Created by Lucy Cerys
over 7 years ago
|
||
Question | Answer |
Philosophy | Study of fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence. |
Metaphysics | Explores fundamental nature of reality. |
Ethics/Morals/Politics | Deals with moral responsibility amd human thought/activity. |
Epistemology | Theory of knowledge; possibility of something and justified belief vs opinion. |
Logic | Study of argument structure and principles of reasoning. |
Theory of Ultimate Reality | Absolute nature of all things. |
Proposition | Meaning of a sentence which expresses a belief. |
Description | Gives information about topic. |
Explanation | Truth of statement already accepted but tries to say how it came about. |
Narrative | A story. |
Argument | Consists of premise, inference and conclusion. |
Premise | Reason/s supporting claim. |
Inference | Move in reasoning from premise/s to conclusion. |
Conclusion | Claim trying to be proved. |
Argument Map | Visual representation of logical structure of argument. |
Co-premise | Premises which rely on each other to sufficiently support the conclusion. |
Deductive | If premises are accepted then conclusion must be true. |
Inductive | Premises do not necessarily infer conclusion. |
Modus Ponens | If P, then Q. P. Therefore Q. |
Modus Tollens | If P, then Q. Not Q. Therefore, not P. |
Affirming the Consequent | If P then Q. Q. Therefore P. |
Denying the Antecedent | If P then Q. Not P. Therefore, not Q. |
Conditional | If P then Q: statement that does not assert P or Q but establishes connection. |
Antecedent | Statement that follows 'if' in conditional: P (or something that comes first). |
Consequent | Statement that follows 'then' in conditional: Q (or something that comes after). |
Valid | Deductive argument (if premises true, impossible for conclusions to be false). |
Sound | Valid argument with true premises. |
Cogent | Argument with rationally acceptable premises that support conclusion. |
Strong Inference | Premises provide extremely strong likelihood that conclusion is true. |
a Priori | Claims knowable before and independent of sense-experience. |
a Posteriori | Claims are only knowable after or on basis of sense-experience. |
Rationalism | Argues it is possible for us to know facts about the world outside our own mind; a priori. |
Empiricism | Argues all knowledge of world outside the mind is based on sense-experience; a posteriori. |
Analytic | Proposition is true or false simply by virtue of meaning of words. |
Synthetic | True or false not simply through meaning of words but through fact. |
Want to create your own Flashcards for free with GoConqr? Learn more.