17029281
Description
Mind Map by María Rodríguez Baquero, updated more than 1 year ago
|
Created by María Rodríguez Baquero
almost 6 years ago
|
|
A COMPUTER
GRADING
STUDENTS' ESSAYS
- ACCORDING TO
SOME AUTHORS
- ADVANTAGES
- It can reliably identify
certain characteristics
of the texts
- It can help students
to rewrite their
essays for a better
grade
- It can help students
to rewrite their
essays for a better
grade
- It can assign a
grade to specific
aspects
- In some cases, it is
more reliable than
human grading
- In some cases, it is
more reliable than
human grading
- It can use a formula
to generate a general
essay grade
- It helps to reduce
costs in hiring
human raters
- It can generate
more free time
for teachers to
teach
- It helps to reduce
costs in hiring
human raters
- It can reliably identify
certain characteristics
of the texts
- DISADVANTAGES
- It is not so reliable
analyzing more
complex aspects
- It can't measure
aspects such as
eloquence or
understanding
- It can't reliably
measure the creative
structure and its
variables
- Vision
- Creativity
- Logical
progression
- Vision
- It can't measure
aspects such as
eloquence or
understanding
- It can't provide
feedback and coaching
in the way as a human
does
- It can't teach about the
importance of human
communication or
certain kinds of values
- It can't point out
diversity in readings
and interpretations
- It can't teach about the
importance of human
communication or
certain kinds of values
- Computers can only
think within their
programmed
parameters
- They can't recognize
the infinite
possibilities of a
well-written text
- They can't measure
essential aspects for
effective written
communication
- Convincing
argument
- Accuracy
- Ethical
stance
- Reasoning
- Clarity
- Organization
- Convincing
argument
- They can't recognize
the infinite
possibilities of a
well-written text
- It is not so reliable
analyzing more
complex aspects
- ADVANTAGES
- MY FEELINGS
- POSITIVES
- It can give me reliable
feedback on specific
aspects of the essay
- Vocabulary
- Grammar
rules
- Use of
connectors
- Vocabulary
- I can interact with it
to improve technical
aspects of my essay
- As a teacher, it can
facilitate my work
when I have many
things to grade
- I think it can be
useful to reduce and
control plagiarism
- It can give me reliable
feedback on specific
aspects of the essay
- NEGATIVES
- It doesn't have the
knowledge about human
experience that a
teacher has
- I can't consider it as
an autonomous being
but as a useful tool
- It can't give me deep
opinions about what
I express in my
essay
- I can't argue with it
about my thoughts
- I can't consider it as
an autonomous being
but as a useful tool
- It could leave out
important
communicative
aspects
- Philosophical
conception
- The
argumentative
basis
- The
argumentative
basis
- Social
context
- Personal
thoughts and
beliefs
- Personal
thoughts and
beliefs
- Affective
exchange
- Ethical and
moral rules
- The possibility
of touching the
reader
- Ethical and
moral rules
- Philosophical
conception
- Reliability
and Trust
- I don't trust the
judgment of a
machine on a personal
expressive exercise
- I would question the
grades obtained by not
knowing the parameters
with which software was
programmed
- I consider that the
results in aspects such
as creativity or critical
sense would never be
reliable
- I don't trust the
judgment of a
machine on a personal
expressive exercise
- It doesn't have the
knowledge about human
experience that a
teacher has
- POSITIVES
Want to create your own Mind Maps for free with GoConqr? Learn more.