Erstellt von Megan McPherson
vor etwa 8 Jahre
|
||
Frage | Antworten |
People tend to talk about relationships in terms of | Work, commitment, involvement, uniqueness, manipulation, consideration and respect, journey or discovery, game, risky, uncontrollable forces, bargaining and trade offs |
Types of involvement themes | Communal themes "we", individual themes "I", impersonal themes: outside forces |
Assumption of consistency | We want others to be consistent, but we do not want our inconsistencies to be pointed out |
Assumption of Simple Meaning | We often mean multiple things at once, we can't rely only on what the words say |
Assumption of communicator independence | We talk about relationships as if the our behavior didn't contribute to the problem. Communication problems are the result of mutual contributions |
Assumption of Obvious Causation | Quick to jump to conclusions about why someone said something. Be careful when assuming things. |
Assumption of Finality | People may reach a compromise when there is a disagreement, but the issue could potentially come up any time later. |
Narrow | Broad |
Stylized | Unique |
Difficult | Efficient |
Rigid | Flexible |
Awkward | Smooth |
Public | Personal |
Hesitant | Spontaneous |
Overt judgement suspended | Overt judgment given |
Public | Personal |
Möchten Sie mit GoConqr kostenlos Ihre eigenen Karteikarten erstellen? Mehr erfahren.