26643063
Beschreibung
Karteikarten von Josefine Marie, aktualisiert more than 1 year ago
|
Erstellt von Josefine Marie
vor fast 4 Jahre
|
|
| Frage | Antworten |
| Assumptions of Normative Decision Model | - Explains under what circumstances and to what extent leaders should involve followers in decision-making - Autocrative (L makes decision alone, L gets information +makes decision alone) - Consultative (L discusses problems with F individually., decision alone. L meets with F as group, decision alone) - Participative (L discusses problems with F individually, decision together. L meets with F as group, decision together) |
| Normative Decision Model | - leadership decision style that is most conducive to effectiveness depends on demands of situation - Leadership Decision Style -> (Situational Demands) -> Decision Quality/Decision Acceptance -> Unit Performance |
| Normative Decision Rules | Rules to limit leadership styles to those feasible sets that protect the quality of the solution and/or acceptance of the decision 1. decision quality is important and followers have relevant information: not AI, not AII 2. decision quality is important and followers dont share goal commitment: not GII 3. decision acceptance is important + followers are unlikely to accept autocratic decision:not AI, notAII 4. decision acceptance is important+ followers disagree about best decision: not AI, notAII, not CI 5. When followers are likely not to accept autocratic decision and share leader’s goals: GII |
| Normative Decision Tree | Situational demands and requirements for leader depend on the answers to questions like: 1. quality of decision important? 2. team commitment important to decision? 3. enough info to make dec. on own? 4. Is problem well structured? 5. would team support it if decision alone? 6. Team shares orga. goals? 7. Conflict amongst team over decision likely? |
| Evaluation of Normative Decision Making Model | Strengths: - well supported by evidence - explains how leadership decision styles affect unit performance - takes into account different contingency factors, acounts for causality - simplified model gives practical guidance on participation Weaknesses: - very complex and hard to implement in practice - deals with only small set of leader behaviors related to decision-making |
Möchten Sie mit GoConqr kostenlos Ihre eigenen Karteikarten erstellen? Mehr erfahren.