Created by Jessica Williams
over 5 years ago
|
||
Question | Answer |
Section 1(1) Theft Act 1968 | D dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with intention to permanently deprive |
R v Morris | Appropriation is compared against the reasonable man |
DPP v Gomez/R v Hinks | Is consent a defence? |
Section 5(1) Theft Act 1968 | Belonging to another: having possession/control/right/interest |
Turner | Distinguish between ownership and control |
Webster | Right or interest in property |
AG Ref No 1 | Property gained by mistake |
Section 2(1) Theft Act 1968 | 3 circumstances in which D was NOT dishonest |
1. R v Small 2. R v Holden 3. R v Thurborn | 1. D believes he has a right to deprive 2. D believes he has consent to 'borrow' 3. D believes he cannot find owner through reasonable steps |
Feely | Could be dishonest even if willing to pay |
Ivey V Genting Casinos | Impact on Ghosh Test |
Easom | Disposal of property or owner's rights |
Want to create your own Flashcards for free with GoConqr? Learn more.