null
US
Sign In
Sign Up for Free
Sign Up
We have detected that Javascript is not enabled in your browser. The dynamic nature of our site means that Javascript must be enabled to function properly. Please read our
terms and conditions
for more information.
Next up
Copy and Edit
You need to log in to complete this action!
Register for Free
2951862
Behavioural and Evolutionary Economics
Description
Revision Material
No tags specified
econ2060 behavioural econ
econ2060
bachelor
Mind Map by
stella.kalis
, updated more than 1 year ago
More
Less
Created by
stella.kalis
over 9 years ago
8
0
0
Resource summary
Behavioural and Evolutionary Economics
Lakatos
Progressive: increasing explanatory power
Modern Behavioural Econ
study: effects ofpsychological, social, cognitive and emotional factors on decisions
verificationist
observation & experimentation
Degenerating: explanatory power only maintained by ad hoc modifcations to allow unexpected findings to fit
Neoclassical
deductivity theory and method
verifcationist approach to hyp testing
normative bias - doesn't explain actual econ; but utopia
Automotive Sector
different decision making processes: corporate vs family customer
little knowledge of market (don't buy cars often)
Kelly: Core Identity
emotions exploited to prompt consumption
dismissal of options that don't match identity
Enjoyment by Anticipation
test drive + talk about how car fills core values
wealth is relative
Biases and Heuristics
Anchoring ($)
Loss Aversion
Sunk Cost Fallacy (time)
Information overload ("Confusopoly")
revert to default options
Social Pressure - Fishbein-Ajzen model of behavioural intentions
Economics of Happiness: Easterlin Paradox
Relative Wages
Fairness
Justice
Local Reference Point - Anchoring Heuristic
Psychological Desires
Status
autonomy
control & lower uncertainty
Org. Rank
Novelty (comfort vs pleasure) (Scitovsky)
the brain shuts down if it receives no stimulation; but if we receive too much novelty too fast, it can overwhelm the brain
Modern life makes it easy to meet our basic needs, resulting in a lack of stimulus
habituate very quickly to changes in happiness.
Challenge
personal identity constructs limit ability to embrace opportunity
Social Security
Shackle
Aspirations (Simon, Cyert and March)
how realistic ?
how readily to aspiration adjust in line with attainments?
significant of core constructs to the aspiration
aspirations and ability to adjust - strong correlation to happiness and Income
Perspective & Frame of Mind
ways of thinking determine perception of stimuli
glass half full vs glass half empty
Biases & Heuristics
social reference points
Representativeness
Anchoring
Relationship Decisions: Partners, Children, Termination
Choice of Partner
Rarely Calculated Decisions
Utility Maximising: gather all info, do not settle for 2nd best, looking for better mate while in relationship
vs
Satisficing (Simon): decide on preferences, select someone who meets criteria
Aspiration levels set by external reference points (friends, family, TV)
Watching romantic movies lowers relationship satisfaction
Simple Search Rules
unhappy, regretful
needle/haystack analogy
"Price" or value of a person
Consumer Surplus (Settler / Reacher)
Price will be equal
Attractiveness is subjective
Friedman: supermodel marries man who promises to wash all dishes
Children
Cognitive Dissonance
Heuristics & Biases
Hyperbolic discounting
overconfidence
Illusory Correlation (representativeness)
Anchoring
Shackle - life-changing entrepreneurial gamble (high uncertainty)
no probabilities, just obstacles
no obstacle to happy marriage -> seen as perfectly possible -> unsuccessful marriage is a surprise
External reference points (Simon)
Evolutionary Approach: Routines used in raising children (from own childhood)
Termination
Clash in core values
Biases & Heuristics
Confirmation Bias
Sunk Cost Fallacy
Hyperbolic Discounting
Anchoring
Endowment Effect
Loss Aversion
Status Quo
Stuck because of core values (Loyalty)
Behavioural Theory of the Firm vs Kahneman & Tversky vs Nelson & Winters Evolutionary Analysis
BTF (Simon, Cyert March)
pursuit of sub goals by all staff
Managers aversion to change
satisficing not optimising
multiple goals not one global strategy
attention to goals in sequential order
avoidance of uncertainty
'if it works dont mess with it'
routines
allow small firms to experiment, buy them if it works
negotiated environment via lobbying
suppliers: Contracts
Customers: Marketing
Evolutionary (Nelson & Winters)
Firm as collection of staff knowledge
managers coordinate pool of resources
struggle implementing big changes
Routine based behaviour gives competitive advantage
survival of the fittest
rolled out on larger scale: franchising, licensing, buying out
Kahneman & Tversky
Heuristics & Biases influence decision making and subvert managers attempts to optimise profit
Founded in expertise: positive outcomes
Loss Aversion (links to uncertainty avoidance in BTF and routines of N&W)
Multiple goals: cognitive limitations, millers rule
Show full summary
Hide full summary
Want to create your own
Mind Maps
for
free
with GoConqr?
Learn more
.
Similar
B6 - Brain and Mind OCR
franimal
FCE Practice Fill In The Blank
Christine Sang
GCSE Biology Quiz
Andrea Leyden
Attachment - Psychology - Flash Cards
Megan Price
Physical Description
Mónica Rodríguez
GCSE Maths: Overview Note
Andrea Leyden
Contract Law
sherhui94
New GCSE Maths required formulae
Sarah Egan
Theory of Knowledge Essay Preparation
Derek Cumberbatch
1.11 Core Textiles
T Andrews
ОБЖ2
хомяк убийца
Browse Library