow' 3. D believes he cannot find owner through reasonable steps
Feely Could be dishonest even if willing to pay
Ivey V Genting Casinos Impact on Ghosh Test
Easom Disposal of property or owner's rights
Zusammenfassung anzeigen Zusammenfassung ausblenden

ähnlicher Inhalt

Contract Law
sherhui94
How Parliament Makes Laws
harryloftus505
A-Level Law: Theft
amyclare96
AQA AS LAW, Unit 1, Section A, Parliamentary Law Making 1/3
Nerdbot98
Law Commission 1965
ria rachel
The Criminal Courts
thornamelia
A2 Law: Cases - Defence of Insanity
Jessica 'JessieB
A2 Law: Special Study - Robbery
Jessica 'JessieB
Omissions
ameliathorn0325
AS Law Jury Case Quiz
Fionnghuala Malone
Criminal Law
jesusreyes88