null
US
Sign In
Sign Up for Free
Sign Up
We have detected that Javascript is not enabled in your browser. The dynamic nature of our site means that Javascript must be enabled to function properly. Please read our
terms and conditions
for more information.
Next up
Copy and Edit
You need to log in to complete this action!
Register for Free
144634
4) Damages
Description
Tort Law Mind Map on 4) Damages, created by Alex Cooper on 07/07/2013.
No tags specified
tort law
tort law
Mind Map by
Alex Cooper
, updated more than 1 year ago
More
Less
Created by
Alex Cooper
over 11 years ago
146
1
0
Resource summary
4) Damages
EGG SHELL PRINCIPLE
NY: P'S RECOVERY REDUCED BY AMOUNT RECEIVED FROM OTHER SOURCES
EQUITABLE REMEDIES & INJUNCTIONS
Remedies & Injunctions available
Preliminary injunctions
i) Show likelihood of success on the merits
ii) Show irreparable harm
Permanent injunction - issued at end of litigation
Negative / prohibitory injunction - i.e. X enjoined from doing something
Mandatory injunctions
TEST
1) P must show no "adequate remedy at law"
money damages will not provide adequate remedy i.e. where tortious conduct repetitive / on going (trespass)
Note: court can give injunction + money damages
2) P must show the he has a protectable right involved in this particular law suit
'free square'
3) Injunction must be enforceable
Issue with affirmative or mandatory injunction
4) Balance of hardships - benefit to P must outweigh hardship to D
Defenses against injunction (not liablity)
i) P has unclean hands
ii) Laches - prejudicial delay in bringing request for injunction
iii) 1st Amendment - there can be no prior restraint
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
Common law - majority abolished + in NY
Contributory negligence
Bars P's right to recovery
Exception: Last clear chance
Imputed contributory negligence
Assumption of risk
NY: Primary assumption of risk - applies only to participants or spectators of formal recreational activities
Duty to retrain from reckless conduct - lower duty
You "assume the risk"
Majority rule + NY: Doctrine of comparative negligence
i) D must show P failed to exercise proper care for his own safety (reasonable prudence)
ii) D must show P is expected to observe self-protecting statues (e.g. don't jade walk)
Remedies
Pure comparative negligence
Damages allocated by percentage of fault
P always recovers something
Modified or partial comparative negligence
If P's fault over 50% - absolute bar to recovery
P's fault under 50% - recovery reduced by %
Show full summary
Hide full summary
Want to create your own
Mind Maps
for
free
with GoConqr?
Learn more
.
Similar
Tort Law I
Kane Paul
Trespass to the person
pavlina.hunt
Psychiatric injury
pavlina.hunt
OLA 1984 trespassers
pavlina.hunt
Psychiatric Injury Key Cases
pavlina.hunt
Our Legal System
celandreth
Trespass to the person key cases
pavlina.hunt
Tort Law II
Kane Paul
Civil Law - Torts
Sarah Levey
Occupiers' Liability Key Cases by Name
pavlina.hunt
OLA 1957
pavlina.hunt
Browse Library