Herrera, S. G., & Murry, K. G. (2016). Mastering
Esl/Efl methods: differentiated instruction for culturally and
linguistically diverse (Cld) students. Boston: Pearson.
Sheltered Method
Sheltered Instruction works to show that there
is potential for all students to receieve a high
quality education where they can work for
academic achievement in content areas by
expanding upon the students' background
knowledge, exposing the arrangement of the
curriculum, and alternative assessment
practices.
This is done through scaffolding,
cooperative learning, hands-on
activities, visuals, and guarded
vocabulary.
For example, while
teaching about recycling,
bringing in recycled
objects for students to
observe, sort, or classify.
CALLA Method
CALLA Method focuses on students
learning more effectively through
mentally engaging activities and by
being strategic, teaching students to
use learning strategies, helping
students use learning strategies to
increase their achievement on
language and content tasks. Through
learning these strategies, students
become better language learners.
This is done through five phases
1. Preparation Phase:
emphasizes
students prior
knowledge and
experiences
2. Presentation Phase:
teacher begins by
presenting information
using visual or hands-on
materials
Example of Presentation
Phase: When beginning
lessons on separating
recycling, providing visuals
to introduce new or
unfamiliar vocabulary.
3. Practice Phase:
students collaborate
with hands-on
activities
4. Evaluation Phase:
students reflect on
their own learning
5. Expansion Phase:
students incorporate new
knowledge with existing
knowledge
ICB Method
Integrated
Content-Based (ICB)
Method focuses on
ontent-based second
language instruction
using academic
thematic units. These
are actvities that put
together teaching
content and language
concepts structured
around the unit's theme.
This method uses the
communicative approach by
emphasizing communication,
using authentic literacy in
context, and the use of all
language domains: listening,
speaking, reading, writing.
For example, while
teaching a weather
unit, the students will
listen to the new
vocabulary, vocalize
their favorite weather,
read stories about
weather, and write
(draw) their favorite
type of weather.
Grammatical Approach
Grammatical approach is
teacher-centered and focuses
on memorizing language
rules and sentence patterns.
Made up of methods such as
the Grammar Translation
Method, Direct Method, and
Audiolingual Method, it
focus' more on knowing
about a language than how
to use the language for
communication.
This approach uses
only L2 in the
classroom, with no use
of L1. It involves
mostly drill and
practice or rote
memorization. An
example would be
using memorization
for sight word cards in
English only.
Communicative Approach
Communicative approach focuses
on language learning through
communication, constructivism,
and social interaction. While it's
early methods focused on the
Silent Way, the Natural Way,
and Suggestopedia, the more
contemporary methods of this
approach focus on The ICB
Method and The Sheltered
Instruction Method.
These more contemporary
methods emphasize L2
development, thematic units,
scaffolded instruction, visuals,
and guarded vocabulary. An
example of guarded
vocabulary would be while
introducing weather words
you would select words that
are to help student
understanding of the thematic
unit, speak clearly and slowly,
use terms in context, and use
the words as often as possible.
Cognitive Approach
Cognitive approach
examines and analyzes
the cognitive
psychological side of
learning, language
learning, and instruction
to promote language
learning. It focuses on
the CALLA Method,
which focuses on
students learning more
effectively through
mentally engaging
activities.
This approach
focuses on
developmentally
appropriate
language instruction,
prior knowledge, and
explicit instruction
for metacognitive,
cognitive, and
social/affective
learning strategies.
An example would
be a KWL (Know,
Want to Know, and
Learn) Chart.
Chamot, A. U. (2009). The Calla handbook:
implementing the cognitive academic language
learning approach. White Plains, NY: Pearson,
Longman.
Language Experience
Appropach
This approach
teaches that what
is said can be
written down, and
what is written
down can be read.
It focuses on
approach that a
students' prior
experiences can
be used as a link
to new ideas and
concepts.
This can be students talking
about their personal
experiences and the teacher
dictates for the student. Later,
it can be used for reading
purposes. An example of this
is through classroom Daily
News. Through this, a student
is able to draw a picture
representing what they want
to share with the class, the
teacher dictates the news,
then the student and the
teacher can read it together.
Balanced Reading Approach
This approach combines
phonics instruction with
reading authentic texts
that are both storis and
informational writings.
It is based on evidence
that each student does
not learn the same way,
therefore there is no
one specific way to
learn to read. This can
be important in
learning if a student has
learned to read in their
L1 and accommodating
for that.
Examples of this
approach include
teacher read alouds,
interactions with
authentic texts,
classroom activities
to use language for
communication,
journal writing, story
writing, student
choice in reading,
and discussions
about information.
This may be using a
center to be pretend
play for the grocery
store. It is a pretend
real-life scenario
where students can
practice their
communication, and
read the labels in
both their L1 and L2.
Inquiry Approach
This approach is obtaining
meaning from experience
through activities.
Through Inquiry Approach,
lessons are planned
activities that move
learners through an
inquiry cycle to help them
learn from experiences.
An example of this approach
would be taking students
through the process of
whether something sinks or
floats. You start by discussing
what the big question is: will it
sink or float? Then, develop a
plan to take action by setting
up an experiment with water.
Gather resources to use to test
on whether they will sink or
float, then draw the
conclusions and report the
findings on whether the
objects would sink or float.
Then reflect together on the
entier process.