Erstellt von mad-megz165
vor mehr als 11 Jahre
|
||
Frage | Antworten |
SOCIAL Piliavin (1969) Good Samaritan | Aim: investigate the effect of variables on helping behavior (Responsibility of victim; race of victim; effect of model; effect of group size). |
Method: field experiment. IV's- type of victim, race of victim, presence of model, no. of bystanders. | DV's- time taken for help to be given; no. of passengers who helped; gender/race/location of every helper; after the model, time taken for help. |
PP's: 4450 men and women who used the trains on a weekday between 11am and 3pm. 45% black, 55% white. | A team of 4 (2 men/ 2 women) acted out the emergency where the women were the recorders and the men were the victim and the model. |
The emergency: The male victim would wait about 70 secs before stumbling forward and then collapse on the floor where he would wait for help. | Conditions: Victim was either 'cane' or 'drunk'. The model was either late (150 secs)/early (70 secs) and in the adjacent/critical area |
Observers noted race, sex and location of everyone in the critical area, along with the total no. of people in the carriage. Both observers note spontaneous comments made too. |
Image:
Piliavin (image/jpg)
|
Findings: The cane victim received help 95% of the time whereas the drunk victim was only 50%. Of the spontaneous helpers, 90% were male. | There was a tendency of same race help, especially in the drunk victim condition. There was no strong relationship between the group size and speed of help. |
Image:
Piliavan2 (image/jpg)
|
Image:
Piliavin3 (image/jpg)
|
Möchten Sie mit GoConqr kostenlos Ihre eigenen Karteikarten erstellen? Mehr erfahren.