Created by Pauli Ketchum
over 7 years ago
|
||
Question | Answer |
Contrastive analysis hypothesis (CAH) | similarities / differences between FL and SL strongly influence learning (part of behaviourism) |
Behaviourism | - formation of habits - linguistic input --> positive and negative reinforcement for correct imitation (CAH) |
Problems of CAH | - simple childlike structures used by adults from different countries - errors are not always bidirectional (object in Frensh and English) - some patterns aren't transferred (idioms, metaphorical expressions) |
Cognitive Theory | building up of knowledge systems - pay attention to certain aspect - practice and experience - aspect becomes subconsious and automatic --> new aspect (IGARL, restructuring) |
Restructuring (Cognitive Theory) | sometimes new knowledge is based on interaction of previous knowledge --> bursts of progress (or apparent back-sliding) |
Andreas Digeser | inventor of IGARL (impulse-governed active rule learning) |
IGARL | "Impulse-Governed Active Rule Learning": Linguistic input starts learning process - work out rules and verify them --> identifying and limiting regularities |
Communicative efficiency | communicative competence is unrealistic goal for non-native speakers --> rather efficiency (be able to express feelings and intentions) |
Creative construction theory | Chomsky (FLA: innatist position) internal, mental structures are constructed in predictable stages no need of active use Production seen as outcome not as cause of Language Acquisition |
Inventor of "Monitor Model or Input theory" | Stephen Krashen |
Monitor Model | a. the acquisition-learning hypothesis b. the monitor h. c. the natural order h. d. the input h. e. the affective filter h. |
the monitor hypothesis | - necessary for functionating monitor: sufficient time, focus on form, knowing the rules - rather on writing than speaking - not too much! focus on communication, not rule learning |
The acquisition-learning hypothesis | acquire: be fluent, intuative, interacting learn: attention to form and error correction Krashen: learning can't turn into acquisition |
the natural order hypothesis | Rules are acquired in a predictable sequence (not necessarily easy, independent of order in which they're presented by teacher) |
the input hypothesis | receiving comprehensible input just beyond current competence (i+1) |
the affective filter hypothesis | imaginary barrier through - stress, self-consciousness, demotivation, boredom, anger etc. --> learners under same condition make different progress |
H. Wode and S. Felix | they agree with Chomsky and Krashen about: innate compacity, different stages, sequences, learners make own rules, |
Want to create your own Flashcards for free with GoConqr? Learn more.