Created by Yasmine King
over 7 years ago
|
||
Question | Answer |
Greenburg (case facts) | D left a petrol station without paying for petrol. It did not amount to theft or deception. So D had not committed an offence |
Brooks and Brooks (case facts) | D1 and D2 had a meal in a restaurant. D 1 then left in a hurry without paying for the meal. D2 tried to leave but was caught by the manager |
Brooks and Brooks (legal principle) | A departure from the spot where payment is required |
McDavitt (case facts) | D had a meal with some friends but refused to pay the bill. D waited in the toilets until the police arrived |
McDavitt ( legal principle) | The spot varies from case to case |
Moberley v Alsop (case facts) | D was stopped after going through a ticket barrier at the end of his journey without having purchased a valid ticket. There are two points at which D could/ should have paid |
Moberley v Alsop (legal principle) | There can be more than one point at which payment can be made |
Throughton v MPC (case facts) | D took a taxi home. As he was drunk he did't tell driver his address. The driver stopped to obtain directions and D accused the driver of making an unnecessary diversion. He demanded the full fare from V when he dropped him off at the train station. He hadn't finished the journey so payment was not expected |
Vincent (case facts) | D left two hotels without paying his £1,300 bills. D claimed that he was waiting for money for TV and newspaper work and that the hotel owners had agreed that he would not have to pay on departure |
R v Ghosh (legal principle) | D's conduct would be considered dishonest by ordinary standards or reasonable and honest people and D was aware that reasonable and honest people would consider his behaviour to be dishonest |
Allen (case facts) | D left a hotel without paying his bill. D claimed he genuinely hoped to pay his bill |
Allen (legal principle) | D must intend to never pay for the goods/ services |
Want to create your own Flashcards for free with GoConqr? Learn more.