when someone either witnesses or
is the victim of a crime, they are
liable to feel intense emotions
fear and anger being the main 2
Deffenbacher (2004) found that high stress
had a negative impact on accuracy
Christianson and Hubinette (1993)
found that witnesses to real bank
robberies who had been
threatened had better recall than
onlookers who were not involved
however, MacLeod (1986) compared
real life eyewitness reports of 379
physical assaults with crime where no
physical injury occurred
found that there was no overall difference in
accuracy between the 2 types of crime
Flashbulb memories
vivid, long-lasting memories
which occur at times of
heightened emotion
EG. JFK's assassination
and 9/11
however, Talarico and Rubin
(2003) found that consistency for
flashbulb memories and everyday
memories do not differ
however, PP's rated their
recall of 9/11 as being much
more vivid, and had a greater
confidence in its accuracy
Nolan and Markham (1998)
found that confident witnesses
were seen as more accurate than
unsure witnesses, even though
the actual accuracy may not differ
Weapon focus
research has suggested that
witnesses often focus on a weapon
at the expense of other details
Johnson and Scott (1978) had PP's
witness a man carrying a knife with
blood whilst waiting for an experiment,
and other PP's saw a man carrying a
pen covered in grease
49% of PP's with the 'pen'
could identify the man, 33%
with the 'knife' could identify
Reconstructive memory:
Leading questions
leading questions affect recall
because they provide 'post event'
info which is integrated with info
of the original perception
a criticism of Loftus+Palmer's
study is that judging speed is
complex, therefore PP's are
more prone to being led by
leading questions
Loftus+Zanni (1975) - asked one
group "Did you see A broken
headlight" and the other "Did you
see THE broken headlight"
7% reported they saw "A broken headlight",
17% said they saw "THE broken headlight"
demonstrates that leading questions can
actually cause PP's to remember
something that was not there
however, Loftus (1979) used
leading questions to try and alter
PP's recall of the colour of a purse
PP's persisted in describing the purse as red
much research is highly
artificial as it takes place
under lab conditions
issues with
generalisability
Yullie and Cuthshall
(1986) showed that the
effect of leading
questions is diminished
in real life situations
however, research into the effect of
leading questions has led to the
development of the cognitive interview
used by the police, structured in a
way that avoids leading questions to
maintain accuracy of EWT