234 lecs 8 & 9

Beschreibung

234 Karteikarten am 234 lecs 8 & 9, erstellt von mark k am 14/06/2015.
mark k
Karteikarten von mark k, aktualisiert more than 1 year ago
mark k
Erstellt von mark k vor mehr als 9 Jahre
1
0

Zusammenfassung der Ressource

Frage Antworten
Social psych Study of feelings thoughts and behaviours of individuals in social situations
Festinger & Carlsmith, 1959 Ss asked to lie for free, $1 & $20 -Free didn't justify themselves -$1 completely justified themselves -$20 justified themselves only a little more than free
Steps in research process 1-Research question 2-Hypothesis 3-Operationalise: Measure, what, how, who 4-Design it 5-Collect data 6-Analyse data 7-Draw apt conclusions
Concluding Causality 1) Relationship 2) Is relationship spurious 3) Does 'cause' precede 'effect'
Illusion of transparency We think others can read our concealed emotions eg. when lying
Spotlight effect We overestimate the amount others pay attention to our appearance and behaviours
Gilovich (2000) spotlight effect study Asked to predict how many people noticed embarrassing or desirable shirts: 50% Results embarrassing: 25%, desirable 10%
How to improve self esteem Success!
William James on self esteem SE = successes/pretensions
Efficacy of self-affirmations Helps those with high SE Hurts those with low SE
Leary (1998) on Self Esteem Sociometer: SE is indicator of social inclusion, makes us notice & suffer if we lose connections. Motivates us to make friends
Dark side of self esteem (Heatherington & Vohs, 2000) People with high self esteem were rated as rude and agitated when told something negative about themselves in conversation
Life satisfaction (Schwarz & Clore, 1983) When raining, people rated life-satisfaction and happiness lower, unless they were alerted to the weather
Dutton & Aron, 1974 Suspension bridge Misattribution of arousal: 50% called girl on scary bridge for 'feedback', 12% called her on safe bridge
Are we good at predicting our behaviour? (egs) NO Electric shocks (Milgram) Bystander effect (Darley & Latane) Conformity (Asch)
Kruger & Dunning (1999) Judging own ability study Students' perceived ability in rating jokes was way off the mark compared to actual ability
Affective forecasting problems: Impact bias: Tendency to overestimate the impact of future emotional events
Affective forecasting (Wilson et al, 2005) Lecturers predicted tenure is critical to their future happiness, Happiness was the same for those who got tenure and those who didn't
Why is affective forecasting poor? (3 things) -Impact bias, -Underestimate ability of "psychological immune system": discounting, forgiving, making attributions etc, -Focus on event itself and ignore the millions of real life things which affect us
Self-serving biases (definition) Attributional distortions that protect or enhance self-esteem
Self serving biases (2 egs) False consensus False uniqueness
False consensus Tendency to see one's opinions and undesirable behaviours as typical when they're not (self serving bias)
False uniqueness Tendency to overestimate the uniqueness of our desirable behaviours/attributes (eg. musical ability) (Self serving bias)
Why self serving biases? (3 egs) -Attentional bias -Availability of instances (eg. smokers noticing more smokers) -Subtle motivational influences eg. confirmation bias
Snap judgements accuracy -correlate well with judgements after 20 mins with skilled interviewers -Don't seem particularly "truly" accurate
Implicit personality theories (and how they work) -Informal theories about what different types of people are like -Based on self knowledge and life experience -Beliefs of how traits & behaviours are related -We "Fill in the blanks"
Faces (Zebrowitz et al 2005) Babyish faces judged more trustworthy, inappropriate for mature jobs
Central traits (Asch, 1946) Certain traits have disproportionate influence on final impression: Descriptions including the word WARM were rated *much* higher than those with COLD, other words kept the same
Biases in impressions (Asch, 1946) Primacy vs Recency -Same trait lists were rated better when good words come first
Which is stronger, Negative or Positive information? NEGATIVE (Baumeister et al, 2001) -Because negatives signal threat we may need to do something about
Physical appearance (Dion, Berscheid & Walster, 1972) Hot people rated as better at everything except being parents
Schemas Set of organised expectations about objects events and people, used to interpret new info
Robber's cave (Sherif, 1966) Boys randomly assigned to groups became hostile to each other, Only came back together when they had to cooperate to achieve superordiate goals
Rumour experiment (Allport & Postman, 1947) Image of black guy and white guy with knife described in a chinese-whispers game: By the end the knife passed to the black guy, as this better fitted people's schemas
Zusammenfassung anzeigen Zusammenfassung ausblenden

ähnlicher Inhalt

Propriété de la matière
levesquem2
PSY234 lec 7
mark k
234 lec 10
mark k
PSY234 lec 7
Bridonie Nicholson
Wirtschaft
Céline Rüegg
NEU: Das Mindmap-Tool auf ExamTime
barbara91
Städte Europas
Laura Overhoff
Vetie - Histologie und Embryologie
Fioras Hu
Vetie Radiologie Übungsfrage
Carolina Heide
Vetie Radio 2014
S J
GESKO A JOUR WS 2019/20
Caroline Hannah