Erstellt von allie hatch
vor mehr als 5 Jahre
|
||
Frage | Antworten |
what is the general rule for acceptance ? | words must not only be spoken, also must be communicated |
if words aren't heard, what happens? case? | they must be repeated Entores v miles far east corp |
how are instantaneous communications treated ? | they are treated as an 'in person' conversation, there's special rules for non-instantaneous |
when does communication take place according to the postal rule ? case? | when the letter is posted, not received - Adams v Lindsell (even if the letter is not received) |
what is the criticism of this? | when a letter gets lost, the offeror may believe that they do not wish to accept |
what did Bramwell LJ say about this? | he would prefer it to be binding when received |
what does Household Fire v Grant say about this rule ? | that it is arbitrary since does not apply to non-postal acceptances |
is there a way to avoid this rule? case? | yes, by using EXPRESS WORDS -Howell Securities v Hughes |
what about retraction of a postal acceptance? | there is low case authority on this -Countess of Dunmore v Alexander |
Möchten Sie mit GoConqr kostenlos Ihre eigenen Karteikarten erstellen? Mehr erfahren.