Erstellt von Elena Oliva
vor etwa 5 Jahre
|
||
Frage | Antworten |
How does one gather evidence? | I - Identify: question of interest G - Gather: form hypothesis T - Test Hypothesis: conduct research A - Analyze data: draw conclusions B - Build body of knowledge: formal statements building theory |
What are Scientific Theories? | 1. Organized info 2. Testable 3. Prediction supported by research 4. Conform to law of parsimony (simple is better) |
What are Non-Scientific Theories? | 1. Make no prediction 2. Are not Testable 3. Cannot be Falsifiable |
Types of Methods | 1. Descriptive Research behaviour in natural settings 2. Correlational Studies relationship between variables 3. Experimental 'cause + effect' |
Case Studies | In-depth analysis of individual, group or event Advantages: detailed, challenge validity of theories, source of new ideas for further research |
Naturalistic Observation | Observation of behaviour in a natural setting Advantages: provides rich description of behaviour Disadvantage: observer presence = impact on behaviour |
Survey Research | Questionnaires Advantages: findings portray population as a whole Disadvantage: does not permit clear conclusions & rely on self-reports |
Correlational Research | Researcher measures one variable (x), another variable (y) & determines relation * No manipulation * |
Correlation Coefficient | Ranges from -1.0 to +1.0; sign indicates direction & absolute value indicates strength Positive: variables = same direction Negative: variables = opposite direction |
Strength of Correlation | Value of coefficient = strength of relationship Ex. correlation of -.80 reflects as powerful as +.80 |
3 Characteristics of Cause & Effect Relationships | 1. Manipulate one variable 2. Measures whether this variable produces change in another 3. Control for other factors that might influence results |
Independent Variable | Manipulated by experimenter; something that can be "changed" Ex. noise level, or dose or drug |
Dependent Variable | Measured by experimenter; "dependent on" what can be changed Ex. learning, # of symptoms |
An industrial psychologist studies the # of cars produced on the assembly line during morning/evening shifts. What is the IV and DV? | IV: time of shift DV: # of cars |
Experimental Group | Receives treatment |
Control Group | Not exposed to treatment |
Between-Subject Design | Different participants in each condition; groups must be equal for various traits |
Within-Subject Design | Same participants in all conditions; individuals are equal |
Counterbalancing | Def~ order of conditions is varied; No condition has an overall advantage compared to others |
Interaction | When one IV impacts the DV differently depending on the conditions of another IV |
Research Validity | How well an experimental procedure actually tests what it is designed to; Threats: confounding variables, expectancy effects & placebo effect |
Confounding Variables | When there are 2 variables and cannot determine which impacted the DV |
Experimenter Expectancy Effects | Unintentional ways experimenters influence participants to respond to the hypothesis |
Double-blind procedure | Neither participant or research knows which experimental condition the person is in |
Placebo Effect | A change in behaviour that is due to one's expectation, not because of an experimental manipulation |
Quasi-Experimental Research | Attempt to produce a cause + effect explanation but fall short |
Möchten Sie mit GoConqr kostenlos Ihre eigenen Karteikarten erstellen? Mehr erfahren.