null
US
Sign In
Sign Up for Free
Sign Up
We have detected that Javascript is not enabled in your browser. The dynamic nature of our site means that Javascript must be enabled to function properly. Please read our
terms and conditions
for more information.
Next up
Copy and Edit
You need to log in to complete this action!
Register for Free
1192853
Defenses/Immunities (3)
Description
Law School (1L) Torts Mind Map on Defenses/Immunities (3), created by Mark Jones on 26/08/2014.
No tags specified
torts
negligence
defenses
torts
law school (1l)
Mind Map by
Mark Jones
, updated more than 1 year ago
More
Less
Created by
Mark Jones
over 10 years ago
26
0
0
Resource summary
Defenses/Immunities (3)
Comparative Fault
51% Rule
Annotations:
If the π fault is 51% and ∆ fault is 49%, the π recovery of damages is bared.
49% Rule
Annotations:
Equal fault 50/50 π loses and can not recover damages.
Pure Fault
Annotations:
If π fault is 95% at fault the π can recover 1%
Knowledge of the Risk
Assuming the Risk
Probability of Risk to π
Gravity of Harm
Number of People at Risk
Goal of π Conduct
Capacity of π
Emergency
Proximity of Harm
Contributory Negligence
Assumption of Risk
Annotations:
The π fully understands the risk of harm.
Express
Implied
Primary
Show full summary
Hide full summary
Want to create your own
Mind Maps
for
free
with GoConqr?
Learn more
.
Similar
Suit against firm in charge of fire hoses dismissed
jasmine-goh
Negligence Flow Chart
Kristin Tormey
TORT DUTY
Mark Jones
Medical Negligence
Jay Ganesh
Breach (8)
Mark Jones
Damages (5)
Mark Jones
Manufacture's Neg & liability
Jay Ganesh
Essentials
Jay Ganesh
Negligence
Jay Ganesh
Negligence Mind Map
Kristin Tormey
GCSE law Consumer Contract B144 WHOLE UNIT
Angela Dickinson
Browse Library